nmh-workers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh's future versus mailutils-mh?

2003-10-22 12:30:04
Ralph Corderoy <ralph(_at_)inputplus(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk> wrote:

Hi Peter,

mailutils-mh is clearly not a mature project yet, since given that it
rides on top on GNU mailutils once it fully works it should provide
lots of functionality (POP, IMAP, etc).

This is not meant to be flamebait, so please don't see it as such.
I'm just wondering about the future of one the engines behind MH-E.

I was wondering exactly the same;  nmh versus a new, clean, code base.
IIRC the recent announcement of a mailutils release said their MH
implementation was happily being used by MH-E now.

Well, the CVS version of MH-E works with it (which will be 8.0), but
there are still a few gaps in mailutils-mh compared to nmh.  But it's a
fast moving target.  When I discovered it's existence, I noted that it
didn't have an `ali' command.  One was coded a few weeks later.

I should be using it more to contribute bug reports...

Peter



_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>