PEM Dev (date)
January 31, 1995
- Names, certificates, etc. (was Re: DNs, boomerangs, and other Revealed Truths ), Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (Beast), 16:26
- Re: X.509 v3 Standard Extensions PDAM, Peter Williams, 15:44
- Re: Is secure communications required?, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (Beast), 15:33
- Re: X.509 v3 Standard Extensions PDAM, Housley, Russ, 08:59
January 30, 1995
- re:Using X.500 lookup protocols for PEM, Mr Rhys Weatherley, 21:53
- re:Using X.500 lookup protocols for PEM, warwick (w.s.) ford, 20:31
- Re: X.509 v3 Standard Extensions PDAM, Peter Williams, 19:15
- Re: Is secure communications required for PEM, Theodore Ts'o, 15:06
- Is secure communications required?, TCJones, 11:15
- Re: Is secure communications required for PEM, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (Beast), 07:42
January 27, 1995
- Re: DNs, boomerangs, and other Revealed Truths, Mr Rhys Weatherley, 20:09
- Re: DNs, boomerangs, and other Revealed Truths, Jueneman, 10:00
- Re: Are we an effective standards committee?, Dave Crocker, 00:01
January 24, 1995
- Re: Re[2]: Are we an effective standards committee?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 16:10
- Re: Re[2]: X.509 v3 support, Amanda Walker, 14:55
- Re: Comments on pem-mime-07.txt, Amanda Walker, 14:04
- Re: Re[2]: Are we an effective standards committee?, Ned Freed, 12:30
- Re[2]: X.509 v3 support, Paul_Lambert-P15452, 12:29
- Comments on pem-mime-07.txt, Paul_Lambert-P15452, 11:56
- Re[2]: Are we an effective standards committee?, Paul_Lambert-P15452, 11:50
- Re: X.509 v3 Standard Extensions PDAM, Stephen Farrell, 03:35
January 22, 1995
- Re: Vote early (but, please, not often), Amanda Walker, 16:15
- Re: Vote early (but, please, not often), frank, 13:47
- Re: RIPEM details, Mr Rhys Weatherley, 00:42
January 19, 1995
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Peter Williams, 13:06
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Ned Freed, 11:23
- Re: DNs in X.509 - v1 vs. v3, Jueneman, 10:21
- Re: DNs in X.509 - v1 vs. v3, warwick (w.s.) ford, 09:55
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Jueneman, 08:13
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Jueneman, 08:10
January 18, 1995
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Peter Williams, 21:32
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Ned Freed, 18:25
- Re: which version of certificate (was: Key selectors), James M Galvin, 17:00
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Ned Freed, 16:22
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Peter Williams, 15:20
- Re: Mandating certificates, Ned Freed, 11:29
- DNs in X.509 - v1 vs. v3, Jueneman, 09:12
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Jueneman, 07:49
January 17, 1995
- Re: X.509 v3 support (CRLs and critical extensions), Mark Wahl, 22:29
- Re: Are we an effective standards committee?, Ned Freed, 20:57
- Re: Mandating certificates, Jueneman, 20:47
- Recommendation to proceed to Proposed Standard, Jueneman, 20:46
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Ned Freed, 20:21
- Re: X.509 v3 support (CRLs and critical extensions), warwick (w.s.) ford, 20:10
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Jueneman, 19:59
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Ned Freed, 19:46
- Re: which version of certificate (was: Key selectors), Amanda Walker, 19:27
- Re: which version of certificate (was: Key selectors), Amanda Walker, 19:27
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Ned Freed, 19:26
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Ned Freed, 18:21
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Jueneman, 18:20
- Re: which version of certificate (was: Key selectors), Jueneman, 18:08
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Peter Williams, 14:50
- Are we an effective standards committee?, Paul_Lambert-P15452, 14:04
- Re: which version of certificate (was: Key selectors), Ned Freed, 13:40
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Ned Freed, 13:18
- Re: which version of certificate (was: Key selectors), Amanda Walker, 12:33
- Re: Mandating certificates, Ned Freed, 12:32
- Re: X.509 v3 support (CRLs and critical extensions), Mark Wahl, 09:58
- Re: X.509 v3 support (CRLs and critical extensions), Jueneman, 08:45
- Re: X.509 v3 support (CRLs and critical extensions), Jueneman, 08:27
- Re: which version of certificate (was: Key selectors), Jueneman, 08:00
January 16, 1995
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Peter Williams, 21:31
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Ned Freed, 21:09
- Re: X.509 v3 support (CRLs and critical extensions), warwick (w.s.) ford, 20:38
- Re: Random e-mail names, Ned Freed, 19:44
- Re: RIPEM details, Ned Freed, 18:29
- Re: X.509 v3 support (CRLs and critical extensions), Mark Wahl, 15:52
- Re: which version of certificate (was: Key selectors), James M Galvin, 15:24
- Re: which version of certificate (was: Key selectors), Jueneman, 15:18
- Re: X.509 v3 support, warwick (w.s.) ford, 14:43
- Re: X.509 v3 support, warwick (w.s.) ford, 14:28
- Re: RIPEM details, Jueneman, 10:36
- Random e-mail names, Jueneman, 10:35
January 15, 1995
- Re: Mandating certificates, Amanda Walker, 17:59
- Re: Mandating certificates, Jueneman, 16:54
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Jueneman, 14:35
- Re: RIPEM details, Theodore Ts'o, 14:03
- Re: RIPEM details, vitor, 12:59
- Re: Mandating certificates, vitor, 12:47
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Ned Freed, 12:25
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Ned Freed, 12:23
- Re: E-mail DNs (Was: Re: Are we a standards committee?), Ned Freed, 11:55
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Mark Wahl, 11:53
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Jueneman, 11:43
- Re: Mandating certificates, Peter Williams, 10:50
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Ned Freed, 10:49
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Amanda Walker, 00:48
- Mandating certificates, Amanda Walker, 00:48
January 14, 1995
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Jueneman, 20:59
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Jueneman, 20:48
- E-mail DNs (Was: Re: Are we a standards committee?), Jueneman, 20:26
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Jueneman, 19:56
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Jeff Thompson, 19:33
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Ned Freed, 19:22
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Ned Freed, 19:05
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Jueneman, 17:26
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Jueneman, 16:00
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Jueneman, 15:56
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Ned Freed, 15:55
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Ned Freed, 15:45
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Jueneman, 15:11
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Jueneman, 14:52
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Ned Freed, 12:31
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Ned Freed, 12:31
- How we got to this point, Jueneman, 09:39
- Re: RIPEM details, Jueneman, 00:02
January 13, 1995
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Jueneman, 23:29
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Jueneman, 23:23
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Ned Freed, 22:09
- Re: RIPEM/PEM/PGP compatibility, Ned Freed, 22:09
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Jueneman, 21:46
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Ned Freed, 21:45
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Ned Freed, 21:13
- Re: RIPEM details, Theodore Ts'o, 20:58
- Re: RIPEM details, Theodore Ts'o, 20:52
- Re: RIPEM details, Jeffrey I. Schiller, 20:51
- Re: PGP-MIME integration, Dave Crocker, 19:39
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Ned Freed, 19:38
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Ned Freed, 18:54
- PGP-MIME integration, Ian Duncan, 18:19
- Re: RIPEM details, Peter Williams, 17:53
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Jueneman, 17:08
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Mark Wahl, 16:56
- Re: RIPEM details, Jueneman, 15:41
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Jueneman, 15:16
- Re: RIPEM details, Theodore Ts'o, 15:15
- Re: RIPEM details, Wolfgang Schneider, 14:47
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Wolfgang Schneider, 13:51
- Re: RIPEM details, Robert W. Shirey, 13:27
- Re: RIPEM details, Theodore Ts'o, 13:18
- Re: RIPEM details, Jueneman, 12:01
- Re: X.509 v3 support, Mark Wahl, 11:27
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, James M Galvin, 11:27
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Jueneman, 10:36
- Re: RIPEM details, Mr Rhys Weatherley, 10:10
- Re: RIPEM/PEM/PGP compatibility, Jueneman, 09:10
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, James M Galvin, 07:55
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Jeff Thompson, 07:38
- Re: RIPEM details, Jeff Thompson, 06:24
- Re: X.509 v3 support (was Re: Key selectors), Jeff Thompson, 06:17
January 12, 1995
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Amanda Walker, 23:35
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Dave Crocker, 21:54
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Amanda Walker, 20:50
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Dave Crocker, 20:09
- <subject>, news, 19:04
- Re: X.509 v3 support (was Re: Key selectors), Ned Freed, 17:13
- Re: Key selectors, Jueneman, 15:41
- X.509 v3 support (was Re: Key selectors), Jueneman, 15:39
- Re: RIPEM/PEM/PGP compatibility, Ned Freed, 13:11
- Re: Key selectors, Amanda Walker, 12:40
- Re: Are we a standards committee?, Amanda Walker, 11:29
- RIPEM/PEM/PGP compatibility, Jueneman, 11:21
- Re: Key selectors, warwick (w.s.) ford, 11:11
- Re: RIPEM details, Derek Atkins, 10:35
- Are we a standards committee?, Jueneman, 10:28
- Re: RIPEM details, Amanda Walker, 09:16
- Re: RIPEM details, Jeff Thompson, 09:14
January 11, 1995
- Re: RIPEM details, Jueneman, 21:18
- Re: Key selectors, Jueneman, 21:01
- Re: Key selectors, Ned Freed, 19:52
- Re: RIPEM details, Jueneman, 16:53
- Re: RIPEM details, Jeff Thompson, 15:52
- Re: Key selectors, Jueneman, 15:10
- Re: Key selectors, Mark Wahl, 14:35
- Re: Key selectors, Jueneman, 13:00
- Re: Key selectors, James M Galvin, 12:59
- Re: Key selectors, James M Galvin, 12:40
- Re: Request for more info on PEM, Jueneman, 09:19
- Request for more info on PEM, Aswin Kokilananda EC4DR 32889, 01:18
January 10, 1995
- Re: RIPEM details, Jeff Thompson, 20:54
- Re: RIPEM details, jefft, 20:53
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pem-sigenc-03.txt, Internet-Drafts, 13:27
- PRESS RELEASE - RSA Licenses Commercial Distribution Rights to RSAREF (long), Christopher Allen, 02:35
- Security Ratings, Cheri Dowell, 02:33
January 09, 1995
- Revised Security Multiparts, James M Galvin, 13:12
- Re: Horse trading, anyone?, Jueneman, 12:23
- Re: RIPEM details, Jueneman, 12:05
- Re: Semantics of signatures, multiple and otherwise, Ned Freed, 12:04
- Re: Semantics of signatures, multiple and otherwise, Jueneman, 10:58
January 06, 1995
- Re: Horse trading, anyone?, warwick (w.s.) ford, 22:49
- Re: Horse trading, anyone?, warwick (w.s.) ford, 22:49
- 2nd Announcement: ISOC '95 Symp. Net. & Distr. Sys. Security, David M. Balenson, 09:46
- Re: keyid, and privacy, and interworking, John Linn, 08:15
January 05, 1995
- Re: altercation compromise, Dave Crocker, 21:35
- RIPEM details, Jueneman, 21:16
- Re: Key selectors, Jeff Thompson, 19:49
- Re: Moving the multipart stuff forward, Ned Freed, 18:45
- Re: Semantics of signatures, multiple and otherwise, Ned Freed, 18:10
- Re: Key selectors, Jueneman, 17:25
- Re: Semantics of signatures, multiple and otherwise, Ned Freed, 17:25
- Re: Semantics of signatures, multiple and otherwise, Jueneman, 17:24
- Re: Key selectors, Jueneman, 17:23
- Re: Key selectors, Jueneman, 16:28
- Re: Moving the multipart stuff forward, Mr Rhys Weatherley, 15:06
- Re: Moving the multipart stuff forward, Mr Rhys Weatherley, 14:42
- Re: altercation compromise, James M Galvin, 13:45
- Re: Moving the multipart stuff forward, James M Galvin, 13:44
- Re: Key selectors, James M Galvin, 13:25
- Re: Moving the multipart stuff forward, Dave Crocker, 13:24
- Re: Moving the multipart stuff forward, Ned Freed, 12:55
- Re: Key selectors, James M Galvin, 12:50
- Re: keyid, and privacy, and interworking, Peter Williams, 12:39
- Re: Key selectors, Ashar Aziz, 12:33
- altercation compromise, Peter Williams, 10:39
- Re: Moving the multipart stuff forward, Jueneman, 10:31
- Re: keyid, and privacy, and interworking, James M Galvin, 10:30
- Re: PK identifier issue, James M Galvin, 10:29
- Re: keyid, and privacy, and interworking, James M Galvin, 10:27
- Re: Key selectors, Jueneman, 10:07
- Re: Moving the multipart stuff forward, Steve Crocker, 08:45
- Re: Key selectors, Jeff Thompson, 08:43
- Re: Key selectors, Jeff Thompson, 08:22
- Re: Moving the multipart stuff forward, Jueneman, 08:12
- Re: Moving the multipart stuff forward, Stefan Monnier, 07:05
January 04, 1995
- Re: Horse trading, anyone?, Mark Wahl, 20:46
- Re: Moving the multipart stuff forward, Ned Freed, 19:21
- Approaching concensus? (Was: Re: Semantics of signatures, multiple and otherwise), Jueneman, 18:45
- Re: Key selectors, Jueneman, 18:35
- Re: Semantics of signatures, multiple and otherwise, Ned Freed, 17:52
- Re: Key selectors, Theodore Ts'o, 17:50
- Re: Moving the multipart stuff forward, Steve Crocker, 17:22
- Re: Moving the multipart stuff forward, Mr Rhys Weatherley, 17:21
- Re: Key selectors, Peter Williams, 16:57
- Re: Key selectors, warwick (w.s.) ford, 16:36
- Moving the multipart stuff forward, Mr Rhys Weatherley, 16:35
- Re: Key selectors, Amanda Walker, 15:52
- Re: Key selectors, Jueneman, 15:25
- Re: Semantics of signatures, multiple and otherwise, Jueneman, 14:43
- Re: Horse trading, anyone?, Jueneman, 13:36
- Re: Semantics of signatures, multiple and otherwise, Jeff Thompson, 13:18
- Re: Semantics of signatures, multiple and otherwise, Ned Freed, 12:48
- Re[4]: unpublished public keys (was: voting), Paul_Lambert-P15452, 12:21
- Re: re:Key selectors (Was: Re: submit the documents to the IESG), warwick (w.s.) ford, 12:19
- re: Semantics of signatures, multiple and otherwise, Jueneman, 11:58
- Re: Key selectors, Jueneman, 11:23
- Re: Key selectors, Jueneman, 10:09
- Re: Semantics of signatures, multiple and otherwise, Jueneman, 08:13
January 03, 1995
- Re: re:Key selectors (Was: Re: submit the documents to the IESG), Jeff Thompson, 23:17
- re:Key selectors (Was: Re: submit the documents to the IESG), warwick (w.s.) ford, 20:24
- Re: Semantics of signatures, multiple and otherwise (Was:Re: limitations of mime-pem transformation, Peter Williams, 19:12
- Re: Key selectors (Was: Re: submit the documents to the IESG), Mr Rhys Weatherley, 19:12
- Re: Semantics of signatures, multiple and otherwise (Was:Re: limitations of mime-pem transformation, Ned Freed, 16:59
- Key selectors (Was: Re: submit the documents to the IESG), Jueneman, 16:45
- Semantics of signatures, multiple and otherwise (Was:Re: limitations of mime-pem transformation, Jueneman, 14:52
- Re: keyid, and privacy, and interworking, Peter Williams, 13:13
- Re: PK identifier issue, Ned Freed, 08:49
- Re: keyid, and privacy, and interworking, John Linn, 06:11
- Re: Canonical forms (Was: Re: PEM/MIME Encryption), Christian Huitema, 03:11
January 02, 1995
- Re: keyid, and privacy, and interworking, James M Galvin, 15:50
- Re: exposed public keys in databases, James M Galvin, 15:14
- key selectors - what more can we say, James M Galvin, 15:03
- Re: hiding public key (was: limitations of mime-pem transformation), James M Galvin, 14:43
- Re: Key selector survey, James M Galvin, 14:20
January 01, 1995
- Re: Vote early (but, please, not often), Ned Freed, 15:20
- Re: re:Key selector survey, Richard . Ankney, 14:09
- Re: re:Key selector survey, warwick (w.s.) ford, 09:53
- keyid, and privacy, and interworking, Peter Williams, 04:06