On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 06:30:07AM +0900, Dan Kogai wrote:
On Monday, March 25, 2002, at 06:05 , Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
Static builds versus Encode solved; good news is that no changes at
Encode side required, I just needed to teach Configure a bit. One
thing, though, to keep in mind in future: Encode subextensions should
stick to (as it now does)
Encode/Foo/Foo.xs
naming, so that Configure can easily locate the subextensions.
Glad to hear that. Well, to be more exact,
Encode/Foo/Foo.xs
do not exist at first; they are autogenerated via
Encode/Foo/Makefile.PL
Argh, urkh, yes, stupid me.
So they are guaranteed to be "Foo/Foo" form unless Makefile.PL is
bleached in some way.
Dan the Encode Maintainer
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
