On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 11:36:33AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 03:58:58AM +0200, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
* rename gb2312 to gb2312-raw, ksc5601 to ksc5601-raw
-raw sounds funny, as if it were somehow "unprocessed" version.
How about -strict?
the -raw was my original suggestion. Anton however has a different
proposal:
Anton> Autrijus, will you allow me to advocate
Anton> GB_2312-80
Anton> for the 7-bit GB 2312?
Anton> li s is the name used both in the IANA registry and rfc 1345.
I'm okay either way. But not 'strict' please; unprocessed versions
are simply what they are.
Personally, I'd say go for '-raw'.
Fine by me, given my non-existent knowledge on the matter :-)
/Autrijus/
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
