Procmail (date)
December 30, 2001
- Re: Procmail won't use existing mailbox, Luke Holton, 20:30
- RE: this recipe generating a one-byte email message..., Professional Software Engineering, 16:51
- Re: Procmail won't use existing mailbox, Professional Software Engineering, 16:49
- RE: this recipe generating a one-byte email message..., David Vrona, 15:02
- Re: Procmail won't use existing mailbox, David W. Tamkin, 14:54
- Re: Procmail won't use existing mailbox, Luke Holton, 14:38
- Re: this recipe generating a one-byte email message..., Professional Software Engineering, 14:05
- Re: Procmail won't use existing mailbox, Professional Software Engineering, 13:58
- Procmail won't use existing mailbox, Luke Holton, 13:45
- Re: this recipe generating a one-byte email message..., David W. Tamkin, 13:28
- this recipe generating a one-byte email message..., David Vrona, 12:37
- Spamassassin + procmail setup, Nils Vogels, 07:07
- Re: comsat to work with procmail, Dallman Ross, 03:05
- Re: comsat to work with procmail, Dallman Ross, 03:01
- RE: most efficient way to get rid of all headers except 3, Gary Funck, 02:47
- Re: most efficient way to get rid of all headers except 3, Philip Guenther, 02:17
- RE: most efficient way to get rid of all headers except 3, Gary Funck, 01:01
December 29, 2001
- Quota + Sendmail + Procmail, Sonny Kupka, 22:10
- comsat to work with procmail, Scott Bradner, 21:54
- most efficient way to get rid of all headers except 3, Timothy J. Luoma, 20:06
- Re: Problems delivering to a directory, David W. Tamkin, 08:08
- man formail question, Harry Putnam, 04:01
- .forward-in-Solaris2.7, mahmoodi, 03:47
- Comments on an idea - writing to a file from two procmailrcs, Harry Putnam, 01:31
December 28, 2001
- Re: Nesting INCLUDERC's..., Ashton MacAndrews, 23:59
- RE: Problems delivering to a directory, Gary Funck, 21:47
- Problems delivering to a directory, Timothy J. Luoma, 20:52
- RE: copying all mail matching a number of recipes to a single folder, Gary Funck, 12:09
- RE: 2 separate mailboxes for each mail list, Gary Funck, 11:40
- RE: 2 separate mailboxes for each mail list, Gary Funck, 11:21
- Accented filename, Matheus Soares, 11:09
- Re: What is wrong here?, David Collantes, 10:55
- Re: 2 separate mailboxes for each mail list, 2sheds, 10:55
- Re: What is wrong here?, Martin McCarthy, 10:14
- Re: What is wrong here?, David Collantes, 09:57
- Re: What is wrong here?, Martin McCarthy, 09:42
- Re: What is wrong here?, David Collantes, 09:22
- Re: What is wrong here?, David Collantes, 07:48
- Re: What is wrong here?, Martin McCarthy, 07:23
- Re: What is wrong here?, David Collantes, 07:03
- Re: What is wrong here?, Martin McCarthy, 06:53
- Re: What is wrong here?, David Collantes, 06:32
- Re: 2 separate mailboxes for each mail list, Timothy J. Luoma, 05:22
- Re: What is wrong here?, Martin McCarthy, 02:43
- 2 separate mailboxes for each mail list, 2sheds, 02:33
December 27, 2001
- What is wrong here?, David Collantes, 23:16
- Regarding old TO/CC variable RC file, Rav3n, 20:26
- Re: old procmail as LDA, new procmail in .forward ?, David W. Tamkin, 19:55
- old procmail as LDA, new procmail in .forward ?, Timothy J. Luoma, 16:33
- recipe with MATCH tuning, Nuno Teixeira, 14:57
- Re: problem with a test script, Bill Tangren, 12:31
- Re: problem with a test script, Professional Software Engineering, 12:25
- problem with a test script, Bill Tangren, 11:05
- Re: Where to put INCLUDERC ?, Tim Luoma, 10:59
- RE: Spams bypassing procmail based filtering, Paul Thomas, 01:36
- RE: splitting up huge mailbox (was mail assistance please), Gary Funck, 01:10
- RE: copying all mail matching a number of recipes to a single folder, Gary Funck, 01:04
- Re: splitting up huge mailbox (was mail assistance please), David W. Tamkin, 00:49
- Re: Nesting INCLUDERC's..., David W. Tamkin, 00:39
- Re: Maildir Format, Mike Horwath, 00:33
- Where to put INCLUDERC ?, Rene Verharen, 00:29
- Filter on senders name instead of senders address, Rene Verharen, 00:28
- Re: Sorting Archived Mail by Source Folder and Date, Biju Chacko, 00:19
- mailbox too big ?, Olaf Menkens, 00:15
- use of INCLUDE, Carolyn G. Fidelman, 00:11
December 26, 2001
- RE: splitting up huge mailbox (was mail assistance please), Gary Funck, 23:59
- Re: Nesting INCLUDERC's..., Paul Thomas, 22:33
- splitting up huge mailbox (was mail assistance please), David W. Tamkin, 22:17
- Re: Delivery to pipe from variable, David W. Tamkin, 21:20
- Re: Nesting INCLUDERC's..., Paul Thomas, 20:57
- Delivery to pipe from variable, John D. Hardin, 20:39
- RE: Spams bypassing procmail based filtering, Gary Funck, 20:00
- Re: mail assistance please, Gary Funck, 19:56
- Re: Nesting INCLUDERC's..., David W. Tamkin, 18:30
- Re: Nesting INCLUDERC's..., Paul Thomas, 17:39
- Re: How to recieve Mails without creating REAL users?, Tim Luoma, 16:21
- How to recieve Mails without creating REAL users?, Newsletter, 14:01
- Re: Nesting INCLUDERC's..., David W. Tamkin, 12:44
- RE: Fixing up broken headers how?, Gary Funck, 12:35
- RE: Fixing up broken headers how?, Gary Funck, 11:29
- RE: Fixing up broken headers how?, Trevor Jenkins, 04:35
- Re: Error while writing to, Paul Thomas, 01:56
December 25, 2001
- Error while writing to, Steve Sykes, 23:46
- RE: Spams bypassing procmail based filtering, Paul Thomas, 15:10
- Nesting INCLUDERC's..., Paul Thomas, 15:02
- Re: Editing incoming data - a technique check, Harry Putnam, 12:59
- RE: Spams bypassing procmail based filtering, Gary Funck, 12:21
- RE: Fixing up broken headers how?, Gary Funck, 11:56
- Re: Editing incoming data - a technique check, David W. Tamkin, 11:31
- Re: Editing incoming data - a technique check, Harry Putnam, 10:32
- Re: Editing incoming data - a technique check, Tim Luoma, 09:58
- Editing incoming data - a technique check, Harry Putnam, 09:44
- Fixing up broken headers how?, Trevor Jenkins, 03:39
- RE: $DEFAULT, Paul Thomas, 02:10
December 24, 2001
- RE: $DEFAULT, Steve Sykes, 23:46
- Re: $DEFAULT, David W. Tamkin, 19:15
- $DEFAULT, Steve Sykes, 19:03
- Spams bypassing procmail based filtering, Paul Thomas, 16:05
- Re: Maildir Format, Tuc, 06:27
- Re: Maildir Format, Tuc, 06:27
- Re: Elusive -m flag, Harry Putnam, 03:06
December 23, 2001
- Re: Maildir Format, Paul Chvostek, 22:40
- Re: Maildir Format, dreamwvr(_at_)dreamwvr(_dot_)com, 22:18
- Re: Maildir Format, Tuc, 15:46
- Elusive -m flag, Harry Putnam, 12:12
- Re: Where to put INCLUDERC ?, Timothy J. Luoma, 04:57
- Where to put INCLUDERC ?, Rene Verharen, 04:27
- Filter on senders name instead of senders address, Rene Verharen, 04:26
December 22, 2001
- Re: copying all mail matching a number of recipes to a single folder, R P Herrold, 20:16
- Re: copying all mail matching a number of recipes to a single folder, Andrew Edelstein, 19:41
- Re: When to lock?, Andrew Edelstein, 19:37
- Re: How to setup Auto reply, Andrew Edelstein, 19:25
- Re: Maildir Format, Andrew Edelstein, 19:23
- Re: copying all mail matching a number of recipes to a single folder, Timothy J. Luoma, 19:17
- Re: copying all mail matching a number of recipes to a single folder, Andrew Edelstein, 19:02
- Re: what does 1^0 mean ?, David W. Tamkin, 16:15
- Re: what does 1^0 mean ?, Don Hammond, 15:13
- Re: Block File Attach.., John D. Hardin, 09:27
- Block File Attach.., Roy Barte, 06:18
December 21, 2001
- how to feed an automated msg back to person ?, Jamie MacDonald, 17:20
- Re: what does 1^0 mean ?, Professional Software Engineering, 16:05
- Re: Recipe matching, Professional Software Engineering, 16:05
- Re: Recipe matching, Rick Leir EPS, 14:56
- Re: what does 1^0 mean ?, Rick Leir EPS, 14:41
- Re: When to lock?, Professional Software Engineering, 13:24
- RE: Sorting Archived Mail by Source Folder and Date, Gary Funck, 11:39
- When to lock?, Jed Record, 11:36
December 20, 2001
- How to setup Auto reply, root, 23:53
- Sorting Archived Mail by Source Folder and Date, Biju Chacko, 23:53
- Sorting Archived Mail by Source Folder and Date, Shanker Balan, 23:35
- Re: what does 1^0 mean ?, CaT, 22:38
- Re: what does 1^0 mean ?, David W. Tamkin, 22:34
- Re: what does 1^0 mean ?, Professional Software Engineering, 21:58
- Re: what does 1^0 mean ?, CaT, 21:16
- Re: what does 1^0 mean ?, David W. Tamkin, 21:10
- Re: what does 1^0 mean ?, parv, 20:55
- Re: what does 1^0 mean ?, CaT, 20:27
- Re: what does 1^0 mean ?, David W. Tamkin, 20:08
- Re: what does 1^0 mean ?, parv, 16:20
- Re: what does 1^0 mean ?, David W. Tamkin, 13:55
- Re: what does 1^0 mean ?, Don Hammond, 05:46
- Re: Maildir Format, dreamwvr(_at_)dreamwvr(_dot_)com, 01:11
- Re: what does 1^0 mean ?, parv, 00:07
- Re: Maildir Format, Paul Chvostek, 00:03
December 19, 2001
- Re: what does 1^0 mean ?, Don Hammond, 23:18
- Re: what does 1^0 mean ?, Don Hammond, 23:14
- Re: what does 1^0 mean ?, CaT, 22:10
- Re: what does 1^0 mean ?, Don Hammond, 21:53
- Re: what does 1^0 mean ?, parv, 19:39
- Re: what does 1^0 mean ?, Professional Software Engineering, 19:37
- what does 1^0 mean ?, Peter Pilsl, 19:04
- Re: Configuration question: Procmail not responding, Professional Software Engineering, 18:50
- Re: Configuration question: Procmail not responding, Philip Guenther, 18:29
- Re: Configuration question: Procmail not responding, Professional Software Engineering, 16:27
- Re: problems with procmailrc, Professional Software Engineering, 16:26
- Maildir Format, Tuc, 14:32
- Re: Configuration question: Procmail not responding, Os Tyler, 13:07
- problems with procmailrc, Max, 11:15
- Re: starting procmail, David W. Tamkin, 09:57
- Re: Recipe matching, Professional Software Engineering, 09:54
- Re: Recipe matching, High Flight, 09:01
- Re: starting procmail, Dallman Ross, 04:10
- starting procmail, Ruediger Stark, 02:08
- Re: Recipe matching, Paul Chvostek, 00:18
December 18, 2001
- Re: Configuration question: /etc/procmailrcs/virtualhost1, Professional Software Engineering, 23:05
- Configuration question: /etc/procmailrcs/virtualhost1, Os Tyler, 20:00
- Re: mail already marked read in Kmail, Professional Software Engineering, 16:24
- Re: copying all mail matching a number of recipes to a single folder, Martin McCarthy, 15:45
- copying all mail matching a number of recipes to a single folder, Eric Smith, 15:24
- mail already marked read in Kmail, Brian Henerey, 15:07
- Re: Setup problem, Professional Software Engineering, 14:50
- Re: acceptlists, blacklists, spam, and twits, oh my! (was: Re: Certified Mail Delivery agent), Professional Software Engineering, 14:48
- Re: Recipe matching, High Flight, 14:33
- Re: Recipe matching, Bart Schaefer, 11:39
- Re: Recipe matching, David W. Tamkin, 10:20
- Re: Recipe matching, Paul Chvostek, 10:16
- Re: acceptlists, blacklists, spam, and twits, oh my! (was: Re: Certified Mail Delivery agent), Rick Leir EPS, 07:43
- RE: Recipe matching, Dallman Ross, 04:48
- Re: Error while writing to "bla bla..., Paul Thomas, 03:02
- Re: Setup problem, Mark Lucas, 02:13
- Re: Recipe matching, Paul Chvostek, 00:33
- Re: Muliple sub-folders archive, Paul Chvostek, 00:13
- Re: Muliple sub-folders archive, Professional Software Engineering, 00:10
December 17, 2001
- Muliple sub-folders archive, Dave Greco, 23:41
- Re: Error while writing to "bla bla..., Paul Chvostek, 23:34
- Re: Error while writing to "bla bla..., Paul Thomas, 22:24
- Error while writing to "bla bla..., Paul Thomas, 20:41
- Re: .procmailrc + .maildelivery, Professional Software Engineering, 13:38
- Re: Setup problem, Professional Software Engineering, 13:22
- Re: .procmailrc + .maildelivery, peter, 13:18
- Digest Subscription, Dave Greco, 12:40
- Re: .procmailrc + .maildelivery, Professional Software Engineering, 12:16
- Re: Setup problem, Professional Software Engineering, 12:14
- Re: Recipe matching, High Flight, 11:06
- .procmailrc + .maildelivery, peter, 10:15
- RE: Confused by bad var's result, Dallman Ross, 09:41
- Header munging, Justin Shore, 09:37
- RE: Recipe matching, Dallman Ross, 09:17
- Re: procmail and virus, Bart Schaefer, 08:22
- Re: Recipe matching, David W. Tamkin, 07:18
- Re: Recipe matching, David W. Tamkin, 07:16
- Re: Confused by bad var's result, Martin McCarthy, 06:19
- Confused by bad var's result, Dallman Ross, 05:44
- Re: Setup problem, Mark Lucas, 05:39
- RE: Recipe matching, Dallman Ross, 05:02
- Re: Recipe matching, Udi Mottelo, 04:15
- Re: procmail and virus, John Conover, 04:12
- Re: procmail and virus, Udi Mottelo, 03:24
- Re: Recipe matching, Dallman Ross, 01:40
- more on procmail on cygwin, Greg Matheson, 01:20
December 16, 2001
- Re: horribly slow converting 3.4mb of news to mail, Harry Putnam, 22:21
- Re: A word on UNIX permissions regarding ./forward and ./procmailrc, Mark, 21:26
- Re: procmail diagnostic shell script?, Professional Software Engineering, 19:43
- Re: procmail diagnostic shell script?, Professional Software Engineering, 19:41
- Re: Coredump on large emails (SOLUTION!), Tuc, 18:42
- Re: procmail diagnostic shell script?, R P Herrold, 17:55
- Re: procmail diagnostic shell script?, Don Hammond, 17:02
- Re: horribly slow converting 3.4mb of news to mail, Professional Software Engineering, 14:33
- Re: procmail diagnostic shell script?, Professional Software Engineering, 14:30
- Re: Setup problem, Professional Software Engineering, 14:29
- Re: procmail diagnostic shell script?, Professional Software Engineering, 14:27
- Recipe matching, High Flight, 12:28
- Re: trouble with HOST, David W. Tamkin, 12:25
- Re: A word on UNIX permissions regarding ./forward and ./procmailrc, David W. Tamkin, 11:36
- Re: procmail diagnostic shell script?, David W. Tamkin, 11:01
- Setup problem, Mark Lucas, 10:19
- Re: Recipe - 2 actions in one rule, Martin McCarthy, 06:26
- Recipe - 2 actions in one rule, Jerry A. Shenk, 05:59
- Re: Permission !!, Stig Brautaset, 05:53
- Re: Block One email Address !!, Stig Brautaset, 05:47
- Re: trouble with HOST, Matt Garretson, 05:41
- Re: procmail diagnostic shell script?, Martin McCarthy, 05:34
- Re: procmail diagnostic shell script?, Martin McCarthy, 05:21
- Re: horribly slow converting 3.4mb of news to mail, Harry Putnam, 01:38
- A word on UNIX permissions regarding ./forward and ./procmailrc, Mark, 00:24
- Re: horribly slow converting 3.4mb of news to mail, Professional Software Engineering, 00:16
- Re: procmail diagnostic shell script?, Don Hammond, 00:09
December 15, 2001
- horribly slow converting 3.4mb of news to mail, Harry Putnam, 22:47
- procmail diagnostic shell script?, Professional Software Engineering, 20:43
- Re: Permission !!, Professional Software Engineering, 20:39
- Re: Block One email Address !!, 2sheds, 14:26
- Re: converting smtp mail text to mbox?, David W. Tamkin, 12:23
- converting smtp mail text to mbox?, Louis LeBlanc, 11:56
- Permission !!, Mahmood Iqbal Hashmi, 01:53
- Block One email Address !!, Mahmood Iqbal Hashmi, 01:50
December 13, 2001
- trouble with HOST, Matt Garretson, 23:50
- Re: invalid regexp?, Paul Chvostek, 23:10
- Re: mailbounce tool, David W. Tamkin, 22:34
- Re: mailbounce tool, David W. Tamkin, 21:59
- Re: invalid regexp?, David W. Tamkin, 21:56
- Re: trouble with HOST, David W. Tamkin, 21:33
- invalid regexp?, Paul Chvostek, 21:08
- Re: Plussed addresses (Re: Passing RCPT_TO value to procmail), Tim Luoma, 20:56
- Re: mailbounce tool, Tim Luoma, 20:40
- Re: trouble with HOST, Eberhard Lisse, 15:54
- trouble with HOST, Matt Garretson, 15:29
- Re: Plussed addresses (Re: Passing RCPT_TO value to procmail), Professional Software Engineering, 14:33
- Re: jump-through-my-hoops autoresponders, David W. Tamkin, 14:20
- Re: procmail and virus, Lars Hecking, 13:27
- Re: procmail and virus, Udi Mottelo, 13:15
- acceptlists, blacklists, spam, and twits, oh my! (was: Re: Certified Mail Delivery agent), Professional Software Engineering, 11:20
- Re: Large e-mail files and high system load, Professional Software Engineering, 11:16
- Re: Large e-mail files and high system load, David W. Tamkin, 10:52
- Re: procmail and virus, Lars Hecking, 10:52
- Re: procmail and virus, Udi Mottelo, 10:43
- Plussed addresses (Re: Passing RCPT_TO value to procmail), Bart Schaefer, 08:31
- Re: procmail and virus, Lars Hecking, 08:26
- procmail and virus, Dc Ad, 08:11
- Q: Locking file and logfile (some details), Udi Mottelo, 05:57
- Re: mailbounce tool, Dallman Ross, 05:39
- Re: Passing RCPT_TO value to procmail, Mark, 04:30
- Re: Certified Mail Delivery agent, Mark, 03:30
- Re: Passing RCPT_TO value to procmail, Paul Chvostek, 02:43
- Re: mailbounce tool, Paul Chvostek, 02:26
- Passing RCPT_TO value to procmail, Bram Kivenko -- Kivco Consulting Inc., 02:22
- Large e-mail files and high system load, Bill Allaire, 02:14
December 12, 2001
- Re: mailbounce tool, Professional Software Engineering, 23:08
- Re: mailbounce tool, WJCarpenter, 22:35
- Re: mailbounce tool, Andrew Edelstein, 22:24
- Re: mailbounce tool, David W. Tamkin, 22:17
- Re: [announce] mailbounce tool, Andrew Edelstein, 21:26
- Re: Certified Mail Delivery agent, Professional Software Engineering, 21:11
- Re: Certified Mail Delivery agent, David W. Tamkin, 20:38
- Re: mailbounce tool, David W. Tamkin, 20:03
- Re: Certified Mail Delivery agent, Mark, 19:54
- Re: jump-through-my-hoops autoresponders (was Certified Mail Delivery agent), Professional Software Engineering, 19:31
- Re: jump-through-my-hoops autoresponders (was Certified Mail Delivery agent), John Conover, 18:19
- jump-through-my-hoops autoresponders (was Certified Mail Delivery agent), David W. Tamkin, 17:35
- RE: [announce] mailbounce tool, WJCarpenter, 17:28
- Re: Missing action:, David W. Tamkin, 14:12
- Re: [Solved] variable=| not assigned to STDOUT, David W. Tamkin, 14:06
- Re: understanding (mis)filtering, David W. Tamkin, 13:32
- Re: Spambouncer, Steve Sykes, 12:19
- Re: Q: When locking report looks different in the log, Professional Software Engineering, 11:24
- Re: Missing action:, Professional Software Engineering, 11:22
- Q: When locking report looks different in the log, Udi Mottelo, 09:04
- Re: Missing action:, Andrew Edelstein, 08:24
- Missing action:, sherzodR, 08:18
- Re: Spambouncer, Matthew G. Saroff, 07:45
- Re: Spambouncer, Eberhard Lisse, 06:51
- Re: Spambouncer, Andrew Edelstein, 05:14
- Spambouncer, Steve Sykes, 04:47
- [Solved] Re: variable=| not assigned to STDOUT, Mark J. Bynum, 04:46
- Re: Certified Mail Delivery agent, Professional Software Engineering, 04:04
- Re: Certified Mail Delivery agent, Professional Software Engineering, 04:01
- Re: Certified Mail Delivery agent, John Conover, 03:18
- Re: Certified Mail Delivery agent, Paul Chvostek, 01:10
December 11, 2001
- Re: understanding (mis)filtering, parv, 23:36
- Re: Certified Mail Delivery agent, Professional Software Engineering, 21:01
- Testing filters before putting them into live use, Professional Software Engineering, 21:01
- RE: what if procmail knew about MIME?, Professional Software Engineering, 21:00
- Rel version 1.4.1, John Conover, 20:36
- Certified Mail Delivery agent, John Conover, 20:19
- RE: what if procmail knew about MIME?, Gary Funck, 17:16
- Re: trusted ids for `-f', David W. Tamkin, 15:39
- trusted ids for `-f', Doug Porter, 15:05
- Re: understanding (mis)filtering, Andrew Edelstein, 15:02
- [announce] mailbounce tool, Professional Software Engineering, 14:22
- [announce] mailbounce tool, Professional Software Engineering, 14:15
- Re: Formail and the -f flag, Harry Putnam, 12:42
- Re: understanding (mis)filtering, David W. Tamkin, 12:15
- Re: Not understanding some basics, Professional Software Engineering, 11:07
- Re: understanding (mis)filtering, Udi Mottelo, 10:54
- Re: understanding (mis)filtering, Santiago Vila, 10:48
- understanding (mis)filtering, parv, 10:14
- Re: Formail and the -f flag, David W. Tamkin, 08:49
- Re: Not understanding some basics, mdevin, 06:43
- Re: Procmail: Out of memory as I tried to allocate..., Örjan Persson, 04:55
- Re: Formail and the -f flag, Martin McCarthy, 03:47
- Not understanding some basics, C. Porter Bassett, 03:24
- Re: Procmail: Out of memory as I tried to allocate..., Santiago Vila, 03:02
- Formail and the -f flag, Harry Putnam, 02:50
- Re: Match operator and massive regex, Harry Putnam, 02:27
- Re: Is my procmail working, Andrew Edelstein, 00:22
- Re: Is my procmail working, Professional Software Engineering, 00:22
- Re: Problems in Procmail package instalation, Professional Software Engineering, 00:12
- Re: what if procmail knew about MIME?, Paul Chvostek, 00:02
December 10, 2001
- Problems in Procmail package instalation, Kada RajaSekhar, 23:29
- Is my procmail working, Kada RajaSekhar, 21:36
- Re: what if procmail knew about MIME?, Professional Software Engineering, 21:06
- Re:what if procmail knew about MIME?, Charlie Summers, 19:49
- Re: Procmail: Out of memory as I tried to allocate..., orange, 19:39
- what if procmail knew about MIME?, Gary Funck, 19:28
- Procmail: Out of memory as I tried to allocate..., RaZ0R 3dG3, 18:00
- Re: program samples, Professional Software Engineering, 16:03
- Re: procmail problem, Professional Software Engineering, 16:01
- Re: procmail cannot write to directories, C. Porter Bassett, 14:42
- Re: variable=| not assigned to STDOUT, Professional Software Engineering, 13:51
- Re: procmail cannot write to directories, Martin McCarthy, 13:42
- procmail cannot write to directories, C. Porter Bassett, 13:29
- Re: variable=| not assigned to STDOUT, David W. Tamkin, 12:45
- procmail problem, Sudip Hore, 12:12
- program samples, Jeebachh Mandal, 12:09
- RE: [Esa-l] ANN: Sanitizer update (1.132), Paul McHale, 12:06
- Re: variable=| not assigned to STDOUT, Martin McCarthy, 11:56
- Re: Executing programs in a procmail script, David W. Tamkin, 11:45
- variable=| not assigned to STDOUT, Mark J. Bynum, 11:38
- Re: Executing programs in a procmail script, Martin McCarthy, 10:44
- Re: Executing programs in a procmail script, David W. Tamkin, 10:28
- Re: Executing programs in a procmail script, John Conover, 04:24
- Re: Executing programs in a procmail script, Martin McCarthy, 03:31
- Re: Executing programs in a procmail script, Philip Guenther, 03:27
- Re: Executing programs in a procmail script, Paul Chvostek, 02:43
- Executing programs in a procmail script, John Conover, 01:58
December 09, 2001
- Re: Match operator and massive regex, Philip Guenther, 23:42
- Re: comsat notifications, Philip Guenther, 23:30
- Re: badtrans again, parv, 23:01
- Re: Auth...port 113 request to clients, Professional Software Engineering, 12:17
- Re: Auth...port 113 request to clients, Don Hammond, 12:03
- Switchrc question, Tim Rice, 10:30
- Auth...port 113 request to clients, Roberto Campos, 09:33
- Re: badtrans again, Dallman Ross, 05:27
December 08, 2001
- Re: badtrans again, Tim Rice, 21:02
- dot on line by itself... removal, Harry Putnam, 20:28
- Re: stripping MATCH's right hand side, David W. Tamkin, 14:34
- Re: badtrans again, Don Hammond, 12:25
- Re: badtrans again, Dallman Ross, 11:49
- Re: badtrans again, Charlie Summers, 11:37
- Re: stripping MATCH's right hand side, Paul Chvostek, 11:16
- Re: badtrans again, Dallman Ross, 10:25
- Re: badtrans again, Peter Pilsl, 10:05
- Re: badtrans again, Dallman Ross, 10:03
- Re: badtrans again, George Chelidze, 09:36
- badtrans again, Edward Bishop, 07:17
- RE: Coredump on large emails, Gary Funck, 00:24
December 07, 2001
- Re: Coredump on large emails, Tuc, 20:11
- Re: Coredump on large emails, Tuc, 19:40
- Re: stripping MATCH's right hand side, David W. Tamkin, 13:52
- extracting names of all attachments, Eric Smith, 13:48
- Re: stripping MATCH's right hand side, David W. Tamkin, 13:43
- Re: help with recipe, Professional Software Engineering, 13:37
- Re: stripping MATCH's right hand side, Paul Chvostek, 13:17
- Re: stripping MATCH's right hand side, Paul Chvostek, 13:00
- Re: stripping MATCH's right hand side, Martin McCarthy, 12:45
- Re: help with recipe, Martin McCarthy, 12:39
- Re: stripping MATCH's right hand side, Paul Chvostek, 12:35
- Re: stripping MATCH's right hand side, David W. Tamkin, 12:33
- Hirohito takes Procmail to Hawaii, David W. Tamkin, 12:10
- help with recipe, Michael Geier, 11:55
- Re: stripping MATCH's right hand side, Martin McCarthy, 11:26
- Re: comsat notifications, Paul Chvostek, 10:29
- stripping MATCH's right hand side, Paul Chvostek, 10:27
- Re: comsat notifications, Martin McCarthy, 10:17
- Re: comsat notifications, Professional Software Engineering, 10:11
- Hagrid takes Procmail to Hogwarts, Dave Robbins, 10:06
- comsat notifications, Paul Chvostek, 10:01
December 06, 2001
- Sorting nntp data stream, what about dot., Harry Putnam, 22:39
- Re: no permission to execute, Matt Eaton, 22:19
- RE: Coredump on large emails, Gary Funck, 20:05
- RE: Coredump on large emails, Gary Funck, 19:50
- Re: HP-UX 11.00 Re: procmail install, R P Herrold, 18:40
- HP-UX 11.00 Re: procmail install, R P Herrold, 17:49
- procmail install, Sudip Hore, 17:05
- Re: Coredump on large emails, Tuc, 16:56
- procmail problem, Sudip Hore, 16:02
- Re: matching variables, Niko Hiebaum, 12:34
- Re: [procmail] RE: reprocessing mail, Dallman Ross, 12:18
- Re: new question Re: why is >> making files size=0 ?, Professional Software Engineering, 11:16
- Re: check filtered stream but deliver unfiltered, Richard G. Ball, 10:48
- Re: check filtered stream but deliver unfiltered, David W. Tamkin, 10:18
- new question Re: why is >> making files size=0 ?, Tim Luoma, 09:50
- Re: [procmail] RE: reprocessing mail, R P Herrold, 09:33
- Re: check filtered stream but deliver unfiltered, Bart Schaefer, 09:13
- Re: [procmail] RE: reprocessing mail, Dallman Ross, 09:10
- Re: check filtered stream but deliver unfiltered, Richard G. Ball, 08:44
- Re: [Esa-l] ANN: Sanitizer update (1.132), John D. Hardin, 08:24
- Re: [procmail] RE: reprocessing mail, R P Herrold, 08:03
- Re: matching variables, David W. Tamkin, 07:55
- Re: Breaking news alerts (procmail and sed), David W. Tamkin, 07:52
- Re: check filtered stream but deliver unfiltered, David W. Tamkin, 07:50
- matching variables, Nikolaus Hiebaum, 05:32
- RE: reprocessing mail, Dallman Ross, 04:20
- Re: Breaking news alerts (procmail and sed), Paul Chvostek, 02:05
- pm lint?, Paul Chvostek, 01:27
- Re: check filtered stream but deliver unfiltered, Professional Software Engineering, 00:11
December 05, 2001
- Re: Breaking news alerts (procmail and sed), Paul Thomas, 23:24
- Re: check filtered stream but deliver unfiltered, David W. Tamkin, 22:40
- ANN: Sanitizer update (1.132), John D. Hardin, 21:47
- Re: check filtered stream but deliver unfiltered, Professional Software Engineering, 18:41
- Re: Breaking news alerts (procmail and sed), Professional Software Engineering, 18:39
- Re: Coredump on large emails, Cliff Sarginson, 18:02
- Re: Match operator and massive regex, Harry Putnam, 17:46
- Re: Breaking news alerts (procmail and sed), David W. Tamkin, 16:30
- Re: Breaking news alerts (procmail and sed), SoloCDM, 13:34
- Re: Breaking news alerts (procmail and sed), Paul Thomas, 12:19
- Re: check filtered stream but deliver unfiltered, Bart Schaefer, 12:04
- Re: New mail ownership problem, Andy Arbon, 11:58
- Re: Breaking news alerts (procmail and sed), Professional Software Engineering, 11:32
- Re: check filtered stream but deliver unfiltered, Professional Software Engineering, 11:27
- RE: reprocessing mail, Gary Funck, 10:46
- RE: Coredump on large emails, Gary Funck, 10:36
- Re: Match operator and massive regex, Harry Putnam, 10:07
- Re: no permission to execute, Ruben Safir, 09:16
- Re: no permission to execute, David W. Tamkin, 09:10
- Re: no permission to execute, Ruben Safir, 09:06
- Re: Match operator and massive regex, Martin McCarthy, 08:54
- Breaking news alerts (procmail and sed), Timothy J. Luoma, 08:52
- check filtered stream but deliver unfiltered, Richard G. Ball, 08:50
- Re: Coredump on large emails, Tuc, 08:32
- Re: Coredump on large emails, Dallman Ross, 03:42
- Re: no permission to execute, Professional Software Engineering, 01:39
- Re: how to get the attachment part?, Professional Software Engineering, 01:36
- how to get the attachment part?, Andreas Sartori, 00:25
- Re: no permission to execute, Don Hammond, 00:08
December 04, 2001
- Re: no permission to execute, Ruben Safir, 23:49
- Re: no permission to execute, Don Hammond, 21:35
- Re: Match operator and massive regex, Harry Putnam, 21:16
- Coredump on large emails, Tuc, 21:09
- Re: no permission to execute, Matt Eaton, 19:16
- Update for Quarantining Malicious Outlook Attachments, John Conover, 19:14
- Re: Match operator and massive regex, Martin McCarthy, 16:26
- Re: reprocessing mail, Dallman Ross, 16:13
- RE: reprocessing mail, Gary Funck, 15:46
- Re: no permission to execute, Don Hammond, 15:06
- reprocessing mail, bradw, 15:03
- Re: New mail ownership problem, Don Hammond, 14:17
- Re: New mail ownership problem, Martin McCarthy, 14:09
- no permission to execute, Matt Eaton, 13:58
- New mail ownership problem, Andy Arbon, 13:15
- Re: Delete a specific EXE, Professional Software Engineering, 09:50
- RE: file saving, Gary Funck, 09:11
- Re: /var full, using duplicate removing, David W. Tamkin, 08:39
- Re: /var full, using duplicate removing, Bart Schaefer, 08:18
- AW: file saving, Andreas Sartori, 05:49
- Re: Delete a specific EXE, Gregory Berardi, 05:37
- Re: /var full, using duplicate removing, Pixel, 05:25
- Re: why is >> making files size=0 ?, Martin McCarthy, 04:57
- Re: why is >> making files size=0 ?, Martin McCarthy, 04:44
- How to get the attacthement part, A.Johnson Jeba Asir, 03:02
- Re: Delete a specific EXE, Sam Morris, 02:19
- Match operator and massive regex, Harry Putnam, 02:13
- Re: Delete a specific EXE, Robin Edgar, Tripany, 00:51
- Re: Delete a specific EXE, Robin Edgar, Tripany, 00:45
- Re: why is >> making files size=0 ?, Professional Software Engineering, 00:40
- Re: /var full, using duplicate removing, David W. Tamkin, 00:14
- badtrans variant, new signature trap, John D. Hardin, 00:10
- Re: Delete a specific EXE, Charlie Summers, 00:05
December 03, 2001
- Re: /var full, using duplicate removing, Bart Schaefer, 20:04
- Re: why is >> making files size=0 ?, Timothy J. Luoma, 13:40
- Re: why is >> making files size=0 ?, Dallman Ross, 13:37
- RE: file saving, Gary Funck, 10:15
- Re: why is >> making files size=0 ?, Martin McCarthy, 07:30
- why is >> making files size=0 ?, Timothy J. Luoma, 06:56
- /var full, using duplicate removing, Pixel, 04:40
- file saving, Andreas Sartori, 01:24
December 02, 2001
- Re: (resend) Procmail returning -1 (trace of procmail spawned from getmail, Philip Guenther, 20:56
- Re: Failure to write, Professional Software Engineering, 15:47
- Re: Failure to write, George Chelidze, 13:43
- Suggestions for a non expensive (overhead wise) routine, Harry Putnam, 12:24
- Re: Failure to write, Professional Software Engineering, 11:01
- Re: Failure to write, Ruben Safir, 10:55
- Re: Failure to write, David W. Tamkin, 10:49
- Re: notifications, John D. Hardin, 10:29
- Re: notifications, David W. Tamkin, 10:16
- Failure to write, Brooklyn Linux Solutions CEO, 10:13
- Re: notifications, Professional Software Engineering, 10:05
- Re: [procmail] notifications, R P Herrold, 09:13
- notifications, rdicaire, 06:51
- Re: Match X but not Y if is also there, Professional Software Engineering, 00:59
- Re: Match X but not Y if is also there, listuser, 00:18
December 01, 2001
- (resend) Procmail returning -1 (trace of procmail spawned from getmail, Errol Casey, 23:15
- Re: generate delivery file from To: header, Harry Putnam, 23:03
- generate delivery file from To: header, Harry Putnam, 22:40
- Re: Match X but not Y if is also there, David W. Tamkin, 15:18
- Re: handling cross-posters, Professional Software Engineering, 13:30
- RE: handling cross-posters, Gary Funck, 12:57
- Re: handling cross-posters, Stephen Patterson, 07:29
- Re: Delete a specific EXE, Dallman Ross, 05:51
- Re: Detecting "Content-Type: multipart/related;" for virus protection, John Conover, 02:39
- Re: Detecting "Content-Type: multipart/related;" for virus protection, Philip Guenther, 01:48
November 30, 2001
- Re: Detecting "Content-Type: multipart/related;" for virus protection, Professional Software Engineering, 22:55
- Re: Match X but not Y if is also there, Professional Software Engineering, 22:53
- Re: Delete a specific EXE, Professional Software Engineering, 22:53
- Re: Match X but not Y if is also there, Don Hammond, 22:19
- Re: Match X but not Y if is also there, listuser, 21:01
- Re: Delete a specific EXE, Sam, 20:26
- Re: Delete a specific EXE, Professional Software Engineering, 19:33
- Re: Detecting "Content-Type: multipart/related;" for virus protection, John Conover, 18:56
- Re: Delete a specific EXE, Charlie Summers, 18:30
- Re: Delete a specific EXE, Sam, 17:55
- Re: Problems with procmail recipe, Professional Software Engineering, 17:03
- Re: Detecting "Content-Type: multipart/related;" for virus protection, Professional Software Engineering, 17:03