On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, LuKreme wrote:
L> On Friday, Apr 25, 2003, at 13:07 Canada/Mountain, Alan Clifford wrote:
L> > On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, LuKreme wrote:
L> > L> On Wednesday, Apr 23, 2003, at 13:57 Canada/Mountain, Stelios
L> > L> Asmargianakis wrote:
L> > L> > How i can do a rule like the following?
L> > L>
L> > L> You might search for "PYLM" or "Prove you Love me" in the archives.
L> > L> Oh, and expect that many people will not jump through your hoops
L> > just
L> > L> to send you mail.
L> > That is the point - to reduce the amount of mail. Legitimate mail
L> > always
L> > gets through.
L> No, it doesn't. For example, I may have sent you a private reply to
L> your question. If I got back a "prove you love me" request, I'd junk
L> it an you'd never see the reply I sent.
That's OK with me.
After all, I have set the reply-to to the list address and, if you really
must send a personal email, I have provided a to: address below that
would by-pass the the autoresponder and put you in my whitelist. If that
is too difficult for an unsolicited email sender, then so be it.
( Please do not email me AS WELL as replying to the list. Personal
email is welcome but may invoke a password autoresponder - the
current pass-through address is alan+1@ )
procmail mailing list