Procmail (date)
January 26, 2005
- A tip for logging, Udi Mottelo, 08:58
- Re: RBL Lists, was: mimic a unknown user bounce, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 06:57
- Re: RBL Lists, was: mimic a unknown user bounce, Patrick Shanahan, 06:31
- Re: mimic a unknown user bounce, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 05:53
- Re: mimic a unknown user bounce, Patrick Shanahan, 05:36
- Re: Delivery to several directory folders?, Dallman Ross, 05:01
- Re: Delivery to several directory folders?, Udi Mottelo, 04:43
- Re: Delivery to several directory folders?, Dallman Ross, 03:27
- Re: Delivery to several directory folders?, Udi Mottelo, 02:34
- Re: mimic a unknown user bounce, Michelle Konzack, 00:28
January 25, 2005
- Re: mimic a unknown user bounce, Professional Software Engineering, 20:52
- Re: mimic a unknown user bounce, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 18:51
- Re: mimic a unknown user bounce, Patrick Shanahan, 16:03
- RE: Using procmail with no home directory, Adam Lins, 13:17
- Re: mimic a unknown user bounce, Michelle Konzack, 12:35
- Re: mimic a unknown user bounce, Patrick Shanahan, 12:20
- Re: Delivery to several directory folders?, Dallman Ross, 11:48
- Re: Delivery to several directory folders?, Udi Mottelo, 11:00
- Re: OT: Verizon (Was: Re: mimic a unknown user bounce), Michelle Konzack, 10:38
- Re: mimic a unknown user bounce, Michelle Konzack, 10:36
- Re: OT: Verizon (Was: Re: mimic a unknown user bounce), Google Kreme, 10:21
- Re: mimic a unknown user bounce, Google Kreme, 10:19
- Re: mimic a unknown user bounce, Google Kreme, 10:16
- formail seems to eat my attachments, Javier Linares, 10:10
- I dunno if Procmail is Running :(, Miguel !, 09:27
- Re: OT: Verizon (Was: Re: mimic a unknown user bounce), Professional Software Engineering, 09:21
- Re: mimic a unknown user bounce, Professional Software Engineering, 09:21
- Re: Delivery to several directory folders?, Dallman Ross, 09:10
- Delivery to several directory folders?, Udi Mottelo, 08:57
- Re: OT: Verizon (Was: Re: mimic a unknown user bounce), Lars Hecking, 04:16
- Re: mimic a unknown user bounce, Michelle Konzack, 04:11
- Re: mimic a unknown user bounce, Michelle Konzack, 03:53
- Re: Verizon, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 03:36
- OT: Verizon (Was: Re: mimic a unknown user bounce), Dallman Ross, 03:12
- Re: mimic a unknown user bounce, Volker Kuhlmann, 01:04
January 24, 2005
- Re: mimic a unknown user bounce, Professional Software Engineering, 18:39
- RE: Using procmail with no home directory, Dallman Ross, 17:47
- Re: Using procmail with no home directory, Fran Fabrizio, 17:38
- Re: Using procmail with no home directory, Dallman Ross, 17:27
- Re: Using procmail with no home directory, Fran Fabrizio, 17:25
- Re: Using procmail with no home directory, Klaus Johannes Rusch, 17:23
- Using procmail with no home directory, Fran Fabrizio, 17:12
- Re: mimic a unknown user bounce, Volker Kuhlmann, 16:58
- Re: Nested recipes... (sorry if this is sent twice.. ), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 14:59
- Re: set variable as part of action?, David W. Tamkin, 14:56
- set variable as part of action?, David Terrell, 14:04
- Re: mimic a unknown user bounce, Professional Software Engineering, 13:55
- Re: Nested recipes... (sorry if this is sent twice.. ), Dallman Ross, 13:20
- Re: mimic a unknown user bounce, David W. Tamkin, 11:46
- Re: Nested recipes... (sorry if this is sent twice.. ), Glenn Sieb, 11:46
- Re: mimic a unknown user bounce, NM Public, 11:45
- mimic a unknown user bounce, Chris Johnson, 11:23
- Re: Nested recipes... (sorry if this is sent twice.. ), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 09:37
- recasing (was Nested recipes... ), David W. Tamkin, 09:01
- Re: Nested recipes... (sorry if this is sent twice.. ), Dallman Ross, 01:42
- Re: Nested recipes... (sorry if this is sent twice.. ), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 01:33
January 23, 2005
- Re: Nested recipes... (sorry if this is sent twice.. ), Glenn Sieb, 19:34
- Re: Nested recipes... (sorry if this is sent twice.. ), Dallman Ross, 18:43
- Re: Nested recipes... (sorry if this is sent twice.. ), Glenn Sieb, 18:37
- Re: Nested recipes... (sorry if this is sent twice.. ), Dallman Ross, 18:04
- Re: Procmail with Postfix and virtual domains, Ismael Valladolid Torres, 16:51
- Re: Nested recipes... (sorry if this is sent twice.. ), Glenn Sieb, 16:45
- Re: Nested recipes... (sorry if this is sent twice.. ), Dallman Ross, 16:37
- Procmail with Postfix and virtual domains, Andrew Edelstein, 15:08
- Re: Nested recipes... (sorry if this is sent twice.. ), Glenn Sieb, 14:46
- Re: Nested recipes... (sorry if this is sent twice.. ), Dallman Ross, 05:14
January 20, 2005
- RE: Stripping bad attachments, Pettit, Paul, 18:30
- Re: Stripping bad attachments, Google Kreme, 17:53
- RE: Stripping bad attachments, Pettit, Paul, 16:47
- Re: Stripping bad attachments, Google Kreme, 16:22
- RE: Stripping bad attachments, Gary Funck, 15:56
- RE: Stripping bad attachments, Pettit, Paul, 15:30
- Re: Stripping bad attachments, Google Kreme, 13:23
- Stripping bad attachments, Pettit, Paul, 10:27
- Re: Variable names, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 08:38
- Variable names (Was: how to deliver to a file with a unique time-stamped file name, reliably?), NM Public, 04:25
- Re: how to deliver to a file with a unique time-stamped file name, reliably?, Udi Mottelo, 04:14
- Re: how to deliver to a file with a unique time-stamped file name, reliably?, Robert Allerstorfer, 00:40
January 19, 2005
- Re: [ANN] mktime.inc (v1.02, 2005-12-20), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 20:33
- Re: [ANN] mktime.inc (v1.02, 2005-12-20), Dallman Ross, 19:49
- [ANN] mktime.inc (v1.02, 2005-12-20), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 19:46
- Re: lynx command in recipe, David W. Tamkin, 10:54
- Re: lynx command in recipe, Matthew G. Saroff, 08:39
- Re: how to deliver to a file with a unique time-stamped file name, reliably?, Udi Mottelo, 08:04
- Re: how to deliver to a file with a unique time-stamped file name, reliably?, Robert Allerstorfer, 04:15
- RE: how to deliver to a file with a unique time-stamped file name, reliably?, Gary Funck, 01:55
- Re: how to deliver to a file with a unique time-stamped file name, reliably?, Robert Allerstorfer, 01:30
- RE: how to deliver to a file with a unique time-stamped file name, reliably?, Gary Funck, 00:18
January 18, 2005
- Re: lynx command in recipe, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 20:16
- lynx command in recipe, Fradley Bradley, 19:26
- Re: how to deliver to a file with a unique time-stamped file name, reliably?, Google Kreme, 19:12
- Re: how to deliver to a file with a unique time-stamped file name, reliably?, Volker Kuhlmann, 18:52
- Re: how to deliver to a file with a unique time-stamped file name, reliably?, Michael J Wise, 18:52
- RE: how to deliver to a file with a unique time-stamped file name, reliably?, Gary Funck, 17:50
- Re: (no subject), Google Kreme, 15:52
- Re: (no subject), Dallman Ross, 15:50
- Re: 0Spam.com challenge system - problems with list, Michelle Konzack, 08:47
- 0Spam.com challenge system - problems with list, Professional Software Engineering, 08:30
- (no subject), Fradley Bradley, 01:09
January 16, 2005
- Re: "Is /home still owned by adam ?", Adam Bogacki, 21:52
- procmail on a sendmail gateway with aliases, LLCool Jay, 21:27
- Re: How to count "Received:" Header, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 16:23
- Re: How to count "Received:" Header, Dallman Ross, 15:59
- How to count "Received:" Header, linux4michelle, 15:21
- Re: Good evening :) Have a recipe question.., Ruud H.G. van Tol, 13:00
- Re: Good evening :) Have a recipe question.., Glenn Sieb, 11:47
- Re: Good evening :) Have a recipe question.., Glenn Sieb, 11:46
- Re: Good evening :) Have a recipe question.., Ruud H.G. van Tol, 07:06
- Re: Good evening :) Have a recipe question.., Michelle Konzack, 02:23
January 15, 2005
- RE: Good evening :) Have a recipe question.., Gary Funck, 21:00
- Re: Good evening :) Have a recipe question.., Glenn Sieb, 20:39
- RE: Good evening :) Have a recipe question.., Gary Funck, 20:23
- Re: Good evening :) Have a recipe question.., Glenn Sieb, 19:40
- Re: Good evening :) Have a recipe question.., Professional Software Engineering, 19:40
- RE: Good evening :) Have a recipe question.., Gary Funck, 19:40
- Good evening :) Have a recipe question.., Glenn Sieb, 18:19
January 14, 2005
- Re: Can procmail deliver to mbox and maildir for the same user?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 15:33
- Re: Can procmail deliver to mbox and maildir for the same user?, David W. Tamkin, 12:40
- Re: Can procmail deliver to mbox and maildir for the same user?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 08:47
- Re: Can procmail deliver to mbox and maildir for the same user?, David W. Tamkin, 08:28
- Re: Fwd: Mail delivery failed, NM Public, 04:10
- Fwd: Mail delivery failed, Aaron, 03:49
- Re: Can procmail deliver to mbox and maildir for the same user?, NM Public, 03:47
- Can procmail deliver to mbox and maildir for the same user?, Del Stoliker, 00:29
January 12, 2005
- Re: all In one, Aaron, 22:49
- Re: split.inc (v1.01, 2005-01-12), Dr.Ruud, 20:24
- Re: all In one, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 20:07
- Re: remove text from body and change subject and author, Dallman Ross, 18:28
- Re: remove text from body and change subject and author, Dallman Ross, 17:35
- Re: remove text from body and change subject and author, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 13:05
- Re: remove text from body and change subject and author, Fabian Braennstroem, 10:06
- Re: remove text from body and change subject and author, Dallman Ross, 09:12
- Re: remove text from body and change subject and author, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 08:58
- Re: remove text from body and change subject and author, Dallman Ross, 08:21
- Re: remove text from body and change subject and author, Dallman Ross, 08:19
- Re: remove text from body and change subject and author, Fabian Braennstroem, 07:07
- Re: non-INCLUDERC-ing string-splitter, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 06:57
- Re: non-INCLUDERC-ing string-splitter, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 06:55
- Re: non-INCLUDERC-ing string-splitter, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 06:23
- Re: converting tiff attachments, Hans du Plooy, 05:43
- Re: remove text from body and change subject and author, Fabian Braennstroem, 05:43
- Re: remove text from body and change subject and author, Fabian Braennstroem, 05:41
- Re: non-INCLUDERC-ing string-splitter, Dallman Ross, 05:38
January 11, 2005
- Re: non-INCLUDERC-ing string-splitter, Bart Schaefer, 23:42
- Re: split.inc (v1.01, 2005-01-12), David W. Tamkin, 20:44
- Re: non-INCLUDERC-ing string-splitter, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 19:41
- split.inc (v1.01, 2005-01-12), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 19:40
- RE: non-INCLUDERC-ing string-splitter, Dallman Ross, 18:23
- Re: error in recipe, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 16:54
- Re: error in recipe, Dallman Ross, 16:23
- Re: all In one, Aaron, 16:05
- Re: procmail - a condition ..- cruddy mime, Andy, 15:32
- Re: error in recipe, Bart Schaefer, 14:32
- Re: procmail - a condition .. LOOPING OOPS, Dallman Ross, 14:32
- Re: procmail - a condition .. LOOPING OOPS, Dallman Ross, 14:28
- Re: all In one, Professional Software Engineering, 13:39
- all In one, Aaron, 13:18
- Re: error in recipe, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 12:48
- RE: procmail - a condition .. LOOPING OOPS, Andy, 11:38
- Re: error in recipe, Bart Schaefer, 11:36
- Re: procmail - a condition .. LOOPING OOPS, Andy, 11:14
- RE: procmail - a condition .. LOOPING OOPS, Dallman Ross, 11:04
- Re: procmail - a condition .. LOOPING OOPS, Andy, 09:10
- Re: procmail - a condition .. LOOPING OOPS, Dallman Ross, 08:31
- Re: error in recipe, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 08:28
- Re: procmail - a condition to check deliverable and LOOPING, Dallman Ross, 08:18
- Re: is this a LOOP, Professional Software Engineering, 07:52
- Re: error in recipe, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 07:43
- procmail with qmail/vpopmail, Oliver Hankeln, 06:56
- Re: procmail - a condition .. LOOPING OOPS, Andy Heath, 06:56
- is this a LOOP, Andy Heath, 06:33
- Re: error in recipe, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 06:33
- procmail - a condition to check deliverable and LOOPING, Andy Heath, 06:19
- RE: 'Folder: bounced ', Markus Freiling, 02:06
January 10, 2005
- Re: error in recipe, Dallman Ross, 18:26
- Re: error in recipe, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 16:13
- RE: error in recipe, Dallman Ross, 15:44
- Re: error in recipe, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 11:50
- Re: error in recipe, Claus Atzenbeck, 11:23
- Re: error in recipe, Dallman Ross, 11:11
- Re: error in recipe, NM Public, 10:30
- Re: error in recipe, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 10:16
- RE: error in recipe, Gary Funck, 10:14
- error in recipe, Claus Atzenbeck, 09:48
- how to find error, Claus Atzenbeck, 09:32
- RE: 'Folder: bounced ' - the good news., Dallman Ross, 09:10
- Re: 'Folder: bounced ', Ruud H.G. van Tol, 09:06
- Re: remove text from body and change subject and author, Michelle Konzack, 07:52
- RE: 'Folder: bounced ', Dallman Ross, 07:39
- RE: The Password, Dallman Ross, 07:37
- Re: remove text from body and change subject and author, Dallman Ross, 07:03
- Re: converting tiff attachments, Dallman Ross, 06:45
- Re: remove text from body and change subject and author, Fabian Braennstroem, 06:28
- RE: FW: how do I edit the over quota message, Gary Funck, 01:58
- Re: FW: how do I edit the over quota message, Dallman Ross, 01:52
- Re: FW: how do I edit the over quota message, Gerald V. Livingston II, 01:36
- Re: Getting partial matches from a string without forking an outside process, Dallman Ross, 01:27
- Re: FW: how do I edit the over quota message, Dallman Ross, 01:24
January 09, 2005
- Re: 'Folder: bounced ' - the good news., Gerald V. Livingston II, 22:58
- Re: 'Folder: bounced ' - the good news., Adam Bogacki, 22:01
- Re: non-INCLUDERC-ing string-splitter, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 21:54
- Re: Getting partial matches from a string without forking an outside process, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 21:21
- RE: FW: how do I edit the over quota message, Gary Funck, 21:20
- Re: FW: how do I edit the over quota message, Gerald V. Livingston II, 20:46
- Re: Getting partial matches from a string without forking an outside process, Bart Schaefer, 20:41
- Re: FW: how do I edit the over quota message, Patrick Shanahan, 20:21
- non-INCLUDERC-ing string-splitter, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 20:03
- Re: The Password, Gerald V. Livingston II, 19:18
- Re: 'Folder: bounced ', Adam Bogacki, 19:14
- The Password, Adam Bogacki, 18:55
- FW: how do I edit the over quota message, Stuart Clark, 17:40
- converting tiff attachments, Hans du Plooy, 15:10
- Re: Getting partial matches from a string without forking an outside process, Robert Allerstorfer, 13:25
- Re: Getting partial matches from a string without forking an outside process, Dallman Ross, 11:49
- Re: how do I edit the over quota message, Dallman Ross, 11:43
- Re: Getting partial matches from a string without forking an outside process, Dallman Ross, 11:40
- Re: Getting partial matches from a string without forking an outside process, Dallman Ross, 11:35
- Re: Getting partial matches from a string without forking an outside process, Dallman Ross, 11:35
- how do I edit the over quota message, Stuart Clark, 10:53
- Re: Getting partial matches from a string without forking an outside process, Robert Allerstorfer, 07:52
- Re: Getting partial matches from a string without forking an outside process, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 07:08
- Re: Getting partial matches from a string without forking an outside process, Robert Allerstorfer, 07:01
- Re: Getting partial matches from a string without forking an outside process, Dallman Ross, 05:47
- Re: Getting partial matches from a string without forking an outside process, Dallman Ross, 05:44
- Re: remove text from body and change subject and author, Michelle Konzack, 03:37
- Re: Getting partial matches from a string without forking an outside process, Robert Allerstorfer, 03:04
- Re: Getting partial matches from a string without forking an outside process, Robert Allerstorfer, 03:03
- Re: remove text from body and change subject and author, Fabian Braennstroem, 03:01
January 08, 2005
- Re: Getting partial matches from a string without forking an outside process, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 18:52
- Re: remove text from body and change subject and author, Patrick Shanahan, 16:59
- Re: Getting partial matches from a string without forking an outside process, Dallman Ross, 16:34
- Re: Getting partial matches from a string without forking an outside process, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 16:21
- Re: Getting partial matches from a string without forking an outside process, Dallman Ross, 15:45
- Re: Getting partial matches from a string without forking an outside process, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 15:44
- Re: Getting partial matches from a string without forking an outside process, Robert Allerstorfer, 14:07
- Re: Getting partial matches from a string without forking an outside process, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 14:04
- Re: Getting partial matches from a string without forking an outside process, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 13:45
- Getting partial matches from a string without forking an outside process, Robert Allerstorfer, 12:49
- RE: 'Folder: bounced ', Dallman Ross, 12:04
- Re: variable $\{trick}, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 10:07
- Re: variable $\{trick}, David W. Tamkin, 09:11
- Re: Impossibly complex problem, Dallman Ross, 04:40
- variable $\{trick}, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 04:40
- Re: Impossibly complex problem, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 04:32
- The "help offered" web space, Gerald V. Livingston II, 04:03
- Apologies, Dallman., Adam Bogacki, 02:36
January 07, 2005
- Re: remove text from body and change subject and author, Justin Gombos, 23:25
- Impossibly complex problem, Justin Gombos, 23:16
- Re: 'Folder: bounced ', Ruud H.G. van Tol, 22:32
- Help offered [WAS: Re: 'Folder: bounced '], Gerald V. Livingston II, 14:48
- Re: 'Folder: bounced ', Dallman Ross, 13:19
- Re: 'Folder: bounced ', Ruud H.G. van Tol, 10:46
- Re: 'Folder: bounced ', Benjamin A'Lee, 09:51
- Re: 'Folder: bounced ', NM Public, 09:21
- remove text from body and change subject and author, Fabian Braennstroem, 02:31
January 06, 2005
- Re: 'Folder: bounced ', Adam Bogacki, 21:00
- Re: 'Folder: bounced ', Dallman Ross, 17:49
- 'Folder: bounced ', Adam Bogacki, 16:31
- Re: nother procmail rule question, kurtz, 12:29
- Re: nother procmail rule question, sc2, 12:25
- Re: nother procmail rule question, Dallman Ross, 12:18
- nother procmail rule question, sc2, 12:07
- Re: rules questions, sc2, 11:48
- Re: Trouble with scoring (Was: Re: Need regex-help: inverted word search), R A Lichtensteiger, 11:25
- Re: rules questions, Dallman Ross, 07:30
- Re: rules questions, kurtz, 07:30
- rules questions, sc2, 06:12
- Re: 'Folder: bounced ', Dallman Ross, 05:07
- Re: 'Folder: bounced ', Adam Bogacki, 02:19
- Re: 'Folder: bounced ', Adam Bogacki, 02:04
- Re: Trouble with scoring (Was: Re: Need regex-help: inverted word search), Andreas Schmidt, 01:43
January 05, 2005
- Re: 'Folder: bounced ', Dallman Ross, 15:28
- Re: Trouble with scoring (Was: Re: Need regex-help: inverted word search), Dallman Ross, 13:37
- Re: Trouble with scoring (Was: Re: Need regex-help: inverted word search), Dallman Ross, 13:34
- Re: Trouble with scoring (Was: Re: Need regex-help: inverted word search), Professional Software Engineering, 10:32
- Re: Trouble with scoring (Was: Re: Need regex-help: inverted word search), Andreas Schmidt, 10:18
- Re: Trouble with scoring (Was: Re: Need regex-help: inverted word search), R A Lichtensteiger, 09:11
- Re: pipes in procmailrc, R A Lichtensteiger, 09:05
- Re: how to use file to block several user, R A Lichtensteiger, 09:04
- pipes in procmailrc, Vincent Blondel, 06:02
- how to use file to block several user, Rakesh Man Karmacharya, 06:00
- Re: 'Folder: bounced ', Ruud H.G. van Tol, 05:45
- Trouble with scoring (Was: Re: Need regex-help: inverted word search), Andreas Schmidt, 05:21
- Re: 'Folder: bounced ', Adam Bogacki, 02:33
January 04, 2005
- Re: Matching exactly 3 times on regexp, kurtz, 12:55
- Re: Matching exactly 3 times on regexp, Professional Software Engineering, 12:09
- Re: Matching exactly 3 times on regexp, kurtz, 11:15
- Re: Matching exactly 3 times on regexp, Dallman Ross, 10:56
- Matching exactly 3 times on regexp, kurtz, 10:24
- Re: 'Folder: bounced', Dallman Ross, 03:23