SPF Discuss (date)
December 23, 2003
- Re: I'm just learning about SPF and I have a few questions, R. Scott Perry, 18:09
- Re: I'm just learning about SPF and I have a few qu estions., Greg Connor, 17:16
- Re: I'm just learning about SPF and I have a few qu estions., Hans Dieter Pearcey, 12:28
- RE: I'm just learning about SPF and I have a few qu estions., Greg Connor, 12:11
- Ability not policy [was: Maybe simple question], Lee Carver (me), 12:05
- RE: I'm just learning about SPF and I have a few qu estions., Steven W. Orr, 11:18
- RE: I'm just learning about SPF and I have a few qu estions., Marc Alaia, 10:53
- I'm just learning about SPF and I have a few questions., Steven W. Orr, 10:49
December 22, 2003
- RE: Maybe simple question, Greg Connor, 17:27
- RE: DDoS attacks via SPF, Dustin D. Trammell, 12:39
- RE: about the SPF registry, Dustin D. Trammell, 12:28
- Re: Maybe simple question, Meng Weng Wong, 10:36
- Re: Mapping to RBL style DNS lookup, Philip Gladstone, 08:42
- RE: Maybe simple question, Edward Ned Harvey, 06:53
December 21, 2003
- Re: Handling MX secondaries, Meng Weng Wong, 22:27
- Re: Mapping to RBL style DNS lookup, Mark, 21:51
- Re: Handling MX secondaries, wayne, 20:54
- Handling MX secondaries, Philip Gladstone, 20:10
- Mapping to RBL style DNS lookup, Philip Gladstone, 17:01
- RE: vernon schryver, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:29
- RE: What is LMAP, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:16
- Re: What is LMAP, wayne, 10:49
- Re: What is LMAP, wayne, 10:44
- Re: What is LMAP, Meng Weng Wong, 09:51
- Re: The Forwarding Problem: review, Wechsler, 08:45
- RE: Arguments regarding "complexity", Marc Alaia, 07:53
- What is LMAP, Greg Connor, 04:39
- RE: The Forwarding Problem: review, Arik Baratz, 04:23
- Re: Arguments regarding "complexity", Greg Connor, 04:18
December 20, 2003
- Re: Arguments regarding "complexity", Philip Gladstone, 21:06
- Re: The Forwarding Problem: review, Wechsler, 14:47
- Re: Arguments regarding "complexity", Mark, 13:31
- Re: Arguments regarding "complexity", wayne, 13:00
- third-party DNS SPF interface, Meng Weng Wong, 11:21
- The Forwarding Problem: review, Meng Weng Wong, 11:12
- Re: Arguments regarding "complexity", Mark, 07:39
- Re: Arguments regarding "complexity", Wechsler, 02:26
- Re: Arguments regarding "complexity", Richard George, 02:02
- Re: Arguments regarding "complexity", Wechsler, 01:49
December 19, 2003
- Re: DDoS attacks via SPF, Mark Jason Dominus, 13:58
- Re: vernon schryver, wayne, 13:46
- Re: Arguments regarding "complexity", Meng Weng Wong, 13:14
- Re: vernon schryver, Meng Weng Wong, 13:01
- Re: Arguments regarding "complexity", Philip Gladstone, 13:00
- Re: vernon schryver, Meng Weng Wong, 12:54
- Re: vernon schryver, wayne, 12:49
- Re: Arguments regarding "complexity", R. Scott Perry, 12:47
- Arguments regarding "complexity", Greg Connor, 12:20
- Re: DDoS attacks via SPF, wayne, 12:10
- Re: DDoS attacks via SPF, wayne, 11:54
- Re: DDoS attacks via SPF, wayne, 11:48
- Re: Fw: SPF support in 2.1 release?, Mark Lentczner, 09:37
- Bug warning in IP5 wizard, Wechsler, 09:36
- Re: DDoS attacks via SPF, Philip Gladstone, 07:29
- Re: SPF logging at the dns server, R. Scott Perry, 05:58
- And one more script:, Wechsler, 03:53
- Web interface to spfquery back up, Wechsler, 03:25
- Re: DDoS attacks via SPF, Wechsler, 02:59
- Re: about the SPF registry, Wechsler, 02:56
- Re: DDoS attacks via SPF, matthew-list, 02:28
- Re: DDoS attacks via SPF, matthew-list, 02:06
December 18, 2003
- Re: Starting spfd (FreeBSD), Mark Foster, 23:02
- Re: Starting spfd (FreeBSD), Brian Hatch, 22:25
- Re: vernon schryver, Thomas Harold, 20:41
- Re: DDoS attacks via SPF, Mark, 20:14
- Re: DDoS attacks via SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 20:06
- Re: DDoS attacks via SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 20:03
- Re: MS Exchange, Philip Gladstone, 19:41
- Re: DDoS attacks via SPF, Philip Gladstone, 18:20
- RE: about the SPF registry, Dustin Trammell, 17:36
- Re: Starting spfd (FreeBSD), Mark, 16:39
- Re: DDoS attacks via SPF, Greg Connor, 16:21
- Re: DDoS attacks via SPF, Terence Way, 16:15
- Re: DDoS attacks via SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 16:08
- Re: vernon schryver, Greg Connor, 15:57
- Re: DDoS attacks via SPF, matthew-list, 15:43
- vernon schryver, Meng Weng Wong, 15:21
- Re: DDoS attacks via SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 14:29
- Re: Hostname foo in Mail::SPF::Query, Meng Weng Wong, 14:24
- Re: Hostname foo in Mail::SPF::Query, John Capo, 14:21
- Re: proposed SPF support in Postfix 2.1 release, Bill Landry, 14:11
- proposed SPF support in Postfix 2.1 release, Meng Weng Wong, 14:08
- Re: DDoS attacks via SPF, Terence Way, 13:49
- Re: DDoS attacks via SPF, wayne, 13:41
- Re: DDoS attacks via SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 12:47
- Re: DDoS attacks via SPF, wayne, 12:45
- Re: Hostname foo in Mail::SPF::Query, Meng Weng Wong, 12:36
- Re: Hostname foo in Mail::SPF::Query, John Capo, 12:35
- Re: Starting spfd (FreeBSD), Jonathan Steinert, 12:31
- Re: Starting spfd (FreeBSD), Jonathan Steinert, 12:28
- Re: Hostname foo in Mail::SPF::Query, Justin Mason, 12:25
- Re: Hostname foo in Mail::SPF::Query, Meng Weng Wong, 12:20
- RE: Python implementation, Terence Way, 11:57
- Hostname foo in Mail::SPF::Query, John Capo, 11:31
- RE: Python implementation, Arik Baratz, 11:14
- RE: Python implementation, Terence Way, 10:53
- Re: DDoS attacks via SPF, Ask Bjørn Hansen, 10:52
- Re: DDoS attacks via SPF, Ask Bjørn Hansen, 10:52
- RE: Python implementation, Arik Baratz, 10:35
- Re: Starting spfd (FreeBSD), Hans Dieter Pearcey, 10:03
- Re: DDoS attacks via SPF, wayne, 10:02
- Re: Starting spfd (FreeBSD), Mark Foster, 10:01
- Re: Starting spfd (FreeBSD), Hans Dieter Pearcey, 09:56
- Python implementation, Terence Way, 09:47
- Re: Starting spfd (FreeBSD), Jonathan Steinert, 09:06
- Re: Starting spfd (FreeBSD), Jon Loeliger, 09:03
- Re: Starting spfd (FreeBSD), Odhiambo Washington, 08:51
- Re: Starting spfd (FreeBSD), Mark Foster, 08:32
- Re: DDoS attacks via SPF, Mark Foster, 08:29
- Re: DDoS attacks via SPF, Philipp Morger, 05:24
- Re: Fw: SPF support in 2.1 release?, Philipp Morger, 04:51
December 17, 2003
- Re: Starting spfd (FreeBSD), Hans Dieter Pearcey, 23:04
- RE: Maybe simple question, Greg Connor, 22:15
- RE: Maybe simple question, Vivien M., 20:40
- DDoS attacks via SPF, wayne, 18:47
- Fw: SPF support in 2.1 release?, Bill Landry, 18:25
- SPF in Postfix 2.1 ?, Meng Weng Wong, 17:51
- Re: SPF logging at the dns server, Bill Landry, 17:37
- Re: Starting spfd (FreeBSD), Mark Foster, 17:01
- Re: Starting spfd (FreeBSD), Meng Weng Wong, 16:53
- Re: Maybe simple question, Vivien M., 14:23
- Re: SPF logging at the dns server, Meng Weng Wong, 13:41
- Re: SPF logging at the dns server, Aredridel, 13:21
- Re: SPF logging at the dns server, wayne, 12:27
- Re: Current SPF accuracy figures from my mail spool, Justin Mason, 12:26
- Re: Current SPF accuracy figures from my mail spool, wayne, 12:10
- Re: Current SPF accuracy figures from my mail spool, Greg Connor, 11:52
- Re: SPF logging at the dns server, Greg Connor, 11:46
- Re: Current SPF accuracy figures from my mail spool, Justin Mason, 11:39
- RE: MS Exchange, Jon Bertrand, 11:23
- Re: Current SPF accuracy figures from my mail spool, Greg Connor, 11:21
- Re: Current SPF accuracy figures from my mail spool, Meng Weng Wong, 11:01
- Re: Starting spfd (FreeBSD), Mark Foster, 11:01
- if your posts to the list haven't been going through, Meng Weng Wong, 10:05
- RE: Maybe simple question, Arik Baratz, 05:22
- RE: Maybe simple question, Arik Baratz, 05:15
- RE: MS Exchange, Stuart Schneider, 03:03
- Re: MS Exchange, Odhiambo Washington, 02:52
- Re: Starting spfd (FreeBSD), Odhiambo Washington, 01:24
- followup on SPF mass-check, Justin Mason, 01:14
- Current SPF accuracy figures from my mail spool, Justin Mason, 00:59
- Re: about the SPF registry, Wechsler, 00:49
December 16, 2003
- Re: SPF is on slashdot again, wayne, 23:33
- RE: Maybe simple question, Greg Connor, 23:25
- RE: Maybe simple question, Vivien M., 19:59
- RE: Maybe simple question, Aredridel, 18:57
- Re: SPF-Help, wayne, 18:53
- Re: A heads-up on defaults, Mark Lentczner, 18:45
- MS Exchange, Marc Alaia, 18:30
- Re: about the SPF registry, Dan Boresjo, 18:28
- Re: SPF-Help, Meng Weng Wong, 18:25
- SPF-Help, Marc Alaia, 18:23
- Re: SPF-Announce, Meng Weng Wong, 18:17
- SPF-Announce, Marc Alaia, 18:16
- Re: best-guess first approximation to actual SPF records, Meng Weng Wong, 17:32
- Re: best-guess first approximation to actual SPF records, guillaume, 17:26
- Re: best-guess first approximation to actual SPF records, Meng Weng Wong, 17:06
- Re: about the SPF registry, Marc Hudson, 17:01
- Re: about the SPF registry, Jason, 16:53
- Re: about the SPF registry, Greg Connor, 16:24
- RE: Maybe simple question, Greg Connor, 16:21
- Re: about the SPF registry, Jesus Duarte, 16:10
- Re: Re: SMTP AUTH, guillaume, 16:05
- Re: SMTP AUTH, guillaume, 16:04
- Some comments on the draft, guillaume, 15:59
- Re: A heads-up on defaults, Wechsler, 15:55
- Re: Goal of SPF, guillaume, 15:54
- Re: about the SPF registry, Jason, 15:46
- Re: about the SPF registry, Wechsler, 15:42
- RE: about the SPF registry, Lee Carver (me), 15:23
- RE: about the SPF registry, Dustin Trammell, 15:22
- logos, Meng Weng Wong, 15:21
- Re: Maybe simple question, Alan Hodgson, 15:08
- RE: SPF on slashdot again; setup wizard available; logos available, Jon Bertrand, 15:08
- Re: A heads-up on defaults, Meng Weng Wong, 15:08
- Re: about the SPF registry, Wechsler, 15:07
- Re: A heads-up on defaults, Wechsler, 15:04
- RE: Maybe simple question, Vivien M., 14:59
- Re: about the SPF registry, Mark Lentczner, 14:52
- Re: A heads-up on defaults, Jasper Wallace, 14:36
- RE: Maybe simple question, Greg Connor, 14:34
- Re: Maybe simple question, wayne, 14:31
- Re: A heads-up on defaults, Mark Farver, 14:17
- Re: about the SPF registry, wayne, 13:58
- Domain churn, Meng Weng Wong, 13:57
- SPF on slashdot again; setup wizard available; logos available, Meng Weng Wong, 13:54
- RE: Maybe simple question, Vivien M., 13:52
- RE: Maybe simple question, Vivien M., 13:46
- about the SPF registry, Meng Weng Wong, 13:44
- RE: Maybe simple question, Vivien M., 13:38
- SPF is on slashdot again, wayne, 13:13
- Re: SPF logging at the dns server, guillaume, 13:07
- Re: A heads-up on defaults, R. Scott Perry, 12:47
- Re: A heads-up on defaults, Hans Dieter Pearcey, 12:38
- Re: A heads-up on defaults, Greg Connor, 12:37
- Re: SPF logging at the dns server, Greg Connor, 12:35
- Re: SPF logging at the dns server, wayne, 12:28
- Re: A heads-up on defaults, Mark Farver, 12:16
- Re: SPF logging at the dns server, Greg Connor, 12:13
- Re: SPF logging at the dns server, Greg Connor, 12:03
- Re: Starting spfd (FreeBSD), Jonathan Steinert, 11:53
- Re: Starting spfd (FreeBSD), Jonathan Steinert, 11:04
- Re: Starting spfd (FreeBSD), Hans Dieter Pearcey, 10:56
- Re: Starting spfd (FreeBSD), Mark Foster, 10:34
- RE: Maybe simple question, Arik Baratz, 09:50
- Re: Starting spfd (FreeBSD), Jasper Wallace, 09:49
- Re: A heads-up on defaults, Terence Way, 09:18
- Re: A heads-up on defaults, wayne, 09:11
- Re: Maybe simple question, Jon Loeliger, 09:00
- RE: Maybe simple question, Arik Baratz, 07:54
- Re: Getting SPF out there, David Saez, 07:38
- Starting spfd (FreeBSD), Odhiambo Washington, 07:38
- RE: Maybe simple question, Arik Baratz, 07:13
- Re: A heads-up on defaults, Brian Hatch, 03:34
- Re: Getting SPF out there, matthew-list, 03:07
- RE: Maybe simple question, Greg Connor, 01:19
December 15, 2003
- RE: Maybe simple question, Vivien M., 23:36
- Re: A Question about the pobox.com wizard, Brian Hatch, 23:26
- RE: Maybe simple question, Vivien M., 23:26
- Re: Getting SPF out there, Jon Loeliger, 22:17
- Goal of SPF, Edward Ned Harvey, 21:38
- Re: best-guess first approximation to actual SPF records, wayne, 20:33
- Re: Spam:When MX is not present, fall back to A, wayne, 20:26
- Re: Maybe simple question, Jon Loeliger, 20:18
- Re: Maybe simple question, wayne, 20:09
- Re: slogans, wayne, 19:07
- Re: A Question about the pobox.com wizard, Jasper Wallace, 19:05
- Re: SPF Logo and attribution, Meng Weng Wong, 18:58
- Re: Is it RFC yet?, wayne, 18:29
- Re: including records with 'all', Greg Connor, 17:00
- best-guess first approximation to actual SPF records, Meng Weng Wong, 16:38
- Re: Getting SPF out there, R. Scott Perry, 16:31
- why I decided to freeze the design with macros still in it, Meng Weng Wong, 16:19
- Getting SPF out there, Meng Weng Wong, 15:55
- Re: A heads-up on defaults, Meng Weng Wong, 14:51
- A heads-up on defaults, Wechsler, 14:48
- RE: Spam:When MX is not present, fall back to A, Dustin Trammell, 14:24
- RE: Is it RFC yet?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:18
- Re: Is it RFC yet?, R. Scott Perry, 13:20
- RE: Is it RFC yet?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:12
- including records with 'all', Wechsler, 12:58
- RE: Maybe simple question, Greg Connor, 12:51
- RE: Maybe simple question, B. Johannessen, 12:35
- Re: Is it RFC yet?, Wechsler, 12:07
- RE: Is it RFC yet?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:32
- Re: Maybe simple question, Wechsler, 09:46
- Re: Maybe simple question, Brian Hatch, 09:42
- RE: Maybe simple question, Arik Baratz, 09:38
- RE: Maybe simple question, Edward Ned Harvey, 09:34
- RE: Maybe simple question, Edward Ned Harvey, 09:30
- Re: Maybe simple question, Brian Hatch, 09:21
- Re: Maybe simple question, Wechsler, 09:17
- Re: Maybe simple question, Brian Hatch, 09:06
- RE: Maybe simple question, Edward Ned Harvey, 08:58
- RE: Maybe simple question, Edward Ned Harvey, 08:52
- RE: Maybe simple question, Arik Baratz, 05:19
- RE: Maybe simple question, Greg Connor, 03:26
- Re: Maybe simple question, Ask Bjørn Hansen, 03:00
- Re: Maybe simple question, Alan Hodgson, 00:44
- Re: Maybe simple question, Mark, 00:42
December 14, 2003
- Re: slogans, David Saez, 23:32
- slogans, Jeremy Doupe, 21:55
- RE: Maybe simple question, Vivien M., 21:34
- RE: Maybe simple question, Edward Ned Harvey, 20:57
- Re: Maybe simple question, marrandy, 19:50
- Re: why SPF recommends records for your MX servers also, marrandy, 19:48
- Re: Maybe simple question, marrandy, 19:45
- Re: Maybe simple question, marrandy, 19:43
- Re: Maybe simple question, marrandy, 19:40
- Re: Maybe simple question, marrandy, 19:39
- Re: Maybe simple question, marrandy, 19:29
- Re: Maybe simple question, marrandy, 19:00
- Re: Unsolicited bulk email discarded., Meng Weng Wong, 18:53
- Re: Unsolicited bulk email discarded., Philipp Morger, 17:42
- Re: When MX is not present, fall back to A, Greg Connor, 14:58
- Re: Maybe simple question, Alan Hodgson, 14:56
- Re: SPF RR type?, Alan Hodgson, 14:45
- Re: Maybe simple question, marrandy, 14:30
- Re: Maybe simple question, Greg Connor, 14:21
- Re: Maybe simple question, marrandy, 14:08
- Re: Maybe simple question, marrandy, 13:47
- Re: on CAs as reputation providers; an argument for metric-based reputation services, marrandy, 13:16
- Re: Fwd: Re: Maybe simple question, marrandy, 13:03
- Re: Maybe simple question, marrandy, 12:41
- Re: A Question about the pobox.com wizard, spf, 12:35
- Re: the wizard and hostnames, etc., spf, 12:28
- improving spf 'marketing', David Saez, 11:52
- RE: Maybe simple question, Aredridel, 11:47
- Re: When MX is not present, fall back to A, Aredridel, 11:32
- Unsolicited bulk email discarded., Root, 11:31
- Re: Maybe simple question, Mark, 11:30
- why SPF recommends records for your MX servers also, Meng Weng Wong, 11:06
- Re: PTR does validate A also, correct?, Tim Wilde, 11:03
- When MX is not present, fall back to A, Meng Weng Wong, 11:02
- Re: A Question about the pobox.com wizard, Kevin Reed, 11:00
- PTR does validate A also, correct?, Brian Hatch, 10:59
- Re: A Question about the pobox.com wizard, Brian Hatch, 10:56
- the wizard and hostnames, etc., Meng Weng Wong, 10:54
- A Question about the pobox.com wizard, Jon Loeliger, 10:27
- Re: Maybe simple question, Meng Weng Wong, 09:57
- Re: Use of deny matches and +all, Meng Weng Wong, 09:50
- RE: Maybe simple question, Edward Ned Harvey, 09:44
- Use of deny matches and +all, Philip Gladstone, 09:41
- Re: Maybe simple question, Wechsler, 09:30
- RE: Maybe simple question, Edward Ned Harvey, 08:37
- RE: Maybe simple question, Edward Ned Harvey, 08:36
- Re: Please try my simple wizard, Wechsler, 03:51
- Re: Maybe simple question, Ask Bjørn Hansen, 02:24
December 13, 2003
- SPF RR type?, Bob Miller, 23:35
- RE: Maybe simple question, Edward Ned Harvey, 22:10
- Re: Maybe simple question, Alan Hodgson, 19:55
- Re: Please try my simple wizard, Jon Loeliger, 19:30
- RE: Maybe simple question, Edward Ned Harvey, 19:21
- Re: Please try my simple wizard, Meng Weng Wong, 18:43
- Re: Please try my simple wizard, Mark, 16:54
- Re: Maybe simple question, Mark, 16:46
- RE: Please try my simple wizard, Nils Puhlmann, 15:54
- Re: on CAs as reputation providers; an argument for metric-based reputation services, Greg Connor, 14:26
- Re: Fwd: Re: Maybe simple question, Greg Connor, 14:09
- Re: Maybe simple question, Jon Loeliger, 12:30
- Re: Maybe simple question, Wechsler, 11:58
- Re: Please try my simple wizard, Meng Weng Wong, 11:51
- Re: Please try my simple wizard, Aredridel, 11:46
- Re: Is it RFC yet?, Jon Loeliger, 10:47
- Re: Maybe simple question, Meng Weng Wong, 10:42
- (unknown), marrandy, 09:45
- Re: Eric Allman comments on SPF, Terence Way, 09:33
- Fwd: Re: Maybe simple question, marrandy, 06:01
- Re: on CAs as reputation providers; an argument for metric-based reputation services, Dan Boresjo, 03:33
- exim4.spf.acl-2.03 permissions, Jon Loeliger, 00:39
December 12, 2003
- Is it RFC yet?, Greg Connor, 23:22
- Re: Maybe simple question, marrandy, 21:25
- Please try my simple wizard, Meng Weng Wong, 19:49
- RE: Maybe simple question, Edward Ned Harvey, 19:41
- Re: Please Publish SPF Records, guillaume, 17:43
- Re: Maybe simple question, Alan Hodgson, 14:56
- Re: Maybe simple question, Meng Weng Wong, 14:50
- Re: Maybe simple question, Ned Harvey, 14:29
- Re: on CAs as reputation providers; an argument for metric-based reputation services, marrandy, 12:32
- Re: on CAs as reputation providers; an argument for metric-based reputation services, marrandy, 12:29
- Re: on CAs as reputation providers; an argument for metric-based reputation services, Eric S. Raymond, 12:19
- Macro to get the domain of current-sender, Philip Gladstone, 11:58
- Re: Please Publish SPF Records, Meng Weng Wong, 11:56
- Re: on CAs as reputation providers; an argument for metric-based reputation services, Dan Boresjo, 11:53
- Re: Please Publish SPF Records, Jon Loeliger, 11:26
- Spam marketing and promotion .., Lee Carver (me), 10:41
- Re: SPF Logo and attribution, spf, 10:35
- Re: SPF Logo and attribution, Meng Weng Wong, 10:06
- RE: How to reach critical mass, Lee Carver (me), 09:40
- Re: Maybe simple question, Rob Kaper, 09:40
- Re: SPF Logo and attribution, David Saez, 09:31
- Re: How to reach critical mass, Mark Foster, 08:51
- Re: SPF logging at the dns server, Philip Gladstone, 08:23
- How to reach critical mass, Harry Palmer, 07:31
- SPF Logo and attribution, Wechsler, 07:13
- Re: Maybe simple question, Wechsler, 07:06
- RE: Maybe simple question, Edward Ned Harvey, 06:46
- RE: Maybe simple question, Edward Ned Harvey, 06:43
- Maybe simple question, Edward Ned Harvey, 06:40
- Re: Plugins for Postfix, Sendmail, and Exim, Ask Bjørn Hansen, 05:36
- Re: How to reach critical mass, Anthony Howe, 01:56
- Re: How to reach critical mass, spf, 00:01
December 11, 2003
- Re: How to reach critical mass, Kitt Diebold, 23:08
- Re: Maybe simple question, wayne, 19:39
- Plugins for Postfix, Sendmail, and Exim, Meng Weng Wong, 18:42
- How to reach critical mass, wayne, 18:33
- SPF logging at the dns server, Greg Connor, 17:55
- Maybe simple question, Ned Harvey, 17:26
- Re: Is there a test site, Bob Miller, 16:05
- Re: Publisher setup wizard: version ready for test, wayne, 15:39
- Next step - SMTP server changes, Jon Bertrand, 15:32
- PTR validation, Meng Weng Wong, 15:30
- SPF developers mailing list created, Meng Weng Wong, 15:16
- Re: Is there a test site, Wechsler, 15:10
- Publisher setup wizard: version ready for test, Wechsler, 15:07
- Re: Is there a test site, marrandy, 15:06
- Re: Is there a test site, Mark, 15:04
- Re: publisher setup wizard, Philipp Morger, 14:59
- Re: publisher setup wizard, Philipp Morger, 14:54
- Re: Is there a test site, Richard George, 14:50
- Re: on CAs as reputation providers; an argument for metric-based reputation services, Philipp Morger, 14:43
- Re: Is there a test site, Mark, 14:14
- Re: Is there a test site, Meng Weng Wong, 13:47
- Re: Is there a test site, Bob Miller, 13:40
- Re: Is there a test site, Meng Weng Wong, 12:52
- Re: Is there a test site, marrandy, 12:43
- Re: Is there a test site, marrandy, 12:40
- Re: Is there a test site, Meng Weng Wong, 12:38
- Re: Is there a test site, Rob Kaper, 12:35
- Re: Is there a test site, Tim Wilde, 12:33
- Re: Is there a test site, marrandy, 12:30
- Is there a test site, marrandy, 08:25
- Re: Anyone have any way to test my records?, Philip Gladstone, 07:29
- Re: publisher setup wizard, Richard George, 06:00
December 10, 2003
- Re: Anyone have any way to test my records?, Meng Weng Wong, 23:08
- RE: Anyone have any way to test my records?, Stuart Schneider, 22:53
- Re: Anyone have any way to test my records?, Philip Gladstone, 13:53
- Re: publisher setup wizard, Richard George, 13:46
- Re: An additonal macro character?, Justin Mason, 12:32
- Re: Anyone have any way to test my records?, Meng Weng Wong, 11:54
- Re: An additonal macro character?, Mark, 11:40
- Re: Anyone have any way to test my records?, Richard George, 11:30
- Anyone have any way to test my records?, Jason, 11:11
- Re: An additonal macro character?, Meng Weng Wong, 10:51
- Re: Finest Clueless Impression..., Richard George, 09:29
- Re: An additonal macro character?, Philip Gladstone, 08:09
- Re: An additonal macro character?, Mark, 07:48
- Re: An additonal macro character?, Mark, 07:32
- An additonal macro character?, Philip Gladstone, 07:03
- Re: Finest Clueless Impression..., Richard George, 06:55
- Re: Finest Clueless Impression..., Mark, 06:37
- Re: Finest Clueless Impression..., Richard George, 05:07
- Re: Finest Clueless Impression..., Mark, 04:16
- Finest Clueless Impression..., Richard George, 03:45
- publisher setup wizard, Meng Weng Wong, 01:57
- Re: python client implementation, Terence Way, 01:09
- python client implementation, Meng Weng Wong, 00:48
- Re: New SPF records added to my domain, Erik Corry, 00:45
December 09, 2003
- Re: Please Publish SPF Records, Terence Way, 23:50
- Re: New SPF records added to my domain, Jasper Wallace, 22:42
- RE: New SPF records added to my domain, Ken, 21:17
- Re: New SPF records added to my domain, Meng Weng Wong, 20:54
- Re: New SPF records added to my domain, Jasper Wallace, 19:09
- New SPF records added to my domain, spf-discuss, 18:52
- Please Publish SPF Records, Meng Weng Wong, 15:17
- Status Report on the SPF draft, Meng Weng Wong, 15:08
- Re: on CAs as reputation providers; an argument for metric-based reputation services, Dan Boresjo, 14:55
- Re: on CAs as reputation providers; an argument for metric-based reputation services, Philipp Morger, 12:14
- Re: patents, trusting CAs, etc., Philipp Morger, 11:51
December 08, 2003
- Re: on CAs as reputation providers; an argument for metric-based reputation services, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 20:22
- Re: on CAs as reputation providers; an argument for metric-based reputation services, Dan Boresjo, 18:56
- Re: on CAs as reputation providers; an argument for metric-based reputation services, Meng Weng Wong, 17:17
- Re: on CAs as reputation providers; an argument for metric-based reputation services, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:41
- RE: patents, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:06
- RE: on CAs as reputation providers; an argument for metric-based reputation services, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:06
- Re: [registrars] yahoo announces new anti-spam meas ure (fwd), Dan Boresjo, 13:22
- Re: [registrars] yahoo announces new anti-spam m easure (fwd), Benjamin Franz, 12:55
- Re: patents, trusting CAs, etc., Terence Way, 12:22
- Re: [registrars] yahoo announces new anti-spam measure (fwd), Jonathan Steinert, 12:21
- Re: patents, B. Johannessen, 12:10
- Re: on CAs as reputation providers; an argument for metric-based reputation services, Meng Weng Wong, 12:08
- some thoughts on the business model for reputation services, Meng Weng Wong, 12:00
- Re: [registrars] yahoo announces new anti-spam meas ure (fwd), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:50
- Re: [registrars] yahoo announces new anti-spam m easure (fwd), Aredridel, 11:47
- Re: [registrars] yahoo announces new anti-spam m easure (fwd), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:38
- patents, Meng Weng Wong, 11:36
- on CAs as reputation providers; an argument for metric-based reputation services, Meng Weng Wong, 11:36
- Re: [registrars] yahoo announces new anti-spam meas ure (fwd), Justin Mason, 11:18
- Re: [registrars] yahoo announces new anti-spam measure (fwd), Benjamin Franz, 09:57
- Re: [registrars] yahoo announces new anti-spam measure (fwd), Dan Boresjo, 08:33
- Re: theinquirer on spf / domainkeys, Meng Weng Wong, 08:27
- theinquirer on spf / domainkeys, Meng Weng Wong, 08:21
- Re: [registrars] yahoo announces new anti-spam measure (fwd), Mark, 07:12
- Re: [registrars] yahoo announces new anti-spam meas ure (fwd), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 06:21
- RE: [registrars] yahoo announces new anti-spam meas ure (fwd), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 06:15
- Re: [registrars] yahoo announces new anti-spam measure (fwd), David Saez, 01:59
- Re: [registrars] yahoo announces new anti-spam measure (fwd), Bill Rockefeller, 01:25
- Re: [registrars] yahoo announces new anti-spam measure (fwd), Philipp Morger, 01:18
December 07, 2003
- RE: [registrars] yahoo announces new anti-spam meas ure (fwd), Marc Alaia, 14:33
- Re: [registrars] yahoo announces new anti-spam measure (fwd), Erik Corry, 13:58
- Re: [registrars] yahoo announces new anti-spam measure (fwd), Mark, 13:54
- Re: [registrars] yahoo announces new anti-spam measure (fwd), Meng Weng Wong, 13:49
- Re: IPv6 slashes, Jasper Wallace, 13:32
- Re: [registrars] yahoo announces new anti-spam measure (fwd), Erik Corry, 13:29
- [registrars] yahoo announces new anti-spam measure (fwd), Mark Jeftovic, 12:08
- Re: IPv6 slashes, Aredridel, 12:05
- Re: IPv6 slashes, Philipp Morger, 11:56
December 04, 2003
- "a,mx,ptr", Meng Weng Wong, 15:54
- spfenabled(_at_)pobox(_dot_)com, Meng Weng Wong, 14:22
- other mechanisms, Meng Weng Wong, 14:05
- Re: Eric Allman comments on SPF, Justin Mason, 13:47
- Re: New spfd based Exim ACL, Meng Weng Wong, 13:29
- RE: Eric Allman comments on SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:04
- New spfd based Exim ACL, David Saez, 10:56
- RE: Eric Allman comments on SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:45
- Re: Eric Allman comments on SPF, Bob Miller, 09:19
- RE: Eric Allman comments on SPF, Aredridel, 09:12
- RE: Eric Allman comments on SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:06
- RE: Eric Allman comments on SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:34
- RE: Eric Allman comments on SPF, Marc Alaia, 08:06
- RE: Eric Allman comments on SPF, Marc Alaia, 08:04
- RE: Thoughts on complexity and constituencies, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:44
- RE: Eric Allman comments on SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:39
- Thoughts on complexity and constituencies, Philip Gladstone, 07:38
- draft 02.9 comments, Anthony Howe, 06:24
- Re: Eric Allman comments on SPF, Mark, 03:26
- Re: Eric Allman comments on SPF, Dan Boresjo, 03:08
- Re: Eric Allman comments on SPF, Mark, 02:52
- Re: Eric Allman comments on SPF, B. Johannessen, 02:25
- Re: Eric Allman comments on SPF, Graham Murray, 00:02
December 03, 2003
- A Pareto-Efficiency Argument for A Richer Syntax, Meng Weng Wong, 21:08
- RE: Eric Allman comments on SPF, Marc Alaia, 20:40
- Re: Eric Allman comments on SPF, Eric S. Raymond, 19:26
- RE: Eric Allman comments on SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:15
- Re: Eric Allman comments on SPF, Mark, 18:07
- Eric Allman comments on SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 17:36
December 01, 2003
- Re: SHOULD (NOT) SPF-compliants MTAs send bounces?, Rob Kaper, 19:48
- Re: SHOULD (NOT) SPF-compliants MTAs send bounces?, Sam Horrocks, 17:58
- Re: SHOULD (NOT) SPF-compliants MTAs send bounces?, Meng Weng Wong, 15:14
- reference milter wanted, Meng Weng Wong, 15:13
- Re: SHOULD (NOT) SPF-compliants MTAs send bounces?, Mark, 10:32
- Re: SHOULD (NOT) SPF-compliants MTAs send bounces?, Philipp Morger, 10:23
- Re: SHOULD (NOT) SPF-compliants MTAs send bounces?, Dan Boresjo, 08:36