Don't recall if this has been covered before, but I'm wondering if, in light
of the recently discussed intentions in pursuing official RFC status, should
the Received-SPF: header recommendation be X-Received-SPF: instead?
(ref: http://spf.pobox.com/newheader.html)
Also, when will the most recent spfd be available on CPAN in Mail::SPF::Query?
I mean the one with setuser, pathuser and those options.
Thanks.
--
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints...
Mark Foster <mark(_at_)foster(_dot_)cc> http://mark.foster.cc/
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡