On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 23:05, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
Yes, it is excellent feedback. Reinforces what some of us have been
telling you for months; SPF needs its own record type.
And an order of magnitude reduction in complexity...
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 10:06:37PM -0500, Steve Bellovin wrote:
The macro language scares me -- it's very complex.
Bob
--
-=[ B. Johannessen | bob(_at_)db(_dot_)org -=- http://db.org/ | +4797152009 ]=-
-=[ Mail & Spam - News, Drafts & Standards - http://db.org/blog/ ]=-
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡