-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Meng Weng Wong writes:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 02:39:59PM -0600, Roger wrote:
|
| From what I understand putting ?all is really wish-washy. It says that
| sending from this ip is unknown. Depending on the behavior of your spam
| filter or MTA this option won't carry much weight from what I see.
I'm guessing SpamAssassin will distinguish between
- fail
- unknown (record exists)
- unknown (record does not exist)
and score the first very negatively and the second slightly negatively.
Yep, hopefully.
BTW does Mail::SPF::Query support a way to differentiate between the
second and third return types?
- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS
iD8DBQFABHjbQTcbUG5Y7woRAouLAJsHO5CHS3w5eqQRP98onv3f7Gf+QACgjEsM
YRbn4VZFkuaz4NCBW5vCk0s=
=hHdm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡