On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 10:39:00PM +0100, Ramakanta (das) HKS (PAMHO.NET SysOp)
(Zurich - CH) wrote:
| In spf-draft-20040209.txt in the section 5.2 it says:
|
| Note: during recursion into an Include mechanism, explanations do not
| propagate out.
|
| What does this exactly mean? Should 'exp' directives in included SPF records
| be ignored?
|
| Supposing following SPF records
|
| xyz.com. TXT "v=spf1 include:inc.xyz.com exp=exp1.xyz.com -all"
| inc.xyz.com TXT "v=spf1 a exp=exp2.xyz.com -all"
|
| if the 'a' mechanism does not match, which one of the two explanations
| should be taken?
|
yes, "exp" directives in included SPF records should be ignored.
The first explanation should be used.
Is there a better way to phrase it?