From: Carl Hutzler
Sent: June 23, 2004 7:49 AM
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Indiustry Alliance Publish Anti-Spam
Proposals
Carl,
I greatly appreciate the clarification. It is
important.
Please understand I am not wanting to make life
difficult.
The reason I raised the various scenarios is to
point out some potential pitfalls. Being
forewarned is forearmed.
Again, thank you for taking the time to deal with
this issue.
Kind regards,
John
John Glube
Toronto, Canada
The FTC Calls For Sender Authentication
http://www.learnsteps4profit.com/dne.html
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com] On Behalf Of Carl
Hutzler
Sent: June 23, 2004 7:49 AM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Indiustry Alliance Publish Anti-Spam
Proposals
Simply put, if a legitimate bulk mailer is sending UCE and we get
feedback on that from our members, we block them.
No court case.
No hassel.
On the other hand, if the same party is sending UCE and our
members love it for some reason, we don't block them. (Perhaps
the UCE is handing out $20 gift certs)
Its not my opinion that matters really. The ASTA just stayed away
from that debate. Not because we don't have an opinion but
because it was not our focus.
-Carl
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.708 / Virus Database: 464 - Release Date: 18/06/2004