SPF Discuss (thread)
Using "v=spf1/scope1,scope2,scope3 " as a scoping syntax,
Mark Shewmaker,
2004/10/30
- RE: Using "v=spf1/scope1,scope2,scope3 " as a scoping syntax, guy, 2004/10/30
- RE: Using "v=spf1/scope1,scope2,scope3 " as a scoping syntax, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/10/30
- Re: Using "v=spf1/scope1,scope2,scope3 " as a scoping syntax, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/30
- Re: Re: Using "v=spf1/scope1,scope2,scope3 " as a scoping syntax, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/30
- Re: Using "v=spf1/scope1,scope2,scope3 " as a scoping syntax, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/30
- Re: Using "v=spf1/scope1,scope2,scope3 " as a scoping syntax, Greg Connor, 2004/10/31
Agenda for FTC/NIST Email Authentication Summit,
Michael Hammer,
2004/10/29
- Re: Agenda for FTC/NIST Email Authentication Summit, wayne, 2004/10/29
- RE: Agenda for FTC/NIST Email Authentication Summit, guy, 2004/10/29
- RE: Agenda for FTC/NIST Email Authentication Summit, Brian Barrios, 2004/10/29
- Re: Agenda for FTC/NIST Email Authentication Summit, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/29
- Re: Re: Agenda for FTC/NIST Email Authentication Summit, wayne, 2004/10/29
- Re: Agenda for FTC/NIST Email Authentication Summit, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/29
- Re: Agenda for FTC/NIST Email Authentication Summit, wayne, 2004/10/29
- RE: Agenda for FTC/NIST Email Authentication Summit, John Glube, 2004/10/29
- Re: Agenda for FTC/NIST Email Authentication Summit, Michael Hammer, 2004/10/29
Unity, organisation and information for the masses,
Koen Martens,
2004/10/27
- Re: Unity, organisation and information for the masses, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/27
- Re: Unity, organisation and information for the masses, James Couzens, 2004/10/27
- RE: Unity, organisation and information for themasses, guy, 2004/10/27
- RE: Unity, organisation and information for themasses, James Couzens, 2004/10/28
- RE: Unity, organisation and information for themasses, Guy, 2004/10/28
- RE: Unity, organisation and information for themasses, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/28
- RE: Unity, organisation and information for themasses, James Couzens, 2004/10/28
- RE: Unity, organisation and information for themasses, James Couzens, 2004/10/28
- Re: Unity, organisation and information for themasses, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/29
- Re: Unity, organisation and information for the masses, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/10/28
Summary Please - where is SPF 1?,
Jon Bertrand,
2004/10/27
- Re: Summary Please - where is SPF 1?, Koen Martens, 2004/10/27
- Re: Summary Please - where is SPF 1?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/27
- Re: Summary Please - where is SPF 1?, James Couzens, 2004/10/27
- Re: Summary Please - where is SPF 1?, Graham Murray, 2004/10/28
- Re: Summary Please - where is SPF 1?, Hector Santos, 2004/10/28
- Re: Summary Please - where is SPF 1?, Michael Hammer, 2004/10/28
- Re: Summary Please - where is SPF 1?, Jeff Macdonald, 2004/10/28
- Re: Summary Please - where is SPF 1?, Michael Hammer, 2004/10/28
- Re: Summary Please - where is SPF 1?, Hector Santos, 2004/10/29
- Re: Summary Please - where is SPF 1?, Roy Badami, 2004/10/28
- Re: Summary Please - where is SPF 1?, Rand Wacker, 2004/10/28
- Re: Summary Please - where is SPF 1?, jpinkerton, 2004/10/28
- Re: Summary Please - where is SPF 1?, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/29
- RE: Summary Please - where is SPF 1?, Robert Barclay, 2004/10/28
- Re: Summary Please - where is SPF 1?, Michael Hammer, 2004/10/29
- Re: Summary Please - where is SPF 1?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/29
- RE: Summary Please - where is SPF 1?, Julian Mehnle, 2004/10/29
- Re: Summary Please - where is SPF 1?, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/29
- RE: Summary Please - where is SPF 1?, Julian Mehnle, 2004/10/29
- spf2.0/pra next to v=spf1, Andy Bakun, 2004/10/29
- RE: spf2.0/pra next to v=spf1, Julian Mehnle, 2004/10/29
- Re: RE: spf2.0/pra next to v=spf1, Andy Bakun, 2004/10/29
- Re: Summary Please - where is SPF 1?, Michael Hammer, 2004/10/29
- purely dual-format approach, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/29
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/29
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/31
- Re: purely dual-format approach, wayne, 2004/10/31
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Chris Haynes, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, jpinkerton, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Chris Haynes, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Chris Haynes, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, jpinkerton, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, jpinkerton, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Paul Iadonisi, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Roger Moser, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Chris Haynes, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/30
- Re: Re: purely dual-format approach, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/30
- Re: Re: purely dual-format approach, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/30
- Re: Re: purely dual-format approach, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/30
- RE: Re: purely dual-format approach, guy, 2004/10/30
- RE: Re: purely dual-format approach, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Roger Moser, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Roger Moser, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Roger Moser, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/30
- Re: Re: purely dual-format approach, wayne, 2004/10/30
- Re: Re: purely dual-format approach, wayne, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/30
- Re: Re: purely dual-format approach, wayne, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/30
- Re: Re: purely dual-format approach, Andy Bakun, 2004/10/30
- Re: Re: purely dual-format approach, jpinkerton, 2004/10/31
- RE: Re: purely dual-format approach, guy, 2004/10/31
- Re: Re: purely dual-format approach, jpinkerton, 2004/10/31
- Re: Re: purely dual-format approach, James Couzens, 2004/10/31
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Roger Moser, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Michael Hammer, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Andy Bakun, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Chris Haynes, 2004/10/31
- Re: purely dual-format approach, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, wayne, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, wayne, 2004/10/30
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Greg Connor, 2004/10/31
- RE: Summary Please - where is SPF 1?, Richard Bang, 2004/10/30
Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative,
Frank Hellmann,
2004/10/26
- Re: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, wayne, 2004/10/26
- Re: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/26
- Re: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, wayne, 2004/10/26
- Re: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, wayne, 2004/10/26
- Re: [comment] Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Shane Rush, 2004/10/26
- Re: [comment] Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Koen Martens, 2004/10/27
- Re: [comment] Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, NSLM, 2004/10/27
- Re: [comment] Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, jpinkerton, 2004/10/27
- Re: [comment] Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/27
- Carrying on with the SPF project, this time with a clear charter, Julian Mehnle, 2004/10/27
- Re: Carrying on with the SPF project, this time with a clear charter, Lloyd Zusman, 2004/10/27
- Re: Carrying on with the SPF project, this time with a clear charter, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/27
- Re: [comment] Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Douglas K. Fischer, 2004/10/28
- Re: [comment] Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Joe Thompson, 2004/10/27
- Re: [comment] Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, John Birrell, 2004/10/27
- (off-list) RE: [comment] Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/27
- Re: (off-list) RE: [comment] Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Koen Martens, 2004/10/27
- Re: [comment] Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Shane Rush, 2004/10/27
- Re: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Hector Santos, 2004/10/26
- RE: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Julian Mehnle, 2004/10/26
- Re: RE: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Shane Rush, 2004/10/26
- RE: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Julian Mehnle, 2004/10/26
- Re: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/27
I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?,
Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com>,
2004/10/26
- Re: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/26
- Re: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Andrew W . Donoho, 2004/10/27
- Re: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Andrew W . Donoho, 2004/10/27
- RE: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, guy, 2004/10/27
- Re: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/27
- RE: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Scott Kitterman, 2004/10/31
- RE: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/27
- Re: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Andrew W . Donoho, 2004/10/28
- Re: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Greg Connor, 2004/10/28
- RE: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Julian Mehnle, 2004/10/28
- Re: RE: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Greg Connor, 2004/10/28
- RE: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, guy, 2004/10/28
- RE: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Greg Connor, 2004/10/28
- RE: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Guy, 2004/10/29
- Re: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Graham Murray, 2004/10/27
- RE: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Scott Kitterman, 2004/10/31
- I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Holm, Mark, 2004/10/27
Sender ID in the news,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/10/25
- Re: Sender ID in the news, wayne, 2004/10/25
- Re: Sender ID in the news, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/25
- Re: Sender ID in the news, Hector Santos, 2004/10/25
- Re: Sender ID in the news, wayne, 2004/10/25
- Re: Sender ID in the news, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/25
- Re: Sender ID in the news, wayne, 2004/10/25
- Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/26
- Roger Moser, Mike, 2004/10/26
- RE: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Julian Mehnle, 2004/10/26
- Re: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Shane Rush, 2004/10/26
- RE: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Scott Kitterman, 2004/10/26
- Discuss vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Scott Kitterman, 2004/10/26
- Re: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/10/26
- Re: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, James Couzens, 2004/10/26
- Re: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/10/26
- Re: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Hector Santos, 2004/10/26
- Re: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, James Couzens, 2004/10/27
- RE: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Julian Mehnle, 2004/10/26
- Re: RE: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/26
- Re: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, James Couzens, 2004/10/27
- Re: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, wayne, 2004/10/26
- Re: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, spf, 2004/10/26
- RE: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Ian Peter, 2004/10/26
- Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Roy Badami, 2004/10/26
- Re: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, wayne, 2004/10/26
- Re: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Paul Iadonisi, 2004/10/26
- Re: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Greg Connor, 2004/10/26
- RE: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/27
- Re: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, jpinkerton, 2004/10/27
- Re: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Shane Rush, 2004/10/27
- RE: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Julian Mehnle, 2004/10/27
- Re: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/27
- Re: Vote of confidence/no-confidence in Meng as SPF representative, Lou Katz, 2004/10/27
- Re: Sender ID in the news, Koen Martens, 2004/10/26
- Re: Sender ID in the news, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/25
- Re: Sender ID in the news, Koen Martens, 2004/10/26
- RE: Sender ID in the news, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/26
- Re: Sender ID in the news, Carl Hutzler, 2004/10/26
- Re: Sender ID in the news, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/26
- Re: Sender ID in the news, wayne, 2004/10/26
- RE: Sender ID in the news, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/26
- Re: Sender ID in the news, wayne, 2004/10/26
- Re: Sender ID in the news, Alan Hodgson, 2004/10/26
- Re: Sender ID in the news, Roger Moser, 2004/10/26
- Re: Sender ID in the news, Mark, 2004/10/26
- RE: Sender ID in the news, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/26
- Re: Sender ID in the news, David, 2004/10/28
- RE: Sender ID in the news, Richard Bang, 2004/10/28
- Re: Sender ID in the news, David, 2004/10/28
- SES (was Re: Sender ID in the news), James Couzens, 2004/10/28
- Re: SES, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/29
- Re: Re: SES, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/10/29
- Re: SES, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/29
- Moved to SES-DEVEL list (was Re: SES), James Couzens, 2004/10/29
- Re: Moved to SES-DEVEL list, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/29
- RE: Re: Moved to SES-DEVEL list, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/31
- Re: Moved to SES-DEVEL list (was Re: SES), jpinkerton, 2004/10/29
- Re: Moved to SES-DEVEL list (was Re: SES), jpinkerton, 2004/10/29
- Re: Moved to SES-DEVEL list (was Re: SES), Mark, 2004/10/29
- Re: Moved to SES-DEVEL list (was Re: SES), James Couzens, 2004/10/29
- Re: Sender ID in the news, Hannah Schroeter, 2004/10/27
- Re: Sender ID in the news, jpinkerton, 2004/10/27
- Re: Sender ID in the news, Hannah Schroeter, 2004/10/27
- Re: Sender ID in the news, jpinkerton, 2004/10/27
- Re: Sender ID in the news, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/10/27
- Re: Sender ID in the news, Hannah Schroeter, 2004/10/27
- Sender ID in the news, Roger Moser, 2004/10/26
- Re: Sender ID in the news, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/10/26
- Re: Sender ID in the news, wayne, 2004/10/26
- Re: Sender ID in the news, James Couzens, 2004/10/27
- Re: Sender ID in the news, Chris Haynes, 2004/10/27
- RE: Sender ID in the news, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/27
- Re: Sender ID in the news, Chris Haynes, 2004/10/27
- RE: Sender ID in the news, guy, 2004/10/27
- Re: Sender ID in the news, Chris Haynes, 2004/10/27
- RE: Sender ID in the news, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/27
- RE: Sender ID in the news, guy, 2004/10/27
- RE: Sender ID in the news, Julian Mehnle, 2004/10/27
- RE: RE: Sender ID in the news, Scott Kitterman, 2004/10/27
- RE: RE: Sender ID in the news, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/27
- RE: RE: Sender ID in the news, Scott Kitterman, 2004/10/27
- RE: RE: Sender ID in the news, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/27
- RE: RE: Sender ID in the news, Greg Connor, 2004/10/27
- RE: RE: Sender ID in the news, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/28
- RE: RE: Sender ID in the news, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/28
- Re: Sender ID in the news, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/30
- RE: Sender ID in the news, Julian Mehnle, 2004/10/28
- Re: Sender ID in the news, administrator, 2004/10/26
Has this been considered,
Richard Bang,
2004/10/22
- Re: Has this been considered, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/22
- Re: Has this been considered, Jeff Macdonald, 2004/10/22
- Re: Has this been considered, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/22
- Re: Has this been considered, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/10/22
- DK, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/25
- Re: DK, Jeff Macdonald, 2004/10/25
- Re: DK, wayne, 2004/10/25
- RE: DK, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/25
- RE: DK, Jeff Macdonald, 2004/10/26
- Re: Has this been considered, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/22
- Re: Has this been considered, Holm, Mark, 2004/10/22
SPF authenticates, it does not identify spam,
Stephane Bortzmeyer,
2004/10/21
- Re: SPF authenticates, it does not identify spam, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/10/21
- RE: SPF authenticates, it does not identify spam, Richard Bang, 2004/10/22
- Re: SPF authenticates, it does not identify spam, Holm, Mark, 2004/10/22
New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF,
william(at)elan.net,
2004/10/19
- Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Tony Finch, 2004/10/19
- Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/19
- RE: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/20
- Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/21
- RE: Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/21
- Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/21
- RE: Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/22
- RE: Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/10/22
- Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/22
- Re: Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Chris Haynes, 2004/10/23
- RE: Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/23
- Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/27
- RE: Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/23
- RE: Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Greg Connor, 2004/10/23
- RE: Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/10/24
- RE: Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Greg Connor, 2004/10/24
- RE: Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Scott Kitterman, 2004/10/25
- RE: Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Greg Connor, 2004/10/25
- RE: Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/25
- Re: Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Chris Haynes, 2004/10/26
- Re: Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/26
- RE: Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Scott Kitterman, 2004/10/26
- RE: Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/26
- Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/27
- RE: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/23
- RE: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/23
- Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Chris Haynes, 2004/10/24
- Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/19
- Re: Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/10/19
- Re: Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/19
- Re: Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Jeff Macdonald, 2004/10/20
- Re: Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/22
- Re: Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/22
- RE: Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/22
- Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/19
- Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF, Greg Connor, 2004/10/22
When did we lose control?,
Mark,
2004/10/16
- Re: When did we lose control?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/10/17
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, jpinkerton, 2004/10/17
- Re: When did we lose control?, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/17
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, wayne, 2004/10/17
- Re: When did we lose control?, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/17
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, Mark Lentczner, 2004/10/17
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, wayne, 2004/10/17
- RE: Re: When did we lose control?, guy, 2004/10/17
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, jpinkerton, 2004/10/18
- Requested changes (was: When did we lose control?), Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/18
- Re: Requested changes, wayne, 2004/10/18
- Re: Requested changes, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/18
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, Alan Madill, 2004/10/17
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, phil, 2004/10/18
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, wayne, 2004/10/17
- Re: When did we lose control?, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/18
- Re: When did we lose control?, Roger Moser, 2004/10/18
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, wayne, 2004/10/18
- RE: Re: When did we lose control?, guy, 2004/10/18
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, jpinkerton, 2004/10/18
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, wayne, 2004/10/18
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/18
- Re: When did we lose control?, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/18
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, wayne, 2004/10/20
- Re: When did we lose control?, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/21
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, wayne, 2004/10/21
- Re: When did we lose control?, Roger Moser, 2004/10/21
- Re: When did we lose control?, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/21
- Re: When did we lose control?, Roger Moser, 2004/10/21
- Re: When did we lose control?, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/21
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, jpinkerton, 2004/10/17
- Re: When did we lose control?, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/18
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/10/18
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/18
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, Lou Katz, 2004/10/18
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, jpinkerton, 2004/10/19
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, Philip Waters, 2004/10/19
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, David Brodbeck, 2004/10/19
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, Philip Waters, 2004/10/19
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/10/19
- RE: Re: When did we lose control?, guy, 2004/10/19
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, Boyd Lynn Gerber, 2004/10/19
- Re: *****SPAM***** Re: Re: When did we lose control?, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/10/19
- Re: *****SPAM***** Re: Re: When did we lose control?, Boyd Lynn Gerber, 2004/10/19
- Re: There is no cabal (was: When did we lose control?), spf, 2004/10/19
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, Michael Hammer, 2004/10/19
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, wayne, 2004/10/18
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, wayne, 2004/10/17
- Re: When did we lose control?, Greg Connor, 2004/10/17
- RE: Re: When did we lose control?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/10/18
- RE: Re: When did we lose control?, terry, 2004/10/19
- RE: Re: When did we lose control?, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/20
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, Lou Katz, 2004/10/20
- RE: Re: When did we lose control?, James Couzens, 2004/10/20
- RE: Re: When did we lose control?, Dan Barker, 2004/10/21
- RE: Re: When did we lose control?, James Couzens, 2004/10/21
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, Mark, 2004/10/21
- RE: Re: When did we lose control?, guy, 2004/10/21
- RE: Re: When did we lose control?, John Glube, 2004/10/21
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, wayne, 2004/10/21
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, James Couzens, 2004/10/21
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, Michael Hammer, 2004/10/21
- RE: Re: When did we lose control?, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/21
- RE: Re: When did we lose control?, David Brodbeck, 2004/10/21
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/10/21
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, James Couzens, 2004/10/21
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, Roger B.A. Klorese, 2004/10/21
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, James Couzens, 2004/10/21
- Regain control - *was* - When did we lose control?, jpinkerton, 2004/10/21
- Re: Regain control - *was* - When did we lose control?, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/10/21
- Re: Regain control - *was* - When did we lose control?, jpinkerton, 2004/10/21
- Re: Regain control - *was* - When did we lose control?, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/10/22
- RE: Regain control - *was* - When did we lose control?, guy, 2004/10/21
- RE: Regain control - *was* - When did we lose control?, terry, 2004/10/21
- Re: Regain control, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/21
- Re: Regain control - *was* - When did we lose control?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/10/21
- Re: Regain control - *was* - When did we lose control?, James Couzens, 2004/10/21
- Re: Regain control - *was* - When did we losecontrol?, jpinkerton, 2004/10/22
- SPF Organization - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/22
- Re: SPF Organization - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community, jamesp, 2004/10/22
- Re: SPF Organization - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community, Chris Drake, 2004/10/24
- RE: SPF Organization - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community, Richard Bang, 2004/10/24
- RE: SPF Organization - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/24
- Re: SPF Organization - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community, Hector Santos, 2004/10/24
- Re: SPF Organization - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community, wayne, 2004/10/22
- Re: SPF Organization - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community, Commerco WebMaster, 2004/10/22
- Re: SPF Organization - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community, jpinkerton, 2004/10/22
- Re: SPF Organization - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/22
- RE: SPF Organization - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/22
- Re: SPF Organization - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community, Koen Martens, 2004/10/23
- Re: SPF Organization - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community, Chris Haynes, 2004/10/23
- RE: SPF Organization - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community, John Glube, 2004/10/23
- Re: SPF Organization - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community, Marc Kool, 2004/10/24
- Re: SPF Organization - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/10/23
- Re: SPF Organization - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community, Tim Meadowcroft, 2004/10/24
- Re: SPF Organization - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community, Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/10/24
- Re: SPF Organization - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on futureof SPF Community, Mark, 2004/10/24
- Re: SPF Organization - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community, Gerhard W. Recher, 2004/10/24
- Re: SPF Organization - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/10/24
- Re: SPF Organization - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community, Boyd Lynn Gerber, 2004/10/25
- Re: SPF Organization - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community, James Couzens, 2004/10/25
- Re: SPF Organization - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community, Michael Hammer, 2004/10/25
- RE: SPF Organization - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community, Scott Kitterman, 2004/10/25
- Re: SPF Organization - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community, Arik Baratz, 2004/10/25
- Re: SPF Organization - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community, Michael Weiner, 2004/10/26
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, David Brodbeck, 2004/10/21
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, James Couzens, 2004/10/21
- Re: When did we lose control?, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/21
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, Graham Murray, 2004/10/24
- RE: Re: When did we lose control?, Vivien M., 2004/10/21
- RE: Re: When did we lose control?, James Couzens, 2004/10/21
- RE: Re: When did we lose control?, Vivien M., 2004/10/21
- RE: Re: When did we lose control?, John Glube, 2004/10/22
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/22
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, wayne, 2004/10/22
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/22
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, wayne, 2004/10/22
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, Alan Hodgson, 2004/10/22
- RE: Re: When did we lose control?, John Glube, 2004/10/22
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, jpinkerton, 2004/10/22
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, jpinkerton, 2004/10/22
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, John Hinton, 2004/10/22
- Re: When did we lose control?, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/21
- RE: Re: When did we lose control?, John Glube, 2004/10/21
- Re: When did we lose control?, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/22
- SPF-classic is spf-draft-200406., wayne, 2004/10/21
- RE: SPF-classic is spf-draft-200406., guy, 2004/10/21
- Re: Re: When did we lose control?, Greg Connor, 2004/10/21
- RE: Re: When did we lose control?, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/22
- the Seth Hypothetical, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/22
- Re: the Seth Hypothetical, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/22
- Re: the Seth Hypothetical, Jeff Macdonald, 2004/10/22
- Re: the Seth Hypothetical, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/22
- Re: the Seth Hypothetical, Commerco WebMaster, 2004/10/22
- RE: the Seth Hypothetical, guy, 2004/10/22
- Re: the Seth Hypothetical, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/22
- Re: the Seth Hypothetical, Commerco WebMaster, 2004/10/22
- Re: the Seth Hypothetical, Michael Hammer, 2004/10/25
- Re: the Seth Hypothetical, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/25
- Re: the Seth Hypothetical, Michael Hammer, 2004/10/25
- Re: the Seth Hypothetical, Greg Connor, 2004/10/25
- Re: the Seth Hypothetical, Michael Hammer, 2004/10/25
- RE: the Seth Hypothetical, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/25
- RE: the Seth Hypothetical, Greg Connor, 2004/10/25
- Re: the Seth Hypothetical, jpinkerton, 2004/10/26
- Re: new Sender-ID Draft (was the Seth Hypothetical), James Couzens, 2004/10/26
- Re: the Seth Hypothetical, wayne, 2004/10/22
- Re: the Seth Hypothetical, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/25
- RE: the Seth Hypothetical, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/25
- RE: the Seth Hypothetical, Ian Peter, 2004/10/25
- Re: the Seth Hypothetical, Koen Martens, 2004/10/26
- Re: the Seth Hypothetical, jpinkerton, 2004/10/26
- Re: the Seth Hypothetical, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/22
- RE: Re: When did we lose control?, Greg Connor, 2004/10/23
- RE: Re: When did we lose control?, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/23
- RE: Re: When did we lose control?, John Glube, 2004/10/22
- Regain control (was: When did we lose control?), Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/22
- Re: Regain control, wayne, 2004/10/22
- Re: Regain control, James Couzens, 2004/10/25
- Re: Regain control, wayne, 2004/10/25
- RE: Re: When did we lose control?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/10/21
- RE: Re: When did we lose control?, Stefan Engelbert, 2004/10/22
- RE: Re: When did we lose control?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/10/22
- RE: Re: When did we lose control?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/10/22
- RE: Re: When did we lose control?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/10/22
SenderID and v=spf1 - Please say NO,
william(at)elan.net,
2004/10/14
- Re: SenderID and v=spf1 - Please say NO, James Couzens, 2004/10/14
- Re: SenderID and v=spf1 - Please say NO, jpinkerton, 2004/10/14
- Re: SenderID and v=spf1 - Please say NO, wayne, 2004/10/15
- Re: SenderID and v=spf1 - Please say NO, Holm, Mark, 2004/10/15
- Re: SenderID and v=spf1 - Please say NO, Holm, Mark, 2004/10/15
- RE: SenderID and v=spf1 - Please say NO, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/10/15
- RE: SenderID and v=spf1 - Please say NO, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/10/15
It's published!,
Mark Lentczner,
2004/10/14
- Re: It's published!, csm, 2004/10/14
- Re: It's published!, Mark C. Langston, 2004/10/14
- Re: It's published!, James Couzens, 2004/10/14
- Re: It's published!, jpinkerton, 2004/10/14
- Re: It's published!, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/17
- Re: Re: It's published!, Commerco WebMaster, 2004/10/17
- Re: Re: It's published!, wayne, 2004/10/17
- Re: It's published!, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/17
- Re: Re: It's published!, wayne, 2004/10/17
- Re: It's published!, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/18
- website, jpinkerton, 2004/10/18
- Re: website, James Couzens, 2004/10/18
- Re: website, Jason Gurtz, 2004/10/18
- Re: website, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/18
- Re: Re: website, jpinkerton, 2004/10/19
- New news articles, jpinkerton, 2004/10/19
- Re: New news articles, jpinkerton, 2004/10/19
- Re: New news articles, Hector Santos, 2004/10/19
- Re: New news articles, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/19
- Re: New news articles, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/19
- Re: Re: New news articles, wayne, 2004/10/20
- RE: Re: New news articles, guy, 2004/10/20
- Re: Re: New news articles, jpinkerton, 2004/10/21
- Re: It's published!, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/17
RE: MAIL FROM address literals etc. (was: SPF v1 draft for review),
Raymond Neeves,
2004/10/13
- Re: MAIL FROM address literals etc. (was: SPF v1 draft for review), Mark, 2004/10/14
- Message not available
- Re: MAIL FROM address literals etc., Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/14
- Re: Re: MAIL FROM address literals etc., Mark, 2004/10/14
- RE: Re: MAIL FROM address literals etc., guy, 2004/10/14
- Question about the draft, guy, 2004/10/14
- Re: Question about the draft, Mark Lentczner, 2004/10/14
- RE: Question about the draft, Guy, 2004/10/14
- Add example to the draft - ptr, guy, 2004/10/14
- Unrecognized modifiers, guy, 2004/10/14
- Re: Unrecognized modifiers, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/17
- Unrecognized Mechanisms and Modifiers, guy, 2004/10/14
- 2.3 Checking Authorization, Guy, 2004/10/14
- Re: 2.3 Checking Authorization, David Brodbeck, 2004/10/14
- Re: 2.3 Checking Authorization, Mark Lentczner, 2004/10/14
- RE: 2.3 Checking Authorization, guy, 2004/10/14
- RE: 2.3 Checking Authorization, David Brodbeck, 2004/10/14
- Re: 2.3 Checking Authorization, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/17
- Re: Unrecognized Mechanisms and Modifiers, Mark Lentczner, 2004/10/14
- Re: Unrecognized Mechanisms and Modifiers, wayne, 2004/10/14
- RE: Unrecognized Mechanisms and Modifiers, guy, 2004/10/14
- RE: Re: MAIL FROM address literals etc., Roger Moser, 2004/10/14
[SPF v1 Draft] Submitted!,
Mark Lentczner,
2004/10/12
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Submitted!, Chuck Mead, 2004/10/13
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Submitted!, wayne, 2004/10/13
- RE: [SPF v1 Draft] Submitted!, John Glube, 2004/10/13
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Submitted!, jpinkerton, 2004/10/13
- Moving Forward ..., John Glube, 2004/10/13
- Re: Moving Forward ..., Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/13
- Re: Moving Forward ..., Carl Hutzler, 2004/10/13
- RE: Moving Forward ..., John Glube, 2004/10/13
- RE: Moving Forward ..., Rand Wacker, 2004/10/14
- RE: Moving Forward ..., John Glube, 2004/10/14
- Re: Moving Forward ..., wayne, 2004/10/15
- RE: Moving Forward ..., John Glube, 2004/10/13
- RE: Moving Forward ..., Mark Shewmaker, 2004/10/13
- Re: Moving Forward ..., Mark Lentczner, 2004/10/13
- RE: Moving Forward ..., terry, 2004/10/14
- Re: Moving Forward ..., wayne, 2004/10/15
- RE: Moving Forward ..., terry, 2004/10/13
- Re: Moving Forward ..., Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/13
- RE: Moving Forward ..., John Glube, 2004/10/13
- Re: Moving Forward ..., Koen Martens, 2004/10/14
- Re: Moving Forward ..., Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/14
- Re: Moving Forward ..., william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/14
- Re: Moving Forward ..., Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/10/14
- Re: Moving Forward ..., Michael Hammer, 2004/10/14
- RE: Moving Forward ..., John Glube, 2004/10/14
- will PRA checking take off anyway?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/15
- RE: will PRA checking take off anyway?, John Glube, 2004/10/15
- Re: will PRA checking take off anyway?, wayne, 2004/10/15
- Re: will PRA checking take off anyway?, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/15
- RE: will PRA checking take off anyway?, John Glube, 2004/10/15
- Re: will PRA checking take off anyway?, jpinkerton, 2004/10/16
- Re: will PRA checking take off anyway?, Nick Phillips, 2004/10/17
- Re: will PRA checking take off anyway?, jpinkerton, 2004/10/17
- Re: will PRA checking take off anyway?, Commerco WebMaster, 2004/10/17
- RE: will PRA checking take off anyway?, Bruce Barnes, 2004/10/17
- RE: will PRA checking take off anyway?, guy, 2004/10/17
- Re: will PRA checking take off anyway?, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/16
- Re: will PRA checking take off anyway?, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/17
- Re: Moving Forward ..., wayne, 2004/10/15
- Re: Moving Forward ..., Margaret Olson, 2004/10/16
- Re: Moving Forward ..., wayne, 2004/10/17
- Re: Moving Forward ..., Chris Haynes, 2004/10/14
- Re: Moving Forward ..., Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/14
- Re: Re: Moving Forward ..., william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/14
- Resposible SUBMITTER (was: Moving Forward ...), Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/17
- Re: Resposible SUBMITTER, wayne, 2004/10/17
- Re: Resposible SUBMITTER (was: Moving Forward ...), william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/18
[SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit...,
Mark Lentczner,
2004/10/11
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/10/12
- RE: Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., terry, 2004/10/12
- Re: Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., wayne, 2004/10/12
- Re: Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Hannah Schroeter, 2004/10/13
- Re: Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/10/13
- Re: Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., George Schlossnagle, 2004/10/13
- Re: Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Paul Ficinski, 2004/10/13
- Re: Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Hannah Schroeter, 2004/10/13
- Re: Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Mark Lentczner, 2004/10/13
- Re: Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Hannah Schroeter, 2004/10/13
- Re: Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., David Brodbeck, 2004/10/13
- RE: Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., guy, 2004/10/13
- Re: Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/10/13
- Re: Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Chris Haynes, 2004/10/13
- Re: Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Hannah Schroeter, 2004/10/27
- Re: Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/10/27
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/12
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Mark Shewmaker, 2004/10/12
- [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Roy Badami, 2004/10/12
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/12
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Hannah Schroeter, 2004/10/12
- RE: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., John Glube, 2004/10/12
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/12
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., wayne, 2004/10/12
- RE: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., guy, 2004/10/12
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/13
- Re: Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., wayne, 2004/10/13
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/13
- Re: Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/13
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/13
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/10/13
- draft-schlitt-spf-00pre1 now available (Was: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit...), wayne, 2004/10/14
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre2 now available, wayne, 2004/10/15
- RE: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre2 now available, guy, 2004/10/16
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre2 suggestions, Andy Bakun, 2004/10/17
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre2 suggestions, wayne, 2004/10/17
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre2 suggestions, Andy Bakun, 2004/10/17
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre2 suggestions, wayne, 2004/10/17
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre2 now available, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/10/17
- Re: Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre2 now available, wayne, 2004/10/17
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., wayne, 2004/10/14
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Mark, 2004/10/14
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/10/14
- RE: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., guy, 2004/10/14
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Larry Smith, 2004/10/14
- [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Roger Moser, 2004/10/15
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/15
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., David Brodbeck, 2004/10/15
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Koen Martens, 2004/10/15
- [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Roger Moser, 2004/10/15
- RE: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., terry, 2004/10/15
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/17
- RE: Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., terry, 2004/10/17
- RE: Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Guy, 2004/10/17
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/17
- Re: Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., jpinkerton, 2004/10/17
- Re: Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Koen Martens, 2004/10/17
- Re: Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., David Brodbeck, 2004/10/19
- Re: Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/10/19
- Re: Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Koen Martens, 2004/10/19
- Re: Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/10/19
- Re: Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., David Brodbeck, 2004/10/19
- Re: Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., jpinkerton, 2004/10/19
- Possible public political activities to stop SenderID abuse of v=spf1 (was - Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..), william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/19
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/19
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., David Brodbeck, 2004/10/15
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Mark Shewmaker, 2004/10/14
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., wayne, 2004/10/14
- RE: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., guy, 2004/10/14
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Mark Shewmaker, 2004/10/14
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Mark, 2004/10/14
- [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Roger Moser, 2004/10/15
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Mark Lentczner, 2004/10/14
spf entries for which hosts ???,
Margrit Lottmann,
2004/10/11
- Re: spf entries for which hosts ???, Koen Martens, 2004/10/11
- Re: spf entries for which hosts ???, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/11
- Re: spf entries for which hosts ???, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/11
- Re: spf entries for which hosts ???, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/11
- Has Meng sold us out to M$? -- WAS -- Re: spf entries for which hosts ???, jpinkerton, 2004/10/11
- Re: Has Meng sold us out to M$? -- WAS -- Re: spf entries for which hosts ???, wayne, 2004/10/12
- Re: Has Meng sold us out to M$? -- WAS -- Re: spf entries for which hosts ???, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/10/13
- Re: Has Meng sold us out to M$?, jpinkerton, 2004/10/13
- Re: Re: Has Meng sold us out to M$?, Koen Martens, 2004/10/13
- Re: Re: Has Meng sold us out to M$?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/13
- Re: Re: Has Meng sold us out to M$?, Chuck Mead, 2004/10/13
- Re: Re: Has Meng sold us out to M$?, Mark, 2004/10/13
- Re: Re: Has Meng sold us out to M$?, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com>, 2004/10/13
- RE: Re: Has Meng sold us out to M$?, guy, 2004/10/13
- Re: Re: Has Meng sold us out to M$?, jpinkerton, 2004/10/14
- Re: Re: Has Meng sold us out to M$?, Koen Martens, 2004/10/14
- Re: Re: Has Meng sold us out to M$?, jpinkerton, 2004/10/14
- Re: Re: Has Meng sold us out to M$?, spf, 2004/10/14
- Re: Re: Has Meng sold us out to M$?, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/14
- Message not available
- Re: spf entries for which hosts ???, Commerco WebMaster, 2004/10/11
- Re: spf entries for which hosts ???, Commerco WebMaster, 2004/10/11
- Re: spf entries for which hosts ???, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/11
- RE: spf entries for which hosts ???, guy, 2004/10/11
- RE: spf entries for which hosts ???, terry, 2004/10/12
- spf entries for which hosts ???, Roger Moser, 2004/10/11
- RE: spf entries for which hosts ???, guy, 2004/10/12
- RE: spf entries for which hosts ???, guy, 2004/10/12
- RE: spf entries for which hosts ???, terry, 2004/10/12
- Re: spf entries for which hosts ???, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/10/12
- Re: spf entries for which hosts ???, Greg Connor, 2004/10/12
- Re: spf entries for which hosts ???, Commerco WebMaster, 2004/10/13
- Re: spf entries for which hosts ???, Greg Connor, 2004/10/17
- RE: spf entries for which hosts ???, guy, 2004/10/11
- Re: spf entries for which hosts ???, Commerco WebMaster, 2004/10/11
How can this work?,
Dan Barker,
2004/10/07
- Re: How can this work?, Daniel Taylor, 2004/10/07
- Re: How can this work?, Alan Hodgson, 2004/10/07
- Re: How can this work?, Ernesto Baschny, 2004/10/07
- RE: How can this work?, guy, 2004/10/07
- Re: How can this work?, David Brodbeck, 2004/10/07
- Re: How can this work?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/10/07
- Re: How can this work?, Holm, Mark, 2004/10/07
- Re: How can this work?, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/07
- Re: Re: How can this work?, jpinkerton, 2004/10/08
- A page with links to all existing SPF Web tools - WAS - Re: Re: How can this work?, jpinkerton, 2004/10/08
- Re: A page with links to all existing SPF Web tools - WAS - Re: Re: How can this work?, James Couzens, 2004/10/08
- Re: A page with links to all existing SPF Web tools - WAS - Re:Re: How can this work?, jpinkerton, 2004/10/10
- Re: A page with links to all existing SPF Web tools - WAS - Re:Re: How can this work?, jpinkerton, 2004/10/18
- Anti-spam article in the Baltimore Sun, guy, 2004/10/18
- RE: Anti-spam article in the Baltimore Sun, guy, 2004/10/19
- RE: Anti-spam article in the Baltimore Sun, Andy Bakun, 2004/10/19
- Re: Anti-spam article in the Baltimore Sun, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/19
- Re: Anti-spam article in the Baltimore Sun, jpinkerton, 2004/10/20
- RE: Re: How can this work?, administrator, 2004/10/08
- Re: Re: How can this work?, Mark, 2004/10/08
Meeting at IETF 61,
Stephane Bortzmeyer,
2004/10/06
- Re: Meeting at IETF 61, Dale Ghent, 2004/10/06
- RE: Meeting at IETF 61, guy, 2004/10/06
- Re: Meeting at IETF 61, Chip Mefford, 2004/10/07
- Re: Meeting at IETF 61, Michael Hammer, 2004/10/07
- Who is coming to NANOG/ARIN?, Chip Mefford, 2004/10/12
- Re: Who is coming to NANOG/ARIN?, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/10/12
- RE: Who is coming to NANOG/ARIN?, guy, 2004/10/12
- Re: Who is coming to NANOG/ARIN?, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/10/12
- Re: Who is coming to NANOG/ARIN?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/10/13
- Who is coming to NANOG/ARIN?, Tim Kennedy, 2004/10/13
- Re: Who is coming to NANOG/ARIN?, Chip Mefford, 2004/10/13
- Re: Who is coming to NANOG/ARIN?, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/12
Extreme times call for extreme measures?,
Jon Bertrand,
2004/10/06
- Re: Extreme times call for extreme measures?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/06
- Re: Extreme times call for extreme measures?, Mark, 2004/10/06
- RE: Extreme times call for extreme measures?, terry, 2004/10/06
- Re: Extreme times call for extreme measures?, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/06
- Re: Extreme times call for extreme measures?, Koen Martens, 2004/10/06
- Re: Extreme times call for extreme measures?, administrator, 2004/10/07
[SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be kept out,
Stephane Bortzmeyer,
2004/10/06
- Re: [SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be kept out, Tony Finch, 2004/10/06
- Re: [SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be kept out, Mark, 2004/10/06
- Re: [SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be kept out, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/07
- Re: Re: [SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be kept out, Tony Finch, 2004/10/07
- Re: Re: [SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be kept out, John Hinton, 2004/10/07
- RE: Re: [SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be kept out, Scott Kitterman, 2004/10/07
- RE: Re: [SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be kept out, guy, 2004/10/07
- Where is the current draft of spf classic and unified, guy, 2004/10/07
- Re: [SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be kept out, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/07
- Re: Re: [SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be kept out, wayne, 2004/10/07
- Re: Re: [SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be kept out, Tony Finch, 2004/10/07
- Re: Re: [SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be kept out, wayne, 2004/10/07
- RE: Re: [SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be kept out, guy, 2004/10/07
- RE: Re: [SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be kept out, guy, 2004/10/07
- RE: Re: [SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be kept out, Tony Finch, 2004/10/07
- Re: Re: [SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be kept out, Daniel Taylor, 2004/10/07
- Re: Re: [SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be kept out, Tony Finch, 2004/10/07
- Re: Re: [SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be kept out, Daniel Taylor, 2004/10/07
- Re: Re: [SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be kept out, Tony Finch, 2004/10/07
- Re: Re: [SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be kept out, Daniel Taylor, 2004/10/07
- Re: Re: [SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be kept out, Tony Finch, 2004/10/07
- Re: Re: [SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be kept out, wayne, 2004/10/07
- Re: Re: [SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be kept out, Daniel Taylor, 2004/10/07
- Re: [SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be kept out, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/07
- Re: Re: [SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be kept out, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/10/07
- RE: Re: [SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be kept out, Scott Kitterman, 2004/10/07
- RE: Re: [SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be kept out, Tony Finch, 2004/10/07
- Forwarding and SPF/SRS, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/10/07
- Re: Re: [SPF Classic] Policy best practices should be kept out, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/10/08
SPF v1 draft for review,
Mark Lentczner,
2004/10/05
- Re: SPF v1 draft for review, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com>, 2004/10/05
- Re: SPF v1 draft for review, Commerco WebMaster, 2004/10/06
- Re: SPF v1 draft for review, jpinkerton, 2004/10/06
- SPF v1 draft for review, Roger Moser, 2004/10/06
- Re: SPF v1 draft for review, Peter Karsai, 2004/10/06
- Re: SPF v1 draft for review, Roger Moser, 2004/10/06
- Re: SPF v1 draft for review, Peter Karsai, 2004/10/06
- Re: SPF v1 draft for review, Mark, 2004/10/06
- Re: SPF v1 draft for review, Peter Karsai, 2004/10/06
- Re: SPF v1 draft for review, Mark Lentczner, 2004/10/06
- RE: SPF v1 draft for review, terry, 2004/10/06
- Re: SPF v1 draft for review, spf, 2004/10/06
- Re: SPF v1 draft for review, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/06
- Re: SPF v1 draft for review, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/10/06
- Re: SPF v1 draft for review, Peter Karsai, 2004/10/07
- [SPF classic] Organizing the discussion (Was: SPF v1 draft for review, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/10/07
- [SPF classic] Organizing the discussion (Was: SPF v1 draft for review, Roger Moser, 2004/10/07
- Re: SPF v1 draft for review, Mark, 2004/10/06
- Re: SPF v1 draft for review, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/06
- Re: SPF v1 draft for review, Koen Martens, 2004/10/06
Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune,
Lou Katz,
2004/10/04
- Re: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, Commerco WebMaster, 2004/10/04
- Re: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, jpinkerton, 2004/10/04
- Re: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/04
- PR director needed for SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/06
- Re: PR director needed for SPF, Koen Martens, 2004/10/06
- Re: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, James Couzens, 2004/10/21
- RE: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, Richard Bang, 2004/10/21
- RE: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, James Couzens, 2004/10/21
- RE: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, Richard Bang, 2004/10/21
- RE: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, James Couzens, 2004/10/21
- Re: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, George Schlossnagle, 2004/10/21
- Re: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, James Couzens, 2004/10/21
- RE: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, Rand Wacker, 2004/10/21
- Re: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, wayne, 2004/10/21
- Re: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, Rand Wacker, 2004/10/21
- Re: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, George Schlossnagle, 2004/10/21
- Re: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, wayne, 2004/10/21
- Re: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, Rand Wacker, 2004/10/21
- Re: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, wayne, 2004/10/21
- RE: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, James Couzens, 2004/10/21
- Re: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/10/21
- Re: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, James Couzens, 2004/10/21
- Re: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, Koen Martens, 2004/10/21
- Re: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, Rand Wacker, 2004/10/21
- RE: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, Rand Wacker, 2004/10/21
- RE: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, James Couzens, 2004/10/21
- Re: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/10/21
- Re: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, James Couzens, 2004/10/21
- RE: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/10/21
- RE: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, John Glube, 2004/10/04
- Re: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, Steven Earl Smith, 2004/10/04
- Re: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, Holm, Mark, 2004/10/21
- Re: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/10/22
- Re: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/22
- OT: prostitutes (was Re: Re: Article in Oakland (CA) Tribune), Hannah Schroeter, 2004/10/25
- Forwarders (was: OT: prostitutes), Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/27
- Explain, Mike, 2004/10/27
- Re: Explain, Mike, 2004/10/27
- Re: Explain, M Z Rahman, 2004/10/28
- Re: Explain, Mike, 2004/10/28
- Re: Explain, M Z Rahman, 2004/10/28
- Re: Explain, Greg Connor, 2004/10/28
- Re: Explain, Mike, 2004/10/28
Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA.,
Danny Angus,
2004/10/04
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com>, 2004/10/04
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Danny Angus, 2004/10/04
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/04
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Chip Mefford, 2004/10/04
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Eric S. Raymond, 2004/10/04
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Chuck Mead, 2004/10/04
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/04
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Tim Kennedy, 2004/10/04
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Dale Ghent, 2004/10/04
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com>, 2004/10/04
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., wayne, 2004/10/04
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/04
- RE: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., terry, 2004/10/04
- RE: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/10/04
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Chuck Mead, 2004/10/04
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Lou Katz, 2004/10/04
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com>, 2004/10/04
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., David Brodbeck, 2004/10/05
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/10/05
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Chip Mefford, 2004/10/05
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Lou Katz, 2004/10/04
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Larry Hand, 2004/10/04
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Graham Murray, 2004/10/04
Weekly SPF discussion mailinglist stats for 10/04/04,
Wayne Schlitt,
2004/10/03
- Bug? Re: Weekly SPF discussion mailinglist stats for 10/04/04, Hector Santos, 2004/10/04
- Re: Bug? Re: Weekly SPF discussion mailinglist stats for 10/04/04, wayne, 2004/10/04
- Re: Bug? Re: Weekly SPF discussion mailinglist stats for 10/04/04, Hector Santos, 2004/10/04
- RE: Bug? Re: Weekly SPF discussion mailinglist stats for 10/04/04, Scott Kitterman, 2004/10/05
- Re: Bug? Re: Weekly SPF discussion mailinglist stats for 10/04/04, Hector Santos, 2004/10/05
- Forum Stats Generator, Hector Santos, 2004/10/05
- Re: Bug? Re: Weekly SPF discussion mailinglist stats for 10/04/04, Koen Martens, 2004/10/05
- RE: Bug? Re: Weekly SPF discussion mailinglist stats for 10/04/04, Scott Kitterman, 2004/10/06
- Re: Bug? Re: Weekly SPF discussion mailinglist stats for 10/04/04, Hector Santos, 2004/10/06
- Re: Bug? Re: Weekly SPF discussion mailinglist stats for 10/04/04, David Brodbeck, 2004/10/06
- Re: Bug? Re: Weekly SPF discussion mailinglist stats for 10/04/04, Koen Martens, 2004/10/06
- Re: Bug? Re: Weekly SPF discussion mailinglist stats for 10/04/04, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/07
What to include...,
Mark Lentczner,
2004/10/03
- Re: What to include..., Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/03
- Re: What to include..., Jim Hill, 2004/10/04
- Re: What to include..., william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/04
- Re: What to include..., Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/10/04
- Re: What to include..., Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/10/04
- Re: What to include..., Scott Kitterman, 2004/10/03
- Re: What to include..., administrator, 2004/10/04
- Re: What to include..., Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/04
- Re: What to include..., Hector Santos, 2004/10/04
- Re: What to include..., Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/04
- Re: What to include..., Mark, 2004/10/04
- Re: What to include..., Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/04
- Re: What to include..., Mark, 2004/10/04
- Re: What to include..., wayne, 2004/10/04
- Re: What to include..., Hector Santos, 2004/10/04
- Re: What to include..., Hector Santos, 2004/10/04
- Re: What to include..., Mark, 2004/10/04
- Re: What to include..., Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/10/04
- Re: What to include..., Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/05
- Re: Re: What to include..., Hector Santos, 2004/10/05
- Re: Re: What to include..., Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/10/05
- Re: Re: What to include..., Hector Santos, 2004/10/05
- Re: What to include..., Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/05
- Re: Re: What to include..., Greg Connor, 2004/10/05
- Re: Re: What to include..., Hector Santos, 2004/10/05
- Message not available
- Re: Re: What to include..., Mark, 2004/10/06
- Re: What to include..., administrator, 2004/10/05
- Re: What to include..., Mark, 2004/10/05
Moving Forward, My Plan,
Mark Lentczner,
2004/10/02
- Re: Moving Forward, My Plan, Jim Hill, 2004/10/02
- Re: Moving Forward, My Plan, Koen Martens, 2004/10/03
- Re: Moving Forward, My Plan, Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/03
- Re: Moving Forward, My Plan, Chuck Mead, 2004/10/04
Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA.,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/10/02
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Andy Bakun, 2004/10/02
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., wayne, 2004/10/02
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Jim Hill, 2004/10/02
- RE: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., John Glube, 2004/10/02
- Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Roger Moser, 2004/10/02
- RE: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., John Glube, 2004/10/03
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Greg Connor, 2004/10/03
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., jpinkerton, 2004/10/03
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Frank Ellermann, 2004/10/03
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/04
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., spf, 2004/10/04
- Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA., Michael Hammer, 2004/10/06
Re: Trying to specify SPF Classic?,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/10/01
- Re: Trying to specify SPF Classic?, Jim Hill, 2004/10/01
- Re: Trying to specify SPF Classic?, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/01
- Re: Trying to specify SPF Classic?, Hector Santos, 2004/10/01
- Re: Trying to specify SPF Classic?, wayne, 2004/10/01
- Re: Trying to specify SPF Classic?, jpinkerton, 2004/10/02
- Re: Trying to specify SPF Classic?, Michael Hammer, 2004/10/06
RE: Moving forward,
Scott Kitterman,
2004/10/01
- Re: Moving forward, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com>, 2004/10/01
- Re: Moving forward, jpinkerton, 2004/10/01
- Re: Moving forward, wayne, 2004/10/01
- Re: Moving forward, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/01
- Re: Moving forward, wayne, 2004/10/01
- RE: Moving forward, John Glube, 2004/10/01
- Re: Moving forward, wayne, 2004/10/01
- Re: Moving forward, jpinkerton, 2004/10/01
- RE: Moving forward, John Glube, 2004/10/01
- Re: Moving forward, wayne, 2004/10/01
- Re: Moving forward, Mark Lentczner, 2004/10/01
- Re: Moving forward, wayne, 2004/10/01
- RE: Moving forward, John Glube, 2004/10/01
- Re: Moving forward, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/10/02
- Re: Moving forward, Jim Hill, 2004/10/01
- Re: Moving forward, wayne, 2004/10/01
- Re: Moving forward, Graham Murray, 2004/10/01
- Re: Moving forward, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com>, 2004/10/01
- Re: Moving forward, Michael Hammer, 2004/10/01
- Re: Moving forward, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/10/02
- Re: Moving forward, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/10/02
- Re: Moving forward, Michael Hammer, 2004/10/01
- Re: Re: Moving forward, wayne, 2004/10/01
- Re: Moving forward, John Hinton, 2004/10/01
SES (was moving on from MARID),
Seth Goodman,
2004/10/01
- RE: SES (was moving on from MARID), John Glube, 2004/10/01
- RE: SES (was moving on from MARID), Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/10/01
- RE: SES (was moving on from MARID), Tony Finch, 2004/10/01
- Re: SES (was moving on from MARID), Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/01
- Re: SES, wayne, 2004/10/01
- Re: SES, James Couzens, 2004/10/03
- Re: SES, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/03
- Re: SES, James Couzens, 2004/10/03
- Re: SES, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/03
- SES, Roger Moser, 2004/10/03
- Re: SES, James Couzens, 2004/10/03
- Re: SES, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/10/04
- RE: SES, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/04
- Re: SES, George Schlossnagle, 2004/10/04
- Re: SES, David Brodbeck, 2004/10/05
- RE: SES, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/05
- Re: SES, Joe Rhett, 2004/10/11
- Re: SES, Hector Santos, 2004/10/04
- Re: SES, Tony Finch, 2004/10/04
- SES (was moving on from MARID), Roger Moser, 2004/10/04
- Re: SES (was moving on from MARID), Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/10/04
Re: The pretty name,
Hector Santos,
2004/09/30
- Re: The pretty name, Graham Murray, 2004/09/30
- 2822 Header Analysis [Re: The pretty name], Hector Santos, 2004/09/30
- Re: 2822 Header Analysis [Re: The pretty name], Mark Shewmaker, 2004/10/01
- Re: 2822 Header Analysis [Re: The pretty name], Hector Santos, 2004/10/01
- Re: 2822 Header Analysis [Re: The pretty name], Mark Shewmaker, 2004/10/01
- Re: 2822 Header Analysis [Re: The pretty name], Paul Howarth, 2004/10/01
- Re: 2822 Header Analysis [Re: The pretty name], william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/01
- Re: 2822 Header Analysis [Re: The pretty name], Jason Gurtz, 2004/10/01
- Re: 2822 Header Analysis [Re: The pretty name], Hector Santos, 2004/10/01
- Re: 2822 Header Analysis [Re: The pretty name], Greg Hewgill, 2004/10/01
- SPF-Enabled open-source product announcement and request-for-input: Generic anti-spam platform, Chris Drake, 2004/10/01
- RE: The pretty name, Stefan Engelbert, 2004/10/01
- Re: The pretty name, Mark, 2004/10/01
- Re: The pretty name, Ryan Malayter, 2004/10/01
- Re: Re: The pretty name, Ryan Malayter, 2004/10/01
- Re: The pretty name, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/10/01