[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com]On Behalf Of David
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 10:36 AM
Subject: RE: [spf-discuss] Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for
On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 10:26 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Last time I posted the problems I had with the "alternatives", you didn't
reply to that post.
Was that the S/MIME one? I couldn't read it, although I did upgrade my
MUA today, and now I can. I'll take a look.
Which of these so called alternatives can provide forgery
for those of us who are domain owners, but not DNS server or MTA
I see nothing which prevents you from doing DK or IIM in your MUA. You
do need the MTA to co-operate for SES though.
I also posted it again without the signature.
Could you post links to where I can download software to sign DK/IIM? I'm
certainly open to looking into it.