"jp" == jpinkerton
"Re: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes"
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:21:14 +0100
jp> From: "wayne" <wayne(_at_)schlitt(_dot_)net>
jp> To: <spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com>
jp> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 4:53 AM
jp> Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Condorcet Voting for Council
jp> Elections and Council Votes
>> I would much rather see either approval voting or CSSD than
>> pluarity voting. I mildly favor approval voting over CSSD
>> because it is simpler.
jp> OK - Both types are easily incorporated into the scripts I
jp> wrote, and I'm cool with either - even if one sounds quite
jp> painful ;-)
jp> I am still disappointed with the fact that the *real* work of
jp> the spf council is not moving forward very quickly.
What could be simpler and less time consuming than a disinterested
third party service such as the Condorcet Internet Voting Service at
<http://www5.cs.cornell.edu/~andru/civs/> or similar?