On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, David Woodhouse wrote:
I'm not OK with my address being spoofed. But I'm not OK with the
breakage that SPF introduces either. So I implement some of the better
forgery-prevention techniques instead of SPF. It's certainly not
ignorance or apathy.
Huh? SPF only rejects email that the sender SPECIFICALLY ASKS to
be rejected via his SPF record. Are you talking about recipients
that check SPF but screw up their configuration (e.g. non-SRS forwarders)?
I hate to break it you, but that kind of recipient will always find a way to
screw up some configuration somewhere.
Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flamis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.