spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV

2005-07-05 11:32:55
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

David Woodhouse wrote:
The only feasible way [receivers] can support forwarding is to refrain
from rejecting mail for an SPF failure. 

Absolutely true.  Note, however, that they don't have to refrain from 
rejecting on SPF "Fail" for _all_ the mail they receive, but just for that 
received from their configured forwarders.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCytJXwL7PKlBZWjsRAte+AJ9HyMpCDGSCbAtpksEgaLWdVn7ZhwCdFo+e
Kukc0t5TFX6NYL6wDYi0fis=
=74Vh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>