Re: No more xxxx=yes please

william(at)elan.net wrote:

> I'm not in favor of simplicity over functionality. My
> position on this (old) debate is probably close to how IETF
> typically does its protocol work, but they are often enough
> criticized for the results as well.
IBTD.  Those IETFers tend to hit me with RfC 1958, among other
things you find KISS in this FYI, "end-to-end security", and
the author is the current IETF Chair.

So far I don't see why we don't discuss op=smime instead of
say DKIM, meta, eh=, or op=pra.
                                Bye, Frank