SPF Discuss (date)
September 26, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:33
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Dick St.Peters, 11:16
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Stuart D. Gathman, 09:29
- [spf-discuss] Re: Can this really be true?, Frank Ellermann, 08:14
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Hector Santos, 06:55
September 25, 2005
- RE: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Seth Goodman, 13:11
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, johnp, 09:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Scott Kitterman, 07:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 06:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Scott Kitterman, 06:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, johnp, 06:37
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, johnp, 06:11
- RE: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Seth Goodman, 03:47
- [spf-discuss] Re: Can this really be true?, Frank Ellermann, 01:16
September 24, 2005
- [spf-discuss] SPF Mail Summary Report, spf-discuss, 19:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Dick St.Peters, 19:03
- [spf-discuss] SPF / SRS problems., Xavier Beaudouin, 11:03
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, johnp, 02:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Can this really be true?, johnp, 01:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, johnp, 01:46
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Can this really be true?, Mark, 01:38
- [spf-discuss] Re: Can this really be true?, Frank Ellermann, 01:25
- RE: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Mark, 01:21
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, johnp, 00:14
September 23, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Dick St.Peters, 20:27
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Gaven Henderson, 17:28
- RE: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Mark, 14:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Dick St.Peters, 14:08
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, johnp, 13:35
- [spf-discuss] Re: Can this really be true?, Frank Ellermann, 13:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Scott Kitterman, 13:04
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, johnp, 12:38
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Can this really be true?, Mark, 12:36
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Can this really be true?, johnp, 12:25
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF and gateways, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:40
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF and gateways, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:25
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Can this really be true?, Scott Kitterman, 11:18
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Can this really be true?, paddy, 09:48
- [spf-discuss] Re: Can this really be true?, Frank Ellermann, 09:25
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF and gateways, Frank Ellermann, 09:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Andy Bakun, 09:01
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Dick St.Peters, 08:18
- [spf-discuss] IBM help please, dejanspf, 07:39
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF and gateways, Simon Tyler, 07:36
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF and gateways, johnp, 07:10
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF and gateways, Simon Tyler, 07:00
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF and gateways, Simon Tyler, 06:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF and gateways, johnp, 06:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF and gateways, johnp, 06:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF and gateways, Simon Tyler, 06:36
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF and gateways, Simon Tyler, 06:31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF and gateways, johnp, 06:28
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF and gateways, Dan Field, 06:22
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF and gateways, Simon Tyler, 06:18
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, johnp, 05:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Scott Kitterman, 05:36
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF and gateways, Jeremy Harris, 05:13
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF and gateways, Frank Ellermann, 04:56
- [spf-discuss] Re: Can this really be true?, Frank Ellermann, 04:46
- RE: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Bruce Barnes, 04:43
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF and gateways, Mark, 04:34
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Scott Kitterman, 04:30
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF and gateways, Mark, 04:24
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF and gateways, Frank Ellermann, 04:21
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF and gateways, Mark, 04:20
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, johnp, 03:54
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Jeremy Harris, 03:20
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF and gateways, johnp, 02:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF and gateways, Simon Tyler, 01:52
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF and gateways, johnp, 01:43
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF and gateways, Simon Tyler, 01:30
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF and gateways, johnp, 01:22
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, johnp, 01:19
- [spf-discuss] SPF and gateways, Simon Tyler, 01:16
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Andy Bakun, 00:42
September 22, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Dick St.Peters, 19:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Andy Bakun, 17:36
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Dick St.Peters, 14:48
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:34
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Terry Fielder, 13:24
- Re: [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, Jeremy Doupe, 13:10
- [spf-discuss] Can this really be true?, johnp, 13:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Anyone Got an Explanation?, Graham Murray, 07:11
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Anyone Got an Explanation?, Dick St.Peters, 06:30
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Anyone Got an Explanation?, Scott Kitterman, 06:14
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Anyone Got an Explanation?, Dick St.Peters, 06:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Anyone Got an Explanation?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 04:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Anyone Got an Explanation?, David Woodhouse, 02:46
September 21, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Anyone Got an Explanation?, Theo Schlossnagle, 19:26
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Anyone Got an Explanation?, David Woodhouse, 16:11
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Anyone Got an Explanation?, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Anyone Got an Explanation?, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Anyone Got an Explanation?, Dennis Willson, 14:54
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Anyone Got an Explanation?, Seth Goodman, 14:34
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Anyone Got an Explanation?, Dick St.Peters, 13:47
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Anyone Got an Explanation?, Scott Kitterman, 12:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Anyone Got an Explanation?, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Anyone Got an Explanation?, Dick St.Peters, 11:48
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Anyone Got an Explanation?, David Woodhouse, 10:16
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Anyone Got an Explanation?, Stuart D. Gathman, 09:29
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Anyone Got an Explanation?, David Woodhouse, 03:59
September 19, 2005
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Anyone Got an Explanation?, Seth Goodman, 15:36
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Anyone Got an Explanation?, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:15
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Anyone Got an Explanation?, Seth Goodman, 12:45
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Anyone Got an Explanation?, Mark, 11:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Anyone Got an Explanation?, Terry Fielder, 10:57
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Anyone Got an Explanation?, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Anyone Got an Explanation?, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:39
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Anyone Got an Explanation?, David Woodhouse, 03:02
September 15, 2005
- Re: NOT OFFLIST - RE: [spf-discuss] Archives (was:solving the forwarding problem), Scott Kitterman, 19:10
- RE: [spf-discuss] use of mydomain.com, Guy, 19:05
- RE: [spf-discuss] use of mydomain.com, Scott Kitterman, 18:41
- OFFLIST - RE: [spf-discuss] Archives (was:solving the forwarding problem), Seth Goodman, 14:45
- RE: [spf-discuss] use of mydomain.com, Seth Goodman, 14:15
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Dick St.Peters, 14:06
- RE: [spf-discuss] use of mydomain.com, Seth Goodman, 14:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] use of mydomain.com, Commerco WebMaster, 13:57
- Re: [spf-discuss] use of mydomain.com, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 12:39
- Re: [spf-discuss] use of mydomain.com, Mark Jeftovic, 12:29
- Re: [spf-discuss] use of mydomain.com, Commerco WebMaster, 12:24
- RE: [spf-discuss] Alias forwarder as associate MX, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:10
- RE: [spf-discuss] Alias forwarder as associate MX, Seth Goodman, 11:27
- RE: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Seth Goodman, 11:13
- RE: [spf-discuss] Alias forwarder as associate MX, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:06
- RE: [spf-discuss] Alias forwarder as associate MX, Seth Goodman, 10:48
- RE: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Mark, 10:41
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: solving the forwarding problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:41
- RE: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Dick St.Peters, 10:02
- [spf-discuss] use of mydomain.com, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 09:51
- [spf-discuss] Archives (was:solving the forwarding problem), Scott Kitterman, 09:04
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: solving the forwarding problem, Seth Goodman, 08:59
- [spf-discuss] Alias forwarder as associate MX, Stuart D. Gathman, 08:12
- [spf-discuss] spf-milter to libspf, Luiz Eduardo de Carvalho Barreto, 08:03
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 07:31
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Dick St.Peters, 07:07
- RE: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Mark, 05:11
September 14, 2005
- [spf-discuss] Re: solving the forwarding problem, Frank Ellermann, 20:11
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 18:21
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: solving the forwarding problem, Seth Goodman, 17:36
- RE: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Seth Goodman, 17:07
- [spf-discuss] Re: solving the forwarding problem, Frank Ellermann, 16:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 15:48
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: solving the forwarding problem, Seth Goodman, 15:47
- [spf-discuss] Re: solving the forwarding problem, Frank Ellermann, 15:35
- [spf-discuss] Re: FTC email authentication test results, Frank Ellermann, 15:28
- RE: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Seth Goodman, 15:19
- RE: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Dick St.Peters, 14:32
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 14:11
- RE: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Seth Goodman, 13:43
- Re: [spf-discuss] FTC email authentication test results, Hector Santos, 09:26
- Re: [spf-discuss] FTC email authentication test results, Stuart D. Gathman, 08:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: solving the forwarding problem, Dick St.Peters, 08:11
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: solving the forwarding problem, Scott Kitterman, 05:57
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: solving the forwarding problem, Dick St.Peters, 05:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Håkon Alstadheim, 03:50
- RE: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Mark, 03:31
- RE: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Mark, 02:54
- RE: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Mark, 02:33
September 13, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] FTC email authentication test results, johnp, 23:47
- [spf-discuss] FTC email authentication test results, wayne, 19:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 18:58
- [spf-discuss] Re: solving the forwarding problem, Frank Ellermann, 16:28
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: solving the forwarding problem, Dick St.Peters, 14:52
- RE: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Seth Goodman, 14:48
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Dick St.Peters, 13:26
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Mark Shewmaker, 13:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Dick St.Peters, 12:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: DKIM modifier, Scott Kitterman, 04:28
- [spf-discuss] Re: DKIM modifier, Frank Ellermann, 01:00
September 12, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] DKIM modifier, Scott Kitterman, 21:15
- [spf-discuss] Re: solving the forwarding problem, Frank Ellermann, 17:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:31
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Dick St.Peters, 14:28
- [spf-discuss] Re: solving the forwarding problem, Frank Ellermann, 13:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Terry Fielder, 13:39
- [spf-discuss] Re: solving the forwarding problem, Frank Ellermann, 13:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Theo Schlossnagle, 13:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] DKIM modifier, Scott Kitterman, 11:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: DKIM modifier, Scott Kitterman, 11:24
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:36
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Mark Shewmaker, 08:57
- Re: [spf-discuss] DKIM modifier, william(at)elan.net, 07:49
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Theo Schlossnagle, 07:13
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Julian Mehnle, 07:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, johnp, 06:57
- Re: [spf-discuss] DKIM modifier, Julian Mehnle, 06:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, johnp, 06:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Theo Schlossnagle, 06:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Theo Schlossnagle, 06:09
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Julian Mehnle, 05:54
September 11, 2005
- [spf-discuss] Re: DKIM modifier, Frank Ellermann, 23:33
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 21:04
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Mark Shewmaker, 20:20
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Hector Santos, 19:08
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Theo Schlossnagle, 15:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:21
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Theo Schlossnagle, 15:09
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, David Woodhouse, 13:32
- Re: [spf-discuss] spf whitelist, Scott Kitterman, 12:37
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: DKIM modifier, Scott Kitterman, 11:33
- [spf-discuss] Re: solving the forwarding problem, Frank Ellermann, 09:17
- [spf-discuss] Re: DKIM modifier, Frank Ellermann, 08:48
- Re: [spf-discuss] DKIM modifier (was: solving the forwarding problem), Scott Kitterman, 08:03
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Scott Kitterman, 06:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Julian Mehnle, 05:01
- [spf-discuss] spf whitelist, avudz, 04:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, David, 02:00
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Hector Santos, 01:29
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, David, 01:15
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, David, 00:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, johnp, 00:39
September 10, 2005
- [spf-discuss] DKIM modifier (was: solving the forwarding problem), Frank Ellermann, 23:11
- [spf-discuss] Re: solving the forwarding problem, Frank Ellermann, 22:37
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Dick St.Peters, 20:10
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Scott Kitterman, 20:07
- [spf-discuss] SPF Mail Summary Report, spf-discuss, 19:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Raymond Neeves, 19:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, william(at)elan.net, 17:36
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Theo Schlossnagle, 17:30
- Re: [spf-discuss] A Wild Idea (was: Questions on unified policy), Stuart D. Gathman, 15:08
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:51
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:40
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, David, 09:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, william(at)elan.net, 08:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, David, 07:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 07:31
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, william(at)elan.net, 07:15
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, David, 06:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Theo Schlossnagle, 06:08
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 05:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, David, 04:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 04:21
- [spf-discuss] solving the forwarding problem, David, 03:40
September 08, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] A Wild Idea (was: Questions on unified policy), william(at)elan.net, 13:57
- RE: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Seth Goodman, 13:57
- Re: [spf-discuss] Incorporate?, Morris Inouye, 13:48
- Re: [spf-discuss] Incorporate?, Commerco WebMaster, 13:14
- RE: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:45
- [spf-discuss] A Wild Idea (was: Questions on unified policy), Stuart D. Gathman, 11:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] Incorporate?, Graham Murray, 10:24
- RE: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Seth Goodman, 09:14
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, paddy, 07:21
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, paddy, 07:10
- Re: [spf-discuss] Incorporate?, Julian Mehnle, 06:21
- [spf-discuss] Re: Incorporate?, John A. Martin, 06:16
- Re: [spf-discuss] Incorporate?, Julian Mehnle, 06:13
September 07, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] Is SRS really necessary?, Julian Mehnle, 23:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Stuart D. Gathman, 23:39
- Re: [spf-discuss] An Open Letter to SPF Council, Julian Mehnle, 23:36
- RE: [spf-discuss] Is SRS really necessary?, Stuart D. Gathman, 23:26
- [spf-discuss] Re: New spf-webmasters mailing list, Frank Ellermann, 23:24
- Re: [spf-discuss] Incorporate?, william(at)elan.net, 23:22
- Re: [spf-discuss] New spf-webmasters mailing list, Julian Mehnle, 23:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] Incorporate?, wayne, 23:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] An Open Letter to SPF Council, wayne, 23:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Leonard Mills, 23:06
- RE: [spf-discuss] Is SRS really necessary?, gaven(_at_)gavdogg(_dot_)net, 14:01
- Re: [spf-discuss] Is SRS really necessary?, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] Is SRS really necessary?, Dennis Willson, 13:47
- [spf-discuss] Incorporate?, Jonathan Gardner, 13:43
- RE: [spf-discuss] Is SRS really necessary?, Scott Kitterman, 13:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:40
- RE: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Seth Goodman, 13:38
- [spf-discuss] Is SRS really necessary?, gaven(_at_)gavdogg(_dot_)net, 13:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, paddy, 11:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, paddy, 11:43
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, paddy, 10:42
- [spf-discuss] SPAMHAUS SAYS YAHOO MAJOR PHISHING SITE HOST, Hector Santos, 09:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, paddy, 09:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] An Open Letter to SPF Council, wayne, 08:48
- [spf-discuss] An Open Letter to SPF Council, John A. Martin, 08:20
- RE: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Seth Goodman, 07:08
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, paddy, 02:12
September 06, 2005
- [spf-discuss] Re: irc_log.html#20050907T0049, Frank Ellermann, 19:40
- Re: [spf-discuss] irc_log.html#20050907T0049, william(at)elan.net, 18:55
- [spf-discuss] Re: New spf-webmasters mailing list, Frank Ellermann, 18:34
- [spf-discuss] irc_log.html#20050907T0049, Frank Ellermann, 18:09
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Dennis Willson, 13:29
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, paddy, 13:18
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, paddy, 13:11
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Terry Fielder, 12:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:49
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, paddy, 12:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] Cat Fight! SPF Claws Sender-ID, Jeff Macdonald, 11:50
- RE: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Seth Goodman, 11:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Stuart D. Gathman, 08:43
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, paddy, 08:09
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Dick St.Peters, 07:21
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 06:37
- Re: [spf-discuss] Exclusive v. Open SPF records, Scott Kitterman, 06:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, paddy, 04:10
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 03:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, william(at)elan.net, 03:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 03:14
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, paddy, 03:10
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Raymond Neeves, 03:09
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 01:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Commerco WebMaster, 01:06
September 05, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Graham Murray, 23:03
- [spf-discuss] Re: Exclusive v. Open SPF records, Frank Ellermann, 19:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] Exclusive v. Open SPF records, Stuart D. Gathman, 19:28
- Re: [spf-discuss] Exclusive v. Open SPF records, Jasper Wallace, 16:24
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 13:23
- RE: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Seth Goodman, 12:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] Webmaster for the SPF project's website, Julian Mehnle, 10:01
- [spf-discuss] New spf-webmasters mailing list, Julian Mehnle, 09:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Julian Mehnle, 08:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:04
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Julian Mehnle, 07:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Julian Mehnle, 06:52
- [spf-discuss] spf-private, william(at)elan.net, 04:58
September 04, 2005
- [spf-discuss] Re: Question on a unified policy record approach, Frank Ellermann, 20:10
- [spf-discuss] Re: Critical Path says: they have implemented spf-classic, Frank Ellermann, 19:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 13:46
- [spf-discuss] Critical Path says: they have implemented spf-classic, wayne, 12:33
- Re: [spf-discuss] (Cat Fight!) Sender-ID claws back at SPF, Hector Santos, 12:29
- Re: [spf-discuss] (Cat Fight!) Sender-ID claws back at SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 10:54
- Re: [spf-discuss] (Cat Fight!) Sender-ID claws back at SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 10:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] (Cat Fight!) Sender-ID claws back at SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:14
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:08
- Re: [spf-discuss] (Cat Fight!) Sender-ID claws back at SPF, Julian Mehnle, 09:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] Cat Fight! SPF Claws Sender-ID, Julian Mehnle, 09:48
- Re: [spf-discuss] Exclusive v. Open SPF records, Stuart D. Gathman, 09:36
- Re: [spf-discuss] Exclusive v. Open SPF records, Stuart D. Gathman, 09:31
- Re: [spf-discuss] (Cat Fight!) Sender-ID claws back at SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:54
- Re: [spf-discuss] (Cat Fight!) Sender-ID claws back at SPF, johnp, 08:52
- Re: [spf-discuss] (Cat Fight!) Sender-ID claws back at SPF, johnp, 08:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] (Cat Fight!) Sender-ID claws back at SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:26
- [spf-discuss] (Cat Fight!) Sender-ID claws back at SPF, william(at)elan.net, 07:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] Cat Fight! SPF Claws Sender-ID, Scott Kitterman, 07:53
- [spf-discuss] SPF Mail Summary Report, spf-discuss, 06:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] Cat Fight! SPF Claws Sender-ID, Dick St.Peters, 05:12
- Re: [spf-discuss] Cat Fight! SPF Claws Sender-ID, william(at)elan.net, 04:35
- [spf-discuss] Re: Cat Fight! SPF Claws Sender-ID, Frank Ellermann, 03:26
- Re: [spf-discuss] Cat Fight! SPF Claws Sender-ID, Hector Santos, 00:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] Exclusive v. Open SPF records, Ralf Doeblitz, 00:48
- Re: [spf-discuss] Exclusive v. Open SPF records, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 00:35
September 03, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 23:58
- [spf-discuss] Re: Webmaster for the SPF project's website, Frank Ellermann, 21:39
- [spf-discuss] Re: The wizard on the SPF home page, Frank Ellermann, 21:24
- Re: [spf-discuss] Cat Fight! SPF Claws Sender-ID, wayne, 21:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Webmaster for the SPF project's website, wayne, 20:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] Politics and the Next Step, wayne, 20:48
- [spf-discuss] The wizard on the SPF home page, Gaven Henderson, 19:20
- [spf-discuss] The wizard on the SPF home page, Gaven Henderson, 19:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] Exclusive v. Open SPF records, Daniel Taylor, 18:33
- [spf-discuss] Re: Webmaster for the SPF project's website, Frank Ellermann, 18:28
- Re: [spf-discuss] Exclusive v. Open SPF records, Hector Santos, 18:27
- Re: [spf-discuss] Exclusive v. Open SPF records, Gaven Henderson, 16:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] Exclusive v. Open SPF records, Gaven Henderson, 16:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] Exclusive v. Open SPF records, Hector Santos, 16:55
- [spf-discuss] Re: Cat Fight! SPF Claws Sender-ID, Frank Ellermann, 16:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] Exclusive v. Open SPF records, Julian Mehnle, 16:31
- [spf-discuss] Re: Exclusive v. Open SPF records, Frank Ellermann, 16:30
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Cat Fight! SPF Claws Sender-ID, william(at)elan.net, 15:50
- [spf-discuss] Exclusive v. Open SPF records, Gaven Henderson, 15:34
- [spf-discuss] Re: Cat Fight! SPF Claws Sender-ID, Frank Ellermann, 15:34
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:24
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:08
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 13:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] Cat Fight! SPF Claws Sender-ID, Hector Santos, 12:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Julian Mehnle, 12:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] Cat Fight! SPF Claws Sender-ID, Julian Mehnle, 12:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 11:37
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 11:35
- [spf-discuss] Cat Fight! SPF Claws Sender-ID, Scott Kitterman, 10:57
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Julian Mehnle, 10:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] spf-project mailing list is about to be re-purposed and made public, Julian Mehnle, 07:47
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: spf-project mailing list is about to be re-purposed and made public, wayne, 07:43
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: spf-project mailing list is about to be re-purposed and made public, wayne, 06:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: spf-project mailing list is about to be re-purposed and made public, wayne, 06:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] Politics and the Next Step, Hector Santos, 06:31
September 02, 2005
- [spf-discuss] Re: spf-project mailing list is about to be re-purposed and made public, Frank Ellermann, 23:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] spf-project mailing list is about to be re-purposed and made public, Julian Mehnle, 17:11
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: spf-project mailing list is about to be re-purposed and made public, Scott Kitterman, 17:10
- [spf-discuss] Re: spf-project mailing list is about to be re-purposed and made public, Frank Ellermann, 16:56
- [spf-discuss] Re: spf-project mailing list is about to be re-purposed and made public, Julian Mehnle, 15:48
September 01, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] DomainDNS (DD) - new free DNS services that supports SPF, Scott Kitterman, 17:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] DomainDNS (DD) - new free DNS services that supports SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 16:29
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Question on a unified policy record approach, Stuart D. Gathman, 16:21
- Re: [spf-discuss] DomainDNS (DD) - new free DNS services that supports SPF, Jasper Wallace, 16:10
- [spf-discuss] Re: Question on a unified policy record approach, Frank Ellermann, 14:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] Politics and the Next Step, johnp, 14:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] Politics and the Next Step, Scott Kitterman, 14:12
- Re: [spf-discuss] DomainDNS (DD) - new free DNS services that supports SPF, Bashar, 13:43
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:31
- Re: [spf-discuss] DomainDNS (DD) - new free DNS services that supports SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:20
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, wayne, 13:20
- Re: [spf-discuss] DomainDNS (DD) - new free DNS services that supports SPF, Jasper Wallace, 13:09
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: DomainDNS (DD) - new free DNS services that supports SPF, Seth Goodman, 12:57
- [spf-discuss] Politics and the Next Step, Jonathan Gardner, 12:56
- [spf-discuss] Re: Question on a unified policy record approach, Frank Ellermann, 12:43
- [spf-discuss] Re: DomainDNS (DD) - new free DNS services that supports SPF, Frank Ellermann, 12:34
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Question on a unified policy record approach, william(at)elan.net, 12:32
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Question on a unified policy record approach, Scott Kitterman, 12:24
- [spf-discuss] Re: Question on a unified policy record approach, Frank Ellermann, 12:18
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Resent-* oddities (was: Additional appeal against publication of draft-lyon-senderid-* [...]), Seth Goodman, 11:57
- RE: [spf-discuss] News article: Could Microsoft Lose IETF Backing for Sender ID?, Seth Goodman, 11:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Scott Kitterman, 11:30
- Re[2]: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Kurt Andersen, 10:57
- RE: [spf-discuss] News article: Could Microsoft Lose IETF Backing for Sender ID?, Kelly, Michael, 10:57
- Re[2]: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Kurt Andersen, 10:54
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:40
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, wayne, 10:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, wayne, 10:32
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:26
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Resent-* oddities (was: Additional appeal against publication of draft-lyon-senderid-* [...]), Seth Goodman, 10:07
- [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach, Kurt Andersen, 09:48
- RE: [spf-discuss] News article: Could Microsoft Lose IETF Backing for Sender ID?, Seth Goodman, 09:18
- Re: [spf-discuss] DomainDNS (DD) - new free DNS services that supports SPF, Scott Kitterman, 09:16
- RE: [spf-discuss] DomainDNS (DD) - new free DNS services that supports SPF, Seth Goodman, 08:53
- [spf-discuss] Re: Resent-* oddities (was: Additional appeal against publication of draft-lyon-senderid-* [...]), Tony Finch, 06:44
- RE: [spf-discuss] News article: Could Microsoft Lose IETF Backing for Sender ID?, Kelly, Michael, 05:33
- Re: [spf-discuss] DomainDNS (DD) - new free DNS services that supports SPF, David MacQuigg, 04:30