SPF Discuss (date)
October 31, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] the SPF website domain name, Scott Kitterman, 21:06
- [spf-discuss] Re: the SPF website domain name, Frank Ellermann, 18:43
- Re: [spf-discuss] the SPF website domain name, Michael Weiner, 18:14
- Re: [spf-discuss] the SPF website domain name, william(at)elan.net, 15:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] the SPF website domain name, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 11:01
- Re: [spf-discuss] the SPF website domain name, wayne, 10:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] the SPF website domain name, Morris Inouye, 10:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Weird spf record, wayne, 10:12
- [spf-discuss] the SPF website domain name, wayne, 10:03
- Re: [spf-discuss] Weird spf record, Stuart D. Gathman, 09:57
- Re: [spf-discuss] Weird spf record, Scott Kitterman, 09:50
October 29, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Weird spf record, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 13:44
- [spf-discuss] Re: Weird spf record, Frank Ellermann, 12:28
- Re: [spf-discuss] Weird spf record, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] Weird spf record, wayne, 09:09
- Re: [spf-discuss] Weird spf record, wayne, 09:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] Weird spf record, Stuart D. Gathman, 09:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] Weird spf record, Stuart D. Gathman, 08:57
- Re: [spf-discuss] Your message to support(_at_)ebay(_dot_)com was not received (KMM193296648V92914L0KM), wayne, 08:37
- Re: [spf-discuss] Your message to support(_at_)ebay(_dot_)com was not received (KMM193296648V92914L0KM), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:27
- Re: [spf-discuss] Weird spf record, Jose Celestino, 07:04
- Re: [spf-discuss] Weird spf record, wayne, 06:44
- [spf-discuss] Your message to support(_at_)ebay(_dot_)com was not received (KMM193296648V92914L0KM), eBay Customer Support, 06:36
- [spf-discuss] Weird spf record, Jose Celestino, 06:34
October 25, 2005
- RE: [spf-discuss] Univ of Mo, etc. discouraging SPF?, Mark, 14:48
- [spf-discuss] Re: Univ of Mo, etc. discouraging SPF?, Frank Ellermann, 14:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] Univ of Mo, etc. discouraging SPF?, Daniel Taylor, 09:47
- [spf-discuss] Univ of Mo, etc. discouraging SPF?, John Dupuy, 09:33
October 21, 2005
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF Service Provider, Frank Ellermann, 13:19
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF Service Provider, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:10
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF Service Provider, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:04
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Service Provider, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:56
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF Service Provider, Herb Martin, 08:39
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF Service Provider, Dan Field, 07:10
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF Service Provider, Dan Field, 07:08
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF Service Provider, Sandipan Chowdhury, 07:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Service Provider, j o a r, 07:03
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF Service Provider, David Woodhouse, 07:01
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF Service Provider, Dan Field, 06:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Service Provider, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 06:19
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF Service Provider, Sandipan Chowdhury, 05:09
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF Service Provider, Herb Martin, 04:47
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Service Provider, Scott Kitterman, 04:28
- [spf-discuss] SPF Service Provider, Sandipan Chowdhury, 03:44
October 20, 2005
- [spf-discuss] OT: IESG bar BOF, Frank Ellermann, 23:25
- Re: [spf-discuss] IESG bar BOF (was: Wizard harmful), william(at)elan.net, 20:35
- [spf-discuss] Re: Wizard harmful, Frank Ellermann, 19:45
- [spf-discuss] IESG bar BOF (was: Wizard harmful), Frank Ellermann, 19:26
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Wizard harmful, Michael Weiner, 18:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Wizard harmful, william(at)elan.net, 18:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] Wizard harmfull, Scott Kitterman, 18:20
- [spf-discuss] Re: Wizard harmful, Frank Ellermann, 18:17
- Re: [spf-discuss] Wizard harmfull, Michael Weiner, 17:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] Wizard harmfull, Dave Oksner, 13:36
- RE: [spf-discuss] Wizard harmfull, Scott Kitterman, 13:32
- RE: [spf-discuss] Wizard harmfull, Mark Berry, 13:27
- RE: [spf-discuss] Wizard harmfull, Nick Nicholas, 10:18
- [spf-discuss] Back Scatter Decline, administrator, 08:05
- [spf-discuss] Wizard harmfull, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 07:46
October 19, 2005
- [spf-discuss] MS Exchange SP2 now available: has SenderID support, wayne, 13:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF enables fully automatic spam filter, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:18
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF enables fully automatic spam filter, Andy Bakun, 11:13
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF enables fully automatic spam filter, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF enables fully automatic spam filter, Scott Kitterman, 11:03
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF enables fully automatic spam filter, Dennis Willson, 10:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF enables fully automatic spam filter, Dennis Willson, 10:50
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF enables fully automatic spam filter, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:38
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF enables fully automatic spam filter, Dick St.Peters, 07:10
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF enables fully automatic spam filter, Jeroen Massar, 06:19
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF enables fully automatic spam filter, Stuart D. Gathman, 06:04
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF enables fully automatic spam filter, Stuart D. Gathman, 05:49
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF enables fully automatic spam filter, Stuart D. Gathman, 05:47
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF enables fully automatic spam filter, Dan Field, 03:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF enables fully automatic spam filter, Tony Finch, 03:39
October 16, 2005
- RE: [spf-discuss] Validity of macros?, Timothy DeHan, 21:14
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Validity of macros?, Timothy DeHan, 21:14
- RE: [spf-discuss] Validity of macros?, Timothy DeHan, 21:14
- RE: [spf-discuss] Validity of macros?, Timothy DeHan, 21:13
- RE: [spf-discuss] Validity of macros?, Timothy DeHan, 21:12
- [spf-discuss] Re: Validity of macros?, Frank Ellermann, 20:27
- Re: [spf-discuss] Validity of macros?, wayne, 19:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] Validity of macros?, Andreas Saurwein, 18:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] Validity of macros?, wayne, 18:27
- [spf-discuss] Validity of macros?, Andreas Saurwein, 18:03
October 11, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Ideas for future "unified" auth schemes, Greg Connor, 21:44
- [spf-discuss] Re: Ideas for future "unified" auth schemes, Frank Ellermann, 20:39
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Ideas for future "unified" auth schemes, gconnor, 12:05
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Ideas for future "unified" auth schemes, gconnor, 11:37
- [spf-discuss] Re: Ideas for future "unified" auth schemes, Frank Ellermann, 01:15
October 10, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Ideas for future "unified" auth schemes, william(at)elan.net, 22:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Ideas for future "unified" auth schemes, Greg Connor, 20:46
- RE: [spf-discuss] Virus Expert says: virus that no longer forge email breaks SPF, Mark, 13:55
- [spf-discuss] Re: Virus Expert says: virus that no longer forge email breaks SPF, Frank Ellermann, 13:08
- [spf-discuss] SPF crippled by lack of usable SRS (was Virus Expert says: virus that no longer forge email breaks SPF), Mark Jeftovic, 10:13
- [spf-discuss] Virus Expert says: virus that no longer forge email breaks SPF, wayne, 09:44
- [spf-discuss] Harry Katz says: expedia SPF record has been fixed., wayne, 09:40