SPF Discuss (thread)
[spf-discuss] "In other words, it's fairly easy to get SPF wrong. ",
Mark Holm,
2005/12/29
- Re: [spf-discuss] "In other words, it's fairly easy to get SPF wrong. ", Julian Mehnle, 2005/12/29
- Re: [spf-discuss] "In other words, it's fairly easy to get SPF wrong. ", Koen Martens, 2005/12/30
- Re: [spf-discuss] "In other words, it's fairly easy to get SPF wrong. ", Gary Faith, 2005/12/30
- Re: [spf-discuss] "In other words, it's fairly easy to get SPF wrong. ", Arjen de Korte, 2005/12/30
- Re: [spf-discuss] "In other words, it's fairly easy to get SPF wrong. ", Gary Faith, 2005/12/30
- Re: [spf-discuss] "In other words, it's fairly easy to get SPF wrong. ", Arjen de Korte, 2005/12/30
- Re: [spf-discuss] "In other words, it's fairly easy to get SPF wrong. ", Gary Faith, 2005/12/30
- Re: [spf-discuss] "In other words, it's fairly easy to get SPF wrong. ", Arjen de Korte, 2005/12/31
- Re: [spf-discuss] "In other words, it's fairly easy to get SPF wrong. ", Gary Faith, 2005/12/31
- Re: [spf-discuss] "In other words, it's fairly easy to get SPF wrong. ", Marty Godsey, 2005/12/29
[spf-discuss] Empty MX name,
Stuart D. Gathman,
2005/12/28
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/12/28
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/12/28
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, Julian Mehnle, 2005/12/29
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, Theo Schlossnagle, 2005/12/29
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, Terry Fielder, 2005/12/29
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, william(at)elan.net, 2005/12/29
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, Terry Fielder, 2005/12/29
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, william(at)elan.net, 2005/12/29
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, Terry Fielder, 2005/12/29
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, william(at)elan.net, 2005/12/29
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, Theo Schlossnagle, 2005/12/29
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/12/29
- [spf-discuss] Re: Empty MX name, John A. Martin, 2005/12/29
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Empty MX name, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/12/29
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, Tony Finch, 2005/12/29
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, wayne, 2005/12/29
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, Dick St.Peters, 2005/12/29
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, Scott Kitterman, 2005/12/30
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Bob Braden,
2005/12/09
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 2005/12/09
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Sam Hartman, 2005/12/10
- [spf-discuss] Last call IETF experiments (was: Appeal ....), Frank Ellermann, 2005/12/11
- [spf-discuss] Re: Last call IETF experiments, Frank Ellermann, 2005/12/11
- [spf-discuss] Re: Last call IETF experiments (was: Appeal ....), John C Klensin, 2005/12/11
- [spf-discuss] Re: Last call IETF experiments, Frank Ellermann, 2005/12/12
- [spf-discuss] Re: Last call IETF experiments, Sam Hartman, 2005/12/14
- [spf-discuss] Re: Last call IETF experiments, Frank Ellermann, 2005/12/14
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 2005/12/09
[spf-discuss] Re: Additional appeal against publication of draft-lyon-senderid-* in regards to its recommended use of Resent- header fields in the way that is inconsistant with RFC2822 (fwd),
william(at)elan.net,
2005/12/08
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Additional appeal against publication of draft-lyon-senderid-* in regards to its recommended use of Resent- header fields in the way that is inconsistant with RFC2822 (fwd), wayne, 2005/12/08
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Additional appeal against publication of draft-lyon-senderid-* in regards to its recommended use of Resent- header fields in the way that is inconsistant with RFC2822 (fwd), william(at)elan.net, 2005/12/08
- [spf-discuss] Outcome of the IESG appeals, Julian Mehnle, 2005/12/08
- Re: [spf-discuss] Outcome of the IESG appeals, wayne, 2005/12/08
- Re: [spf-discuss] Outcome of the IESG appeals, Julian Mehnle, 2005/12/08
- RE: [spf-discuss] Outcome of the IESG appeals, Mark, 2005/12/08
- Re: [spf-discuss] Outcome of the IESG appeals, wayne, 2005/12/08
- Re: [spf-discuss] Outcome of the IESG appeals, william(at)elan.net, 2005/12/08
- [spf-discuss] SenderID *CANNOT* become an Internet Standard, wayne, 2005/12/08
- Re: [spf-discuss] Outcome of the IESG appeals, Julian Mehnle, 2005/12/08
- [spf-discuss] Re: Outcome of the IESG appeals, Frank Ellermann, 2005/12/08
- Re: [spf-discuss] Outcome of the IESG appeals, Jeff Macdonald, 2005/12/08
- Re: [spf-discuss] Outcome of the IESG appeals, John Hinton, 2005/12/08
- [spf-discuss] Re: Outcome of the IESG appeals, Frank Ellermann, 2005/12/08
- [spf-discuss] IAB appeal (was: Outcome of the IESG appeals), Frank Ellermann, 2005/12/08
- [spf-discuss] Why is SenderID an experiement?, wayne, 2005/12/08
[spf-discuss] Fwd: Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Julian Mehnle,
2005/12/08
- RE: [spf-discuss] Fwd: Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Mark, 2005/12/08
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fwd: Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 2005/12/08
- [spf-discuss] RE: [spf-council] Fwd: Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Mark, 2005/12/08
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 2005/12/08
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Pekka Savola, 2005/12/08
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, william(at)elan.net, 2005/12/09
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 2005/12/09
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Sam Hartman, 2005/12/09
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, william(at)elan.net, 2005/12/09
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Julian Mehnle, 2005/12/09
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 2005/12/09
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Dick St.Peters, 2005/12/09
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 2005/12/09
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Julian Mehnle, 2005/12/09
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 2005/12/09
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Dick St.Peters, 2005/12/09
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, william(at)elan.net, 2005/12/09
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 2005/12/09
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 2005/12/09
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Dick St.Peters, 2005/12/09
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 2005/12/09
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 2005/12/09
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 2005/12/09
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Andrew W. Donoho, 2005/12/09
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 2005/12/09
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 2005/12/09
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Michael Elliott, 2005/12/09
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 2005/12/09
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Michael Elliott, 2005/12/09
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 2005/12/09