-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Graham Murray wrote:
This is probably a silly question, but why does the experiment have to
start when the RFC is published? Why can the RFC not document an already
running "experiment"? Publishing the RFC will have little or no impact
on the already existing SPF implementations nor on the domains which are
already publishing SPF records and/or checking SPF on incoming mail. So
why can the "results" of the already running "experiment" be counted as
well as the observations following RFC publication?
That you'll have to ask the IESG people. SPFv1 has been in use since late
2003, so the 2 years of experience required could be considered to having
been gathered as of late 2005. Yet they want to publish SPFv1 as an
Experimental RFC first and then have us collect the experience. Also,
despite explicit requests from our side, they have not provided us with a
usefully concrete description of what kind of experience data they would
like to see.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD53QCwL7PKlBZWjsRAo8lAKD1JhxwvQspLCvCuzLY/DoqxOyc3gCcCQ4N
Sp3mn7rC6JwoeTcLX/UxWxY=
=sqh5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com