On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 11:31:06AM -0500, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
<snip>
But a successful appeal will not "force PRA to use its own records".
It will only allow you to point to an experimental RFC and say
"you shouldn't be using v=spf1 records for PRA". The abuser will simply
point to Microsoft documentation and say, "this says you should
publish v=spf1 only if MFROM and PRA and the same".
Really, it actually says that? Where?
Who are they going to believe, an experimental RFC, or Microsoft
documentation?
Could we ask them to change that to a MUST instead of SHOULD for "this
says you should publish v=spf1 only if MFROM and PRA and the same".
--
:: Jeff Macdonald | Principal Engineer, Messaging Technologies
:: e-Dialog | jmacdonald(_at_)e-dialog(_dot_)com
:: 131 Hartwell Ave. | Lexington, MA 02421
:: v: 781-372-1922 | f: 781-863-8118
:: www.e-dialog.com
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com