spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Re: sid-milter

2006-02-23 03:27:43
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 11:17:23 +0100, Frank Ellermann
<nobody(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> wrote:

Beautification of C was one of my paid "hobbies" for some time,
here I'd take either...
                          (spf_result == SM_MARID_FAIL ? "SPF" : "Sender-ID"),

...just in case if somebody wants to patch it another direction
later, or I'd get rid of the "either SPF or SPF":

                          "Rejected due to SPF policy for sender %s",
                          badaddr);

Sorry, C and ABNF trigger my "hardcore nitpicking mode"... :-)
One reason why I never looked into any SPF implementation.  Bye

Oh I know my patch is ugly.  It's just a quick hack to meet my needs,
and my users will never know the difference. ;-)


-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com