SPF Discuss (thread)
[spf-discuss] Re: Why SRS really sucks,
Julian Mehnle,
2006/03/27
- [spf-discuss] SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?, Mark Jeftovic, 2006/03/27
- [spf-discuss] Re: [srs-discuss] SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?, David Woodhouse, 2006/03/27
- [spf-discuss] Re: [srs-discuss] SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2006/03/27
- [spf-discuss] Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?, Julian Mehnle, 2006/03/27
- [spf-discuss] Re: [srs-discuss] Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?, David Woodhouse, 2006/03/27
- [spf-discuss] Re: [srs-discuss] Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?, Tom Lahti, 2006/03/27
- [spf-discuss] Re: [srs-discuss] Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2006/03/28
- [spf-discuss] Re: [srs-discuss] Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?, David Woodhouse, 2006/03/28
- [spf-discuss] Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?, Julian Mehnle, 2006/03/28
- [spf-discuss] Re: [srs-discuss] Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?, David Woodhouse, 2006/03/28
- [spf-discuss] Re: [srs-discuss] SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?, David Nicol, 2006/03/27
- [spf-discuss] Re: [srs-discuss] SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?, David Woodhouse, 2006/03/27
- [spf-discuss] Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?, Julian Mehnle, 2006/03/27
- [spf-discuss] Re: [srs-discuss] Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2006/03/28
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [srs-discuss] SRS: is there a stable implementation forpostfix yet?, Hector Santos, 2006/03/28
- [spf-discuss] SPF vs. CSV (once again), Julian Mehnle, 2006/03/28
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF vs. CSV (once again), Hector Santos, 2006/03/28
RE: [spf-discuss] draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review,
Matthew.van.Eerde,
2006/03/23
- Re: [spf-discuss] draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, Kurt Andersen, 2006/03/27
- RE: [spf-discuss] draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, Matthew.van.Eerde, 2006/03/27
- RE: [spf-discuss] draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, Nick Nicholas, 2006/03/27
- RE: [spf-discuss] draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, Matthew.van.Eerde, 2006/03/27
- RE: [spf-discuss] draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, Nick Nicholas, 2006/03/27
[spf-discuss] Inconsistency in SPF spec re. "domain-spec",
Kurt Andersen,
2006/03/20
- Re: [spf-discuss] Inconsistency in SPF spec re. "domain-spec", Stuart D. Gathman, 2006/03/20
- Re: [spf-discuss] Inconsistency in SPF spec re. "domain-spec", Jeff Macdonald, 2006/03/20
- [spf-discuss] Re: Inconsistency in SPF spec re. "domain-spec", william(at)elan.net, 2006/03/20
- [spf-discuss] Re: Inconsistency in SPF spec re. "domain-spec", Frank Ellermann, 2006/03/23
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Inconsistency in SPF spec re. "domain-spec", william(at)elan.net, 2006/03/23
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Inconsistency in SPF spec re. "domain-spec", Kurt Andersen, 2006/03/23
- [spf-discuss] Re: Inconsistency in SPF spec re. "domain-spec", Frank Ellermann, 2006/03/25
- Re: [spf-discuss] Inconsistency in SPF spec re. "domain-spec", Julian Mehnle, 2006/03/23
- [spf-discuss] Re: Inconsistency in SPF spec re. "domain-spec", Frank Ellermann, 2006/03/25
- Re: [spf-discuss] Inconsistency in SPF spec re. "domain-spec", Julian Mehnle, 2006/03/25
[spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?,
Julian Mehnle,
2006/03/10
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2006/03/10
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Scott Kitterman, 2006/03/10
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2006/03/10
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Scott Kitterman, 2006/03/10
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Julian Mehnle, 2006/03/11
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Constantine A. Murenin, 2006/03/13
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2006/03/13
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Julian Mehnle, 2006/03/11
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2006/03/11
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Julian Mehnle, 2006/03/11
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Frank Ellermann, 2006/03/12
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Scott Kitterman, 2006/03/10
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Frank Ellermann, 2006/03/10
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, william(at)elan.net, 2006/03/11
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Scott Kitterman, 2006/03/11
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Scott Kitterman, 2006/03/11
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: IAB Response to the Appeal from Julian Mehnle,
Scott Kitterman,
2006/03/05
- [spf-discuss] Re: IAB Response to the Appeal from Julian Mehnle, Frank Ellermann, 2006/03/06
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: IAB Response to the Appeal from Julian Mehnle, Scott Kitterman, 2006/03/06
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: IAB Response to the Appeal from Julian Mehnle, Daniel Taylor, 2006/03/07
- Re: [spf-discuss] IAB Response to the Appeal from Julian Mehnle, Julian Mehnle, 2006/03/07
- Re: [spf-discuss] IAB Response to the Appeal from Julian Mehnle, Constantine A. Murenin, 2006/03/07
- [spf-discuss] PGP was: (IAB Response to the Appeal from Julian Mehnle), Scott Kitterman, 2006/03/08
- Re: [spf-discuss] PGP, Julian Mehnle, 2006/03/08
- Re: [spf-discuss] PGP, Scott Kitterman, 2006/03/08
- Re: [spf-discuss] PGP, Julian Mehnle, 2006/03/08
- Re: [spf-discuss] PGP, Jeroen Massar, 2006/03/08
- Re: [spf-discuss] PGP, Julian Mehnle, 2006/03/08
- [spf-discuss] Re: PGP was: (IAB Response to the Appeal from Julian Mehnle), John A. Martin, 2006/03/08
[spf-discuss] Re: other modifiers,
Frank Ellermann,
2006/02/28
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: other modifiers, Scott Kitterman, 2006/03/10
- Re: [spf-discuss] other modifiers, Julian Mehnle, 2006/03/10
- [spf-discuss] Re: other modifiers, Frank Ellermann, 2006/03/10
- Evolutionary site change - was (Re: [spf-discuss] Re: other modifiers), Scott Kitterman, 2006/03/10
- Re: Evolutionary site change - was (Re: [spf-discuss] Re: other modifiers), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2006/03/10
- Re: Evolutionary site change - was (Re: [spf-discuss] Re: other modifiers), Scott Kitterman, 2006/03/10
- [spf-discuss] Re: Evolutionary site change, Frank Ellermann, 2006/03/10
- [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-webmasters] Re: Evolutionary site change, Scott Kitterman, 2006/03/10
- [spf-discuss] Re: Evolutionary site change, Frank Ellermann, 2006/03/11
- [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-webmasters] Re: Evolutionary site change, Scott Kitterman, 2006/03/11
- [spf-discuss] Evolutionary site change - FAQ is ready to go too, Scott Kitterman, 2006/03/11
- [spf-discuss] Re: Evolutionary site change - FAQ is ready to go too, Frank Ellermann, 2006/03/13
- [spf-discuss] Re: Evolutionary site change, Julian Mehnle, 2006/03/11
- [spf-discuss] Re: Evolutionary site change, Frank Ellermann, 2006/03/12
- [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-webmasters] Re: Evolutionary site change, Casey Allen Shobe, 2006/03/13
- [spf-discuss] Re: Evolutionary site change, Frank Ellermann, 2006/03/23
[spf-discuss] AUTH48,
Frank Ellermann,
2006/02/28
- Re: [spf-discuss] AUTH48, Julian Mehnle, 2006/03/01
- Message not available
- Message not available
- [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, Julian Mehnle, 2006/03/17
- Re: [spf-discuss] draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, Julian Mehnle, 2006/03/23
- Re: [spf-discuss] draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, william(at)elan.net, 2006/03/24
- [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, Frank Ellermann, 2006/03/25
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, william(at)elan.net, 2006/03/25
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2006/03/25
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, Stuart D. Gathman, 2006/03/25
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, william(at)elan.net, 2006/03/25
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, william(at)elan.net, 2006/03/25
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, william(at)elan.net, 2006/03/25
- [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, Frank Ellermann, 2006/03/25
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, geoffj, 2006/03/25
- [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, John A. Martin, 2006/03/25
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, william(at)elan.net, 2006/03/25
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, geoffj, 2006/03/25
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, william(at)elan.net, 2006/03/26
- [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, Julian Mehnle, 2006/03/27
- [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, John A. Martin, 2006/03/28
- [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review -- Final list of changes for review, Julian Mehnle, 2006/03/28
- Re: [spf-discuss] AUTH48, Scott Kitterman, 2006/03/01
- Re: [spf-discuss] AUTH48, Constantine A. Murenin, 2006/03/01
- Re: [spf-discuss] AUTH48, Constantine A. Murenin, 2006/03/01
- [spf-discuss] Re: AUTH48, Frank Ellermann, 2006/03/01
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: AUTH48, Scott Kitterman, 2006/03/01
- [spf-discuss] Re: AUTH48, Frank Ellermann, 2006/03/01
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: AUTH48, Constantine A. Murenin, 2006/03/02