SPF Discuss (date)
June 28, 2006
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Interesting bug reported in libspf-1.0, Scott Kitterman, 13:50
- [spf-discuss] Re: Interesting bug reported in libspf-1.0, Kurt Andersen, 13:37
- Re: [spf-discuss] Interesting bug reported in libspf-1.0, Stuart D. Gathman, 08:49
- [spf-discuss] Contact form "Other" topic submissions now go to the RT, Julian Mehnle, 07:16
- [spf-discuss] Re: Contact page requests going to SPF-discuss, Julian Mehnle, 07:16
June 26, 2006
- [spf-discuss] Interesting bug reported in libspf-1.0, Kurt Andersen, 15:22
- [spf-discuss] Re[2]: Contact page requests going to SPF-discuss, Kurt Andersen, 13:30
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF vs DomainKeys., wayne, 12:27
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF vs DomainKeys., Stuart D. Gathman, 12:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF vs DomainKeys., Bernd Petrovitsch, 00:58
June 25, 2006
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF vs DomainKeys., Stuart D. Gathman, 20:38
- [spf-discuss] Re: Contact page requests going to SPF-discuss, John A. Martin, 15:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Contact page requests going to SPF-discuss, Scott Kitterman, 14:01
- [spf-discuss] Re: Contact page requests going to SPF-discuss, Julian Mehnle, 13:31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Contact page requests going to SPF-discuss, Koen Martens, 12:33
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Contact page requests going to SPF-discuss, Scott Kitterman, 11:16
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Contact page requests going to SPF-discuss, wayne, 07:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Contact page requests going to SPF-discuss, wayne, 07:11
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF vs DomainKeys., wayne, 07:08
- [spf-discuss] SPF vs DomainKeys., Rear Gunner, 06:54
- [spf-discuss] Re: Contact page requests going to SPF-discuss, Julian Mehnle, 05:23
- [spf-discuss] Re: Contact page requests going to SPF-discuss, Julian Mehnle, 05:21
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Contact page requests going to SPF-discuss, Koen Martens, 02:58
June 24, 2006
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Contact page requests going to SPF-discuss, Scott Kitterman, 18:43
- [spf-discuss] Re: Contact page requests going to SPF-discuss, Julian Mehnle, 18:00
- Re: [spf-discuss] Contact page requests going to SPF-discuss, Koen Martens, 16:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Fwd: Blackmail?, Koen Martens, 16:39
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fwd: Blackmail?, Koen Martens, 16:36
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Microsoft plagiarism, wayne, 13:23
- [spf-discuss] Re: Microsoft plagiarism, Julian Mehnle, 12:14
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Microsoft plagiarism, wayne, 10:43
- [spf-discuss] Re: Microsoft plagiarism, Julian Mehnle, 08:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] help patching postfix srpm, Scott Kitterman, 07:14
- Re: [spf-discuss] Microsoft plagiarism, wayne, 05:53
- [spf-discuss] Microsoft plagiarism (was: Recent stats on adoption rates?), Julian Mehnle, 02:52
June 22, 2006
- Re: [spf-discuss] NEUTRAL vs NONE for HELO, Scott Kitterman, 16:56
- [spf-discuss] SPF Article on LWN, Scott Kitterman, 16:49
- [spf-discuss] Re: Contact page requests going to SPF-discuss, Julian Mehnle, 12:53
- [spf-discuss] OT: deliberately going against standards, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 12:20
- RE: [spf-discuss] Recent stats on adoption rates?, Steven Dorst, 11:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: NEUTRAL vs NONE for HELO, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Contact page requests going to SPF-discuss, Terry Fielder, 11:15
- [spf-discuss] Re: Recent stats on adoption rates?, Julian Mehnle, 11:12
- Re: [spf-discuss] Recent stats on adoption rates?, wayne, 10:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Contact page requests going to SPF-discuss, wayne, 10:52
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: NEUTRAL vs NONE for HELO, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 10:47
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: NEUTRAL vs NONE for HELO, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:05
- [spf-discuss] Recent stats on adoption rates?, Dotzero, 07:57
- Re: [spf-discuss] NEUTRAL vs NONE for HELO, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 04:27
- [spf-discuss] Re: Contact page requests going to SPF-discuss, Julian Mehnle, 02:23
- [spf-discuss] Re: Bug in Gmane forum interface, Julian Mehnle, 02:10
- [spf-discuss] Re: NEUTRAL vs NONE for HELO, Julian Mehnle, 01:59
June 21, 2006
- Re: [spf-discuss] NEUTRAL vs NONE for HELO, wayne, 19:47
- [spf-discuss] Contact page requests going to SPF-discuss, wayne, 19:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] NEUTRAL vs NONE for HELO, Scott Kitterman, 19:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] NEUTRAL vs NONE for HELO, wayne, 18:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] NEUTRAL vs NONE for HELO, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 18:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] NEUTRAL vs NONE for HELO, Scott Kitterman, 17:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] NEUTRAL vs NONE for HELO, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 17:29
- Re: [spf-discuss] NEUTRAL vs NONE for HELO, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:37
- Re: [spf-discuss] NEUTRAL vs NONE for HELO, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 14:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] NEUTRAL vs NONE for HELO, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:26
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bug in Gmane forum interface, Mark Wolk, 14:05
- Re: [spf-discuss] NEUTRAL vs NONE for HELO, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 13:21
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bug in Gmane forum interface, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:14
- [spf-discuss] Re: NEUTRAL vs NONE for HELO, Julian Mehnle, 13:12
- [spf-discuss] NEUTRAL vs NONE for HELO, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:05
- [spf-discuss] spf related domain names expiring, wayne, 07:26
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bug in Gmane forum interface, wayne, 07:13
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Bug in Gmane forum interface, Scott Kitterman, 06:43
- [spf-discuss] Re: Bug in Gmane forum interface, Julian Mehnle, 06:40
- [spf-discuss] Re: Bug in Gmane forum interface, John A. Martin, 05:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bug in Gmane forum interface, Scott Kitterman, 04:51
- [spf-discuss] Bug in Gmane forum interface, Mark Wolk, 02:57
- [spf-discuss] SPF Supported Software, Martyn Keen, 02:56
June 17, 2006
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: When receiving mail servers undermine the purpose of SPF - a domain owners perspective, Claire Campbell, 10:53
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: When receiving mail servers undermine the purpose of SPF - a domain owners perspective, Scott Kitterman, 09:45
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: When receiving mail servers undermine the purpose of SPF - a domain owners perspective, Mark Holm, 09:36
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Fwd: Blackmail?, Scott Kitterman, 08:16
- [spf-discuss] Re: Fwd: Blackmail?, John A. Martin, 07:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fwd: Blackmail?, Michael Breton, 06:48
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Fwd: Blackmail?, Scott Kitterman, 06:43
- [spf-discuss] Re: Fwd: Blackmail?, John A. Martin, 06:35
- [spf-discuss] Fwd: Blackmail?, Julian Mehnle, 03:15
June 13, 2006
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: When receiving mail servers undermine the purpose of SPF - a domain owners perspective, Claire Campbell, 19:21
- RE: [spf-discuss] When receiving mail servers undermine the purpose of SPF - a domain owners perspective, Claire Campbell, 17:24
- [spf-discuss] Re: When receiving mail servers undermine the purpose of SPF - a domain owners perspective, Julian Mehnle, 15:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] When receiving mail servers undermine the purpose of SPF - a domain owners perspective, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:12
- [spf-discuss] When receiving mail servers undermine the purpose of SPF - a domain owners perspective, Claire Campbell, 12:06
June 10, 2006
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fwd: I am not spam! OK, so i am not much better. :(, wayne, 12:22
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: DNS record caching the microsoft way, wayne, 12:12
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: DNS record caching the microsoft way, william(at)elan.net, 12:00
- [spf-discuss] Re: DNS record caching the microsoft way, Julian Mehnle, 11:30
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fwd: I am not spam! OK, so i am not much better. :(, John Hinton, 11:24
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: DNS record caching the microsoft way, wayne, 09:44
- [spf-discuss] Re: DNS record caching the microsoft way, Julian Mehnle, 07:52
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fwd: I am not spam! OK, so i am not much better. :(, Scott Kitterman, 07:09
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: DNS record caching the microsoft way, wayne, 06:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fwd: I am not spam! OK, so i am not much better. :(, paddy, 04:04
- [spf-discuss] Re: DNS record caching the microsoft way, Julian Mehnle, 03:40
- [spf-discuss] DNS record caching the microsoft way, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 02:55
June 09, 2006
- [spf-discuss] Test suite: collecting test cases, Julian Mehnle, 21:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fwd: RFC 4408 violates RFC 2821 spec, wayne, 18:40
- [spf-discuss] Fwd: RFC 4408 violates RFC 2821 spec, Julian Mehnle, 18:29
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: RFC 4408 erratas, william(at)elan.net, 17:30
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: RFC 4408 erratas, Scott Kitterman, 17:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: RFC 4408 erratas, wayne, 16:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] Users mistaking the SPF project for well-known (to them) ISPs (Fwd: Huh?), Dennis Willson, 15:34
- RE: [spf-discuss] Fwd: I am not spam! OK, so i am not much better. :(, Matthew.van.Eerde, 15:09
- [spf-discuss] Fwd: I am not spam! OK, so i am not much better. :(, Julian Mehnle, 12:42
- RE: [spf-discuss] Users mistaking the SPF project for well-known (to them) ISPs (Fwd: Huh?), Matthew.van.Eerde, 09:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Users mistaking the SPF project for well-known (to them) ISPs (Fwd: Huh?), Scott Kitterman, 07:10
- [spf-discuss] Re: Users mistaking the SPF project for well-known (to them) ISPs (Fwd: Huh?), Julian Mehnle, 06:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] Users mistaking the SPF project for well-known (to them) ISPs (Fwd: Huh?), Dotzero, 06:39
- Re: [spf-discuss] Users mistaking the SPF project for well-known (to them) ISPs (Fwd: Huh?), Scott Kitterman, 05:00
- Re: [spf-discuss] Users mistaking the SPF project for well-known (to them) ISPs (Fwd: Huh?), Arjen de Korte, 04:18
- Re: [spf-discuss] Users mistaking the SPF project for well-known (to them) ISPs (Fwd: Huh?), Scott Kitterman, 04:11
- Re: [spf-discuss] Users mistaking the SPF project for well-known (to them) ISPs (Fwd: Huh?), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 04:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] Users mistaking the SPF project for well-known (to them) ISPs (Fwd: Huh?), Arjen de Korte, 03:54
- Re: [spf-discuss] Users mistaking the SPF project for well-known (to them) ISPs (Fwd: Huh?), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 03:45
- [spf-discuss] Users mistaking the SPF project for well-known (to them) ISPs (Fwd: Huh?), Julian Mehnle, 03:31
June 08, 2006
- Re: [spf-discuss] How can one alert domain admins of broken spf records, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 13:25
- Re: [spf-discuss] How can one alert domain admins of broken spf records, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:05
- Re: [spf-discuss] How can one alert domain admins of broken spf records, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:52
- Re: [spf-discuss] How can one alert domain admins of broken spf records, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF implementation for web page, no direct replies, 09:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] How can one alert domain admins of broken spf records, Scott Kitterman, 09:01
- Re: [spf-discuss] How can one alert domain admins of broken spf records, Scott Kitterman, 08:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] How can one alert domain admins of broken spf records, Arjen de Korte, 08:29
- Re: [spf-discuss] How can one alert domain admins of broken spf records, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 07:48
- Re: [spf-discuss] How can one alert domain admins of broken spf records, Scott Kitterman, 07:47
- Re: [spf-discuss] How can one alert domain admins of broken spf records, Scott Kitterman, 07:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] How can one alert domain admins of broken spf records, Scott Kitterman, 07:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] How can one alert domain admins of broken spf records, Stuart D. Gathman, 07:30
- Re: [spf-discuss] How can one alert domain admins of broken spf records, Arjen de Korte, 07:25
- Re: [spf-discuss] How can one alert domain admins of broken spf records, Stuart D. Gathman, 07:17
- Re: [spf-discuss] How can one alert domain admins of broken spf records, Ramprasad, 06:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] How can one alert domain admins of broken spf records, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 05:48
- Re: [spf-discuss] How can one alert domain admins of broken spf records, Scott Kitterman, 05:41
- [spf-discuss] How can one alert domain admins of broken spf records, Ramprasad, 05:33
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF implementation for web page, Koen Martens, 02:44
June 07, 2006
- RE: [spf-discuss] Nice but..., Matthew.van.Eerde, 16:18
- Re: [spf-discuss] Nice but..., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 16:08
- [spf-discuss] SPF implementation for web page, no direct replies, 15:54
- Re: [spf-discuss] Introducing..., Scott Kitterman, 13:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] Introducing..., Graham Beneke, 13:49
- RE: [spf-discuss] Nice but..., blues, 13:43
- [spf-discuss] Introducing..., Koen Martens, 13:37
- Re: [spf-discuss] Nice but..., Koen Martens, 13:28
- Re: [spf-discuss] Nice but..., Koen Martens, 13:27
- Re: [spf-discuss] Nice but..., Scott Kitterman, 10:27
- RE: [spf-discuss] Nice but..., Matthew.van.Eerde, 10:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] Nice but..., Scott Kitterman, 09:57
- RE: [spf-discuss] Nice but..., Stuart D. Gathman, 09:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] Nice but..., Stuart D. Gathman, 09:37
- RE: [spf-discuss] Nice but..., blues, 09:19
- FW: [spf-discuss] Re: Nice but... (Fwd: Response to Matthew), Matthew.van.Eerde, 08:26
- [spf-discuss] Re: Nice but... (Fwd: Response to Matthew), Julian Mehnle, 02:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] Nice but..., Koen Martens, 00:38
June 06, 2006
- [spf-discuss] Re: Nice but..., Julian Mehnle, 15:13
- [spf-discuss] Re[2]: Interesting usage observation, Kurt Andersen, 15:09
- Re: [spf-discuss] Interesting usage observation, william(at)elan.net, 14:30
- RE: [spf-discuss] Nice but..., Matthew.van.Eerde, 14:24
- [spf-discuss] Nice but..., Junior, 14:16
- [spf-discuss] Interesting usage observation, Kurt Andersen, 13:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Feedback, Terry Fielder, 05:33
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF Feedback, Julian Mehnle, 00:20