SPF Discuss (thread)
[spf-discuss] [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)],
Frank Ellermann,
2006/10/30
- Re: [spf-discuss] [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], william(at)elan.net, 2006/10/30
- [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], Frank Ellermann, 2006/10/30
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], wayne, 2006/10/30
- [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], Frank Ellermann, 2006/10/31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], Stuart D. Gathman, 2006/10/31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2006/10/31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], Stuart D. Gathman, 2006/10/31
- [spf-discuss] Processing limits (was: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)), Julian Mehnle, 2006/10/31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Processing limits (was: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2006/10/31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], wayne, 2006/10/31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2006/10/31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], Stuart D. Gathman, 2006/10/31
- [spf-discuss] What should be the result of exceeding optional process limits?, wayne, 2006/10/31
- [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], Frank Ellermann, 2006/10/31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], Scott Kitterman, 2006/10/31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], wayne, 2006/10/31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], wayne, 2006/10/31
- [spf-discuss] Re: Processing limits (was: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)), Julian Mehnle, 2006/10/31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Processing limits (was: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)), wayne, 2006/10/31
- [spf-discuss] Re: Processing limits, Julian Mehnle, 2006/10/31
- [spf-discuss] draft-otis-spf-dos-exploit (was: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)), Julian Mehnle, 2006/10/31
[spf-discuss] MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise,
Scott Kitterman,
2006/10/23
- Re: [spf-discuss] MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, william(at)elan.net, 2006/10/23
- Re: [spf-discuss] MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2006/10/23
- [spf-discuss] Re: MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Julian Mehnle, 2006/10/23
- [spf-discuss] Re: MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Julian Mehnle, 2006/10/23
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2006/10/23
- Re: [spf-discuss] MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, william(at)elan.net, 2006/10/23
- [spf-discuss] Re: MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Frank Ellermann, 2006/10/23
- Re: [spf-discuss] MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Jeff Macdonald, 2006/10/30
- Re: [spf-discuss] MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, william(at)elan.net, 2006/10/30
- Re: [spf-discuss] MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2006/10/30
- [spf-discuss] Re: MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Frank Ellermann, 2006/10/30
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Jeff Macdonald, 2006/10/31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Devin Ganger, 2006/10/31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Scott Kitterman, 2006/10/31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Devin Ganger, 2006/10/31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Scott Kitterman, 2006/10/31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Devin Ganger, 2006/10/31
- [spf-discuss] Re: MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Frank Ellermann, 2006/10/31
- Re: [spf-discuss] MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, william(at)elan.net, 2006/10/23
- Re: [spf-discuss] MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, wayne, 2006/10/23
[spf-discuss] Cities with SPF-equipped domains?,
Julian Mehnle,
2006/10/19
- Re: [spf-discuss] Cities with SPF-equipped domains?, Michael Breton, 2006/10/19
- Re: [spf-discuss] Cities with SPF-equipped domains?, Larry Smith, 2006/10/19
- Re: [spf-discuss] Cities with SPF-equipped domains?, Mike, 2006/10/19
- [spf-discuss] Re: Cities with SPF-equipped domains?, Julian Mehnle, 2006/10/19
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Cities with SPF-equipped domains?, Patrick Oonk, 2006/10/19
- [spf-discuss] Re: Cities with SPF-equipped domains?, Julian Mehnle, 2006/10/19
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Cities with SPF-equipped domains?, Larry Smith, 2006/10/19
- [spf-discuss] Re: Cities with SPF-equipped domains?, Julian Mehnle, 2006/10/19
- Re: [spf-discuss] Cities with SPF-equipped domains?, Ralf Doeblitz, 2006/10/20
- Re: [spf-discuss] Cities with SPF-equipped domains?, Michael Breton, 2006/10/20
- Re: [spf-discuss] Cities with SPF-equipped domains?, Michael Breton, 2006/10/20
[spf-discuss] should SPF checks be before or after RBL,
Ramprasad,
2006/10/03
- Re: [spf-discuss] should SPF checks be before or after RBL, Scott Kitterman, 2006/10/03
- Re: [spf-discuss] should SPF checks be before or after RBL, Daniel Wiberg, 2006/10/03
- Re: [spf-discuss] should SPF checks be before or after RBL, Ramprasad, 2006/10/03
- Re: [spf-discuss] should SPF checks be before or after RBL, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2006/10/03
- Re: [spf-discuss] should SPF checks be before or after RBL, william(at)elan.net, 2006/10/03
- Re: [spf-discuss] should SPF checks be before or after RBL, Scott Kitterman, 2006/10/03
- Re: [spf-discuss] should SPF checks be before or after RBL, John Hinton, 2006/10/03
- Re: [spf-discuss] should SPF checks be before or after RBL, Daniel Wiberg, 2006/10/03
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Error in RFC4408: URL encoding,
wayne,
2006/10/01
- [spf-discuss] Re: Error in RFC4408: URL encoding, Frank Ellermann, 2006/10/01
- [spf-discuss] Re: Error in RFC4408: URL encoding, Julian Mehnle, 2006/10/01
- [spf-discuss] Re: Error in RFC4408: URL encoding, Frank Ellermann, 2006/10/01
- [spf-discuss] Re: Error in RFC4408: URL encoding, Julian Mehnle, 2006/10/02
- [spf-discuss] Re: Error in RFC4408: URL encoding, Frank Ellermann, 2006/10/05
- [spf-discuss] Compiling a list of errata for RFC 4408 (was: Error in RFC4408: URL encoding), Julian Mehnle, 2006/10/06
- [spf-discuss] Re: Compiling a list of errata for RFC 4408, Frank Ellermann, 2006/10/06
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Compiling a list of errata for RFC 4408, Terry Fielder, 2006/10/06
- [spf-discuss] Re: Compiling a list of errata for RFC 4408, Julian Mehnle, 2006/10/07
- [spf-discuss] Re: Compiling a list of errata for RFC 4408, Frank Ellermann, 2006/10/07
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Compiling a list of errata for RFC 4408, Scott Kitterman, 2006/10/07
- [spf-discuss] Re: Compiling a list of errata for RFC 4408, Julian Mehnle, 2006/10/07