-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
I am not saying draft-mengwong-spf-00 is gospel which we should follow.
I am saying your argumentation is flawed.
Oops, you're right. I have no idea why I was looking at the "exists"
About "exp", _all_ drafts said:
| explanation = "exp" "=" domain-spec
So it probably can even be said that the fact that domain-spec could be
empty was considered a bug starting with draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00,
which required it to end in a non-empty domain-end.
And finally, here's an analogy: Should "v=spf1 exp=-all" (essentially a
missing space) be considered a Neutral instead of a PermError?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735