-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Frank Ellermann wrote:
Yes, a combined SPF+PRA implementation is forced to violate either the
RECOMMENDATION in RFC 4408, or the SHOULD in 4406. If they study the
IESG note and hopefully also the appeal(s) they'll do the right thing,
I vaguely recall that one combo implementation in fact follows RFC 4408,
but I've no good idea how to search for the source (here or in "help").
For the record, Mail::SPF is such a combo implementation that resolves the
conflict in favor of RFC 4408.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735