-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Scott Kitterman wrote:
That is correct. This is not even a 'violation' of the RFC as RFC
4408 has explicit allowance for addition of unknown modifiers later.
However, modifiers aren't allowed to change the SPF result, [...]
Where do you take that from?
I agree however that modifiers changing the SPF result is generally a bad
idea from a design perspective. Given that the "redirect=" _modifier_
really should have been a "redirect:" _mechanism_, this concept isn't
being violated all that badly...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735