SPF Discuss (date)

July 31, 2008

Re[2]: [spf-discuss] Obivous forged email reply with bad SPF info... Here is a header..., Sanford Whiteman, 22:27
Re[3]: [spf-discuss] Obivous forged email reply with bad SPF info... Here is a header..., Sanford Whiteman, 22:22
Re[2]: [spf-discuss] Obivous forged email reply with bad SPF info... Here is a header..., Boyd Lynn Gerber, 21:45
Re[2]: [spf-discuss] Obivous forged email reply with bad SPF info... Here is a header..., Sanford Whiteman, 20:23
Re: [spf-discuss] Obivous forged email reply with bad SPF info... Here is a header..., Scott Kitterman, 19:48
Re: [spf-discuss] Obivous forged email reply with bad SPF info... Here is a header..., Boyd Lynn Gerber, 19:42
[spf-discuss] Re: Obivous forged email reply with bad SPF info... Here is a header..., Frank Ellermann, 17:37
[spf-discuss] Re: Email messages that are extremely un helpful..., Frank Ellermann, 17:08
Re: [spf-discuss] Obivous forged email reply with bad SPF info... Here is a header..., Boyd Lynn Gerber, 17:00
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Email messages that are extremely un helpful..., Scott Kitterman, 16:39
Re: [spf-discuss] Obivous forged email reply with bad SPF info... Here is a header..., Stuart D. Gathman, 16:04
[spf-discuss] Obivous forged email reply with bad SPF info... Here is a header..., Boyd Lynn Gerber, 15:30
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Email messages that are extremely un helpful..., Boyd Lynn Gerber, 13:44
[spf-discuss] CNAME (was: Re: Email messages that are extremely un helpful...), Frank Ellermann, 13:41
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Email messages that are extremely un helpful..., Claire Campbell, 13:18
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Email messages that are extremely un helpful..., Boyd Lynn Gerber, 12:53
RE: [spf-discuss] Email messages that are extremely un helpful..., Devin Ganger, 12:38
[spf-discuss] Re: Email messages that are extremely un helpful..., Frank Ellermann, 12:10
Re: [spf-discuss] Email messages that are extremely un helpful..., Scott Kitterman, 10:06
Re: [spf-discuss] Email messages that are extremely un helpful..., Boyd Lynn Gerber, 09:57
Re: [spf-discuss] Email messages that are extremely un helpful..., Scott Kitterman, 09:43
[spf-discuss] Email messages that are extremely un helpful..., Boyd Lynn Gerber, 09:07

July 28, 2008

Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF-EAI, Alessandro Vesely, 04:11

July 27, 2008

[spf-discuss] Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (subject trimmed), Frank Ellermann, 10:18
Re: [spf-discuss] Fwd: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 08:00
[spf-discuss] Fwd: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed Standard, Frank Ellermann, 07:48
[spf-discuss] Re: SPF-EAI, Frank Ellermann, 07:38
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF-EAI, Alessandro Vesely, 01:41

July 26, 2008

[spf-discuss] SPF Mail Summary Report, spf-discuss, 22:04
[spf-discuss] Re: SPF-EAI (was: Re: 99.95% of all SPF records use no macros), Frank Ellermann, 16:51
Re: [spf-discuss] SPF-EAI (was: Re: 99.95% of all SPF records use no macros), Alessandro Vesely, 09:50

July 25, 2008

[spf-discuss] Re: 99.95% of all SPF records use no macros, Frank Ellermann, 06:24
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: 99.95% of all SPF records use no macros, Alessandro Vesely, 00:15

July 24, 2008

[spf-discuss] Re: 99.95% of all SPF records use no macros, Stuart D. Gathman, 19:46
[spf-discuss] Re: 99.95% of all SPF records use no macros, Frank Ellermann, 15:58
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: 99.95% of all SPF records use no macros, Scott Kitterman, 14:33
[spf-discuss] Re: 99.95% of all SPF records use no macros, Frank Ellermann, 14:03
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: 99.95% of all SPF records use no macros, Scott Kitterman, 09:26
[spf-discuss] Re: 99.95% of all SPF records use no macros, Frank Ellermann, 00:51

July 23, 2008

Re: [spf-discuss] Re: 99.95% of all SPF records use no macros, Philip Gladstone, 18:19
[spf-discuss] RE: [spf-help] DomainKey and SPF, Scott Kitterman, 13:31
[spf-discuss] Re: 99.95% of all SPF records use no macros, Frank Ellermann, 12:53
Re: [spf-discuss] 99.95% of all SPF records use no macros, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:52
[spf-discuss] 99.95% of all SPF records use no macros, Frank Ellermann, 10:29

July 20, 2008

[spf-discuss] Re: SPF and Google Groups (sending on behalf of), Frank Ellermann, 10:03
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Re: SPF and Google Groups (sending on behalf of), Scott Kitterman, 09:26
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Re: SPF and Google Groups (sending on behalf of), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:53
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Re: SPF and Google Groups (sending on behalf of), Scott Kitterman, 08:36
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Re: SPF and Google Groups (sending on behalf of), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:21
[spf-discuss] Re: Re: SPF and Google Groups (sending on behalf of), Frank Ellermann, 07:52

July 19, 2008

[spf-discuss] SPF Mail Summary Report, spf-discuss, 22:04

July 14, 2008

Re: [spf-discuss] Help of SPF Implementations on exim, Peter Bowyer, 22:26
[spf-discuss] Help of SPF Implementations on exim, SODATONOU Dodji Comlan Samuel, 12:32
[spf-discuss] SPF EAI -01, Frank Ellermann, 12:24

July 10, 2008

[spf-discuss] Re: spf and gmail, Frank Ellermann, 09:05

July 07, 2008

[spf-discuss] Re: FYI: 2821bis examples, Frank Ellermann, 20:43
Re: [spf-discuss] FYI: 2821bis examples, Scott Kitterman, 19:57
[spf-discuss] FYI: 2821bis examples, Frank Ellermann, 19:33

July 05, 2008

[spf-discuss] SPF Mail Summary Report, spf-discuss, 22:03