I wrote:
bryan wrote:
I was wondering if anyone had looked at fxt
http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~aberlea/Fxt/userGuide.html#fxt_actio
ns and if they had any comments, to me it seemed like no improvement on
xslt. Does anyone see something it does better, or stuff it does which
might be better used in xslt 2.0?
A quick look at that spec says there's almost nothing it does that XSLT
can't do (except, perhaps, its use of a stack). There are lots of
things XSLT can do that FXT can't, especially XSLT/XPath 2.0.
Perhaps I was too hasty. It does seem to ignore namespaces. Maybe that's a
plus.
--
--------------------------
Jeff Kenton
DataPower Technology, Inc.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list