I can understand dp's point, when reading section 14
http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#grouping of the spec it does give the
impression that @group-by removes duplicates (instead of accessing them
through current-group()).
If I was Mike (which I'm not;-) I wouldn't know which bit to change
given this comment.
I just read that section and it says (in the third para)
Each item in the population is assigned to exactly one group: the
assignment of items to groups depends on the group-by, group-adjacent,
group-starting-with, and group-ending-with attributes.
This seems to me to be fairly explicit that each item ends up in exactly
one group, so in particular no items are removed, but section 14 is a
fairly long section so perhaps it's less clear later on?
David
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list