From: Scott(_dot_)Trenda(_at_)oati(_dot_)net
Are there any XSLT 2.0 processors that are implemented at the COM level?
I guess I could easily add a COM wrapper to Gestalt, using EiffelCOM.
But why would you want such a thing? COM is awful even by Microsoft's
"standards"
- so much so that they invented .NET to hide it.
I would have thought that if you have to use Microsoft (because your boss says
so), then using Saxon.NET
would be a sensible option.
_________________________________________________________________
The next generation of MSN Hotmail has arrived - Windows Live Hotmail
http://www.newhotmail.co.uk
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--