On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 16:37:09 +0100
David Carlisle <davidc(_at_)nag(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk> wrote:
On 06/08/2010 12:31, Dave Pawson wrote:
If implementations did what the casual reader might assume
I wouldn't have to Andrew?
The spec, read today, with xml:id existent, is misleading.
xml:id isn't related to generate-id is it?
It is the 'todays' version of id, as used in XML.
Hence in my view generate-id() function should generate an id value
as defined in XML rec.
so yes, in my view, it is related David.
--
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--