From nmh-workers-bounces+ehood=mallorn.com@nongnu.org Sat Mar 8 04:27:02 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on lorien.mallorn.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-mallorn-MailScanner-Watermark: 1205577127.8191@KK8xXX1WsuKC9pH3Kc8quQ X-Envelope-From: nmh-workers-bounces+ehood=mallorn.com@nongnu.org X-Envelope-To: Return-Path: Received: from lorien.mallorn.com [208.78.102.2] by remote.mallorn.com with POP3 (fetchmail-6.3.8) for (single-drop); Sat, 08 Mar 2008 04:27:02 -0700 (MST) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by lorien.mallorn.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m28AVxoD030612 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2008 05:32:04 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JXwLO-0007iG-Up for ehood@mallorn.com; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 05:31:59 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JXwL4-0007fS-Lw for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 05:31:39 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JXwL2-0007b5-1Y for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 05:31:37 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JXwL1-0007ad-PA for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 05:31:35 -0500 Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JXwL1-0006vv-90 for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 05:31:35 -0500 Received: from c83-252-237-4.bredband.comhem.se ([83.252.237.4]:39801 helo=tippex.mynet.homeunix.org) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JXwKz-0006Hg-4m for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 11:31:34 +0100 Received: from tippex (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tippex.mynet.homeunix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C1393C070 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2008 11:31:22 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 04/02/2003 (gentoo 2.7.2) with nmh-1.2 To: nmh-workers@nongnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 11:31:22 +0100 From: Anders Eriksson Message-Id: <20080308103122.65C1393C070@tippex.mynet.homeunix.org> X-Originating-IP: 83.252.237.4 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JXwKz-0006Hg-4m. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1JXwKz-0006Hg-4m cacbdd1c7a6ec283334f7d8a61cbc518 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) Subject: [Nmh-workers] content-transfer-encoding: base64 X-BeenThere: nmh-workers@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: nmh-workers.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nmh-workers-bounces+ehood=mallorn.com@nongnu.org Errors-To: nmh-workers-bounces+ehood=mallorn.com@nongnu.org X-mallorn-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-mallorn-MailScanner: Found to be clean Hi, I regularly get traffic form a bugzilla in the following form: Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-transfer-encoding: base64 aHR0cDovL2J1Z3MuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnL3Nob3dfYnVnLmNnaT9pZD0xNDY4NwoKCk1hcnRp bi3DiXJpYyBSYWNpbmUgPHEtZnVua0Bpa2kuZmk+IGNoYW5nZWQ6CgogICAgICAgICAgIFdoYXQg ICAgfFJlbW92ZWQgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICB8QWRkZWQKLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LQogICAgICAgICAgQ29tcG9uZW50fERyaXZlci9BTUQgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICB8RHJpdmVy L3JhZGVvbmhkCgoKCgotLSAKQ29uZmlndXJlIGJ1Z21haWw6IGh0dHA6Ly9idWdzLmZyZWVkZXNr dG9wLm9yZy91c2VycHJlZnMuY2dpP3RhYj1lbWFpbAotLS0tLS0tIFlvdSBhcmUgcmVjZWl2aW5n IHRoaXMgbWFpbCBiZWNhdXNlOiAtLS0tLS0tCllvdSBhcmUgdGhlIFFBIGNvbnRhY3QgZm9yIHRo ZSBidWcuCllvdSBhcmUgdGhlIGFzc2lnbmVlIGZvciB0aGUgYnVnLgpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXwp4b3JnLXRlYW0gbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0Cnhv cmctdGVhbUBsaXN0cy54Lm9yZwpodHRwOi8vbGlzdHMueC5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby94 b3JnLXRlYW0K -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: radeonhd+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: radeonhd+help@opensuse.org show erros out with: (Message lists/radeonhd:646) mhshow: invalid BASE64 encoding -- continuing (content text/plain in message 646) mhshow: invalid BASE64 encoding -- continuing (content text/plain in message 646) mhshow: invalid BASE64 encoding -- continuing (content text/plain in message 646) mhshow: invalid BASE64 encoding -- continuing (content text/plain in message 646) mhshow: invalid BASE64 encoding -- continuing (content text/plain in message 646) mhshow: invalid BASE64 encoding -- continuing (content text/plain in message 646) mhshow: invalid BASE64 encoding -- continuing (content text/plain in message 646) mhshow: invalid BASE64 encoding -- continuing (content text/plain in message 646) mhshow: invalid BASE64 encoding -- continuing (content text/plain in message 646) mhshow: invalid BASE64 encoding -- continuing (content text/plain in message 646) mhshow: invalid BASE64 encoding -- continuing (content text/plain in message 646) mhshow: invalid BASE64 encoding -- continuing (content text/plain in message 646) mhshow: invalid BASE64 encoding (content text/plain in message 646) Seems familiar? Is cte:base64 legal, or is nmh missing something? Judging from the bugzilla list, others can read the messages fine. /Anders _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers From nmh-workers-bounces+ehood=mallorn.com@nongnu.org Sat Mar 8 09:27:03 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on lorien.mallorn.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-mallorn-MailScanner-Watermark: 1205597081.69196@ir4btVH/5Sddb2CUPfdOqQ X-Envelope-From: nmh-workers-bounces+ehood=mallorn.com@nongnu.org X-Envelope-To: Return-Path: Received: from lorien.mallorn.com [208.78.102.2] by remote.mallorn.com with POP3 (fetchmail-6.3.8) for (single-drop); Sat, 08 Mar 2008 09:27:03 -0700 (MST) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by lorien.mallorn.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m28G4ZPM029886 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2008 11:04:40 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JY1XH-0005N5-Cz for ehood@mallorn.com; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 11:04:35 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JY1Wr-00053H-5L for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 11:04:09 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JY1Wp-000514-9c for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 11:04:08 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JY1Wo-00050Z-RW for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 11:04:06 -0500 Received: from euclid.cs.niu.edu ([131.156.145.14]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JY1Wo-0007UT-BT for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 11:04:06 -0500 Received: from localhost (rickert@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by euclid.cs.niu.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m28G3oNB012963; Sat, 8 Mar 2008 10:03:51 -0600 (CST) To: Anders Eriksson Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] content-transfer-encoding: base64 References: <20080308103122.65C1393C070@tippex.mynet.homeunix.org> In-reply-to: <20080308103122.65C1393C070@tippex.mynet.homeunix.org> Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 10:03:50 -0600 Message-ID: <12960.1204992230@euclid.cs.niu.edu> From: Neil W Rickert X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) Cc: nmh-workers@nongnu.org X-BeenThere: nmh-workers@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: nmh-workers.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nmh-workers-bounces+ehood=mallorn.com@nongnu.org Errors-To: nmh-workers-bounces+ehood=mallorn.com@nongnu.org X-mallorn-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-mallorn-MailScanner: Found to be clean Anders Eriksson wrote on Mar 8, 2008: >I regularly get traffic form a bugzilla in the following form: (a bunch of lines deleted here) >b3JnLXRlYW0K -- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: radeonhd+unsubscribe@opensuse.org >For additional commands, e-mail: radeonhd+help@opensuse.org The problem is that the "unsubscribe" footer has been appended to the base64 data. Whoever added that footer should have done it as a separate attachment. -NWR _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers From nmh-workers-bounces+ehood=mallorn.com@nongnu.org Mon Mar 10 09:27:03 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on lorien.mallorn.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-mallorn-MailScanner-Watermark: 1205769310.54916@as3ymTBGaBX0gt7kvYBXPA X-Envelope-From: nmh-workers-bounces+ehood=mallorn.com@nongnu.org X-Envelope-To: Return-Path: Received: from lorien.mallorn.com [208.78.102.2] by remote.mallorn.com with POP3 (fetchmail-6.3.8) for (single-drop); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:27:03 -0700 (MST) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by lorien.mallorn.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m2AFt3Bx008821 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:55:08 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JYkL8-0005WM-JX for ehood@mallorn.com; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:55:02 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JYkK8-0004u9-Ux for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:54:00 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JYkK5-0004r6-6Y for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:54:00 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JYkK5-0004r1-2q for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:53:57 -0400 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([128.173.14.107]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JYkK4-000403-V8 for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:53:57 -0400 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu (turing-police.cc.vt.edu [127.0.0.1]) by turing-police.cc.vt.edu (8.14.3.Alpha0/8.14.3.Alpha0) with ESMTP id m2AFrsJw014291; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:53:54 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: Anders Eriksson Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] content-transfer-encoding: base64 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 08 Mar 2008 11:31:22 +0100." <20080308103122.65C1393C070@tippex.mynet.homeunix.org> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <20080308103122.65C1393C070@tippex.mynet.homeunix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:53:54 -0400 Message-ID: <14288.1205164434@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Cc: nmh-workers@nongnu.org X-BeenThere: nmh-workers@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: nmh-workers.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1602848266==" Sender: nmh-workers-bounces+ehood=mallorn.com@nongnu.org Errors-To: nmh-workers-bounces+ehood=mallorn.com@nongnu.org X-mallorn-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-mallorn-MailScanner: Found to be clean --===============1602848266== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1205164434_3101P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --==_Exmh_1205164434_3101P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Sat, 08 Mar 2008 11:31:22 +0100, Anders Eriksson said: > Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > Content-transfer-encoding: base64 > > Seems familiar? Is cte:base64 legal, or is nmh missing something? Judging from > the bugzilla list, others can read the messages fine. It's legal. I started chasing a similar bug in exmh, which I tracked down to the fact that some encoders leave a trailing blank on the last line. I didn't get as far as figuring out if the error was in exmh's tcl code, or down in nhm. --==_Exmh_1205164434_3101P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFH1VmScC3lWbTT17ARAmR3AJ9u6VjNAdARtEbeW5c6m1oggV6ibQCff4dt HA/Jt+DHcEOvL+5YNYh83nc= =wG2V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1205164434_3101P-- --===============1602848266== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers --===============1602848266==-- From nmh-workers-bounces+ehood=mallorn.com@nongnu.org Mon Mar 17 07:27:02 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on lorien.mallorn.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.2.4 X-mallorn-MailScanner-Watermark: 1206365369.29068@mMtSpx3naEisAhzZJLxyCA X-Envelope-From: nmh-workers-bounces+ehood=mallorn.com@nongnu.org X-Envelope-To: Return-Path: Received: from lorien.mallorn.com [208.78.102.2] by remote.mallorn.com with POP3 (fetchmail-6.3.8) for (single-drop); Mon, 17 Mar 2008 07:27:02 -0700 (MST) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by lorien.mallorn.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m2HDTN9c028925 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 09:29:29 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JbFP1-0003YL-DM for ehood@mallorn.com; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 09:29:23 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JacWA-0006Be-VD for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:58:11 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JacW9-0006BP-CQ for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:58:10 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JacW9-0006BM-4V for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:58:09 -0400 Received: from vir.isi.edu ([128.9.160.91]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JacW8-00011Z-Gs for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:58:08 -0400 Received: from dash.isi.edu (dsl081-035-114.lax1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.35.114]) (authenticated bits=0) by vir.isi.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m2FJw4Aj013177 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:58:05 -0700 Received: from dash.isi.edu (localhost.isi.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dash.isi.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m2FJtUH2013720 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:55:30 -0700 To: nmh-workers@nongnu.org X-url: http://www.isi.edu/~johnh/ MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Multipart_Sat_Mar_15_12:55:30_2008-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:55:30 -0700 Message-ID: <13718.1205610930@dash.isi.edu> From: John Heidemann X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 09:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Nmh-workers] problem with long field names X-BeenThere: nmh-workers@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: nmh-workers.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nmh-workers-bounces+ehood=mallorn.com@nongnu.org Errors-To: nmh-workers-bounces+ehood=mallorn.com@nongnu.org X-mallorn-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-mallorn-MailScanner: Found to be clean --Multipart_Sat_Mar_15_12:55:30_2008-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This is cut-and-pasted from=20 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D437652 Description of problem: Recently (in the last month or so), linkedin.com has started sending very l= ong From fields. As a result, pick fails with messages like this: pick: field name "From notif+qSVakQSqixxnIDNMC-T3Lx04p25VW39JQgVTHbM4Vv0ir0= xnV-CG_gSQxxjCdsSEs56P_1MmEv5E0PNMxxjQFo@bounce.linkedin.com Mon Mar " exc= eeds 127 bytes pick: format error in message 169 Here's the start of the message: =46rom notif+qSVakQSqixxnIDNMC-T3Lx04p25VW39JQgVTHbM4Vv0ir0xnV-CG_gSQxxjCds= SEs56P_1MmEv5E0PNMxxjQFo@bounce.linkedin.com Mon Mar 3 02:03:01 2008 Return-Path: ... Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): nmh-1.2-20070115cvs.4.fc8=20 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. generate a message with a too-long From line 2. scan +inbox 3. Actual Results: See description for error message. Expected Results: No error message, successful scan. Additional info: I have a patch and will attach it subsequently. Patches attached. -John Heidemann --Multipart_Sat_Mar_15_12:55:30_2008-1 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; type=patch Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="nmh-namesz.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- h/mh.h- 2008-03-15 12:34:48.000000000 -0700 +++ h/mh.h 2008-03-15 12:34:59.000000000 -0700 @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ * m_getfld() message parsing */ -#define NAMESZ 128 /* Limit on component name size */ +#define NAMESZ 256 /* Limit on component name size */ #define LENERR (-2) /* Name too long error from getfld */ #define FMTERR (-3) /* Message Format error */ --Multipart_Sat_Mar_15_12:55:30_2008-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII --Multipart_Sat_Mar_15_12:55:30_2008-1 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; type=patch Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="nmh-namesz-spec.patch" --- SPECS/nmh.spec~ 2007-08-21 13:56:08.000000000 -0700 +++ SPECS/nmh.spec 2008-03-15 12:36:03.000000000 -0700 @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ Source0: nmh-1.2-20070115cvs.tar.gz Patch0: nmh-1.1-inc_install.patch Patch1: fix-inc.patch +patch2: nmh-namesz.patch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: ncurses-devel BuildRequires: db4-devel @@ -30,6 +31,7 @@ %setup -q -n nmh-1.2-20070115cvs %patch0 -p0 %patch1 -p0 +%patch2 -p0 %build CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -fno-builtin-strcasecmp" --Multipart_Sat_Mar_15_12:55:30_2008-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII --Multipart_Sat_Mar_15_12:55:30_2008-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers --Multipart_Sat_Mar_15_12:55:30_2008-1-- From nmh-workers-bounces+ehood=mallorn.com@nongnu.org Mon Mar 17 07:27:03 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on lorien.mallorn.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 X-mallorn-MailScanner-Watermark: 1206366193.63839@NmboJOhujOYsd5FxEL4cIw X-Envelope-From: nmh-workers-bounces+ehood=mallorn.com@nongnu.org X-Envelope-To: Return-Path: Received: from lorien.mallorn.com [208.78.102.2] by remote.mallorn.com with POP3 (fetchmail-6.3.8) for (single-drop); Mon, 17 Mar 2008 07:27:03 -0700 (MST) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by lorien.mallorn.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m2HDh7ET031949 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 09:43:12 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JbFcI-0007PX-Hc for ehood@mallorn.com; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 09:43:06 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JbFbz-0007OK-QH for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 09:42:48 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JbFbu-0007J7-8d for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 09:42:47 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JbFbt-0007Ip-TA for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 09:42:41 -0400 Received: from evolution.bress.net ([72.9.228.27]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JbFbt-0001Fp-3o for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 09:42:41 -0400 Received: from evolution.bress.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by evolution.bress.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C87F3F2A292; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 09:41:27 -0400 (EDT) To: John Heidemann From: Josh Bressers Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] problem with long field names In-reply-to: <13718.1205610930@dash.isi.edu> References: <13718.1205610930@dash.isi.edu> Comments: In-reply-to John Heidemann message dated "Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:55:30 -0700." Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 09:41:27 -0400 Message-ID: <23894.1205761287@evolution.bress.net> X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) Cc: nmh-workers@nongnu.org X-BeenThere: nmh-workers@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: nmh-workers.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nmh-workers-bounces+ehood=mallorn.com@nongnu.org Errors-To: nmh-workers-bounces+ehood=mallorn.com@nongnu.org X-mallorn-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-mallorn-MailScanner: Found to be clean > > This is cut-and-pasted from=20 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437652 > > Description of problem: > Recently (in the last month or so), linkedin.com has started sending very l= > ong From fields. As a result, pick fails with messages like this: > > > > pick: field name "From notif+qSVakQSqixxnIDNMC-T3Lx04p25VW39JQgVTHbM4Vv0ir0= > xnV-CG_gSQxxjCdsSEs56P_1MmEv5E0PNMxxjQFo@bounce.linkedin.com Mon Mar " exc= > eeds 127 bytes > pick: format error in message 169 > > Here's the start of the message: > > From notif+qSVakQSqixxnIDNMC-T3Lx04p25VW39JQgVTHbM4Vv0ir0xnV-CG_gSQxxjCdsSEs56P_1MmEv5E0PNMxxjQFo@bounce.linkedin.com > Mon Mar 3 02:03:01 2008 > Return-Path: > ... Ah ha, I now see the problem! It looks like you're trying to view an mbox as a mh message. the From is missing a :, and the line doesn't look like a normal From header. Try to inc that file into your inbox, and you should be OK. The question now becomes, how did it get there. Thanks. -- JB _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers From nmh-workers-bounces+ehood=mallorn.com@nongnu.org Mon Mar 17 15:27:02 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on lorien.mallorn.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 X-mallorn-MailScanner-Watermark: 1206394091.88613@4q0Re+lC7g7yyzmv31IGEA X-Envelope-From: nmh-workers-bounces+ehood=mallorn.com@nongnu.org X-Envelope-To: Return-Path: Received: from lorien.mallorn.com [208.78.102.2] by remote.mallorn.com with POP3 (fetchmail-6.3.8) for (single-drop); Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:27:02 -0700 (MST) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by lorien.mallorn.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m2HLS5eS028605 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:28:10 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JbMsH-0007Vw-3K for ehood@mallorn.com; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:28:05 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JbMs5-0007VC-IR for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:27:53 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JbMs4-0007U3-OZ for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:27:52 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JbMs4-0007U0-I1 for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:27:52 -0400 Received: from vir.isi.edu ([128.9.160.91]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JbMs4-0000o2-2U for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:27:52 -0400 Received: from dash.isi.edu (dash.isi.edu [128.9.160.184]) (authenticated bits=0) by vir.isi.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m2HLRlhf007123 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:27:47 -0700 Received: from dash.isi.edu (localhost.isi.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dash.isi.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m2HLRhY8015752; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:27:43 -0700 X-url: http://www.isi.edu/~johnh/ To: Josh Bressers Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] problem with long field names In-reply-to: <23894.1205761287@evolution.bress.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:27:43 -0700 Message-ID: <15751.1205789263@dash.isi.edu> From: John Heidemann X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Cc: nmh-workers@nongnu.org X-BeenThere: nmh-workers@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: nmh-workers.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nmh-workers-bounces+ehood=mallorn.com@nongnu.org Errors-To: nmh-workers-bounces+ehood=mallorn.com@nongnu.org X-mallorn-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-mallorn-MailScanner: Found to be clean On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 09:41:27 EDT, Josh Bressers wrote: >> >> This is cut-and-pasted from=20 >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437652 >> >> Description of problem: >> Recently (in the last month or so), linkedin.com has started sending very l= >> ong From fields. As a result, pick fails with messages like this: >> >> >> >> pick: field name "From notif+qSVakQSqixxnIDNMC-T3Lx04p25VW39JQgVTHbM4Vv0ir0= >> xnV-CG_gSQxxjCdsSEs56P_1MmEv5E0PNMxxjQFo@bounce.linkedin.com Mon Mar " exc= >> eeds 127 bytes >> pick: format error in message 169 >> >> Here's the start of the message: >> >> From notif+qSVakQSqixxnIDNMC-T3Lx04p25VW39JQgVTHbM4Vv0ir0xnV-CG_gSQxxjCdsSEs56P_1MmEv5E0PNMxxjQFo@bounce.linkedin.com > Mon Mar 3 02:03:01 2008 >> Return-Path: >> ... > >Ah ha, I now see the problem! > >It looks like you're trying to view an mbox as a mh message. the From is >missing a :, and the line doesn't look like a normal From header. > >Try to inc that file into your inbox, and you should be OK. The >question now becomes, how did it get there. Ok, two corrections. First, my original statement about how to reproduce the problem was incorrect. The exact command that reprodcues the problme is: pick -after -1 +savebox -sequence test Giving these kind of messages on a system without the patch I made available: pick: field name "From notif+qSVakQSqxx...(stuff omitted)...@bounce.linkedin.com Mon Mar " exceeds 127 bytes pick: format error in message 169 88 hits Second, I can confirm that the message IS in an mh folder. However, I agree that colon-less From is an mbox. It looks like this came from procmail, which although it supports dropping into MH folders, may not do it quite correctly. If I actually inc it, rather than let procmail deliver it, then nmh rewrites the From into a Return-path with a colon that does not trigger the error. I will try and follow up this bug with procmail. (If you want to make mh robust to this incorrectness of someone else, it looks like a 2-line change to m_getfld.c will do so. Please let me know if you're interested.) Thanks for the help. -John Heidemann _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers From nmh-workers-bounces+ehood=mallorn.com@nongnu.org Tue Mar 18 12:27:06 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on lorien.mallorn.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HS_INDEX_PARAM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable version=3.2.4 X-mallorn-MailScanner-Watermark: 1206471793.20584@IM7VVG61UGOaBw5q2ps0Jw X-Envelope-From: nmh-workers-bounces+ehood=mallorn.com@nongnu.org X-Envelope-To: Return-Path: Received: from lorien.mallorn.com [208.78.102.2] by remote.mallorn.com with POP3 (fetchmail-6.3.8) for (single-drop); Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:27:06 -0700 (MST) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by lorien.mallorn.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m2IJ37Rw025269 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:03:13 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jbh5X-0007WW-BR for ehood@mallorn.com; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:03:07 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jbh4i-0007DV-OK for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:02:16 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jbh4h-0007Cy-L4 for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:02:16 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jbh4h-0007Cm-GW for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:02:15 -0400 Received: from mnementh.archaic.org.uk ([81.2.115.146]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jbh4g-0003mA-WA for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:02:15 -0400 Received: from pm215 (helo=mnementh.archaic.org.uk) by mnementh.archaic.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Jbh4e-0001Uy-1H for nmh-workers@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:02:12 +0000 To: nmh-workers@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] problem with long field names In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:27:43 MST." <15751.1205789263@dash.isi.edu> From: Peter Maydell Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:02:12 +0000 Message-Id: X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: nmh-workers@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: nmh-workers.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nmh-workers-bounces+ehood=mallorn.com@nongnu.org Errors-To: nmh-workers-bounces+ehood=mallorn.com@nongnu.org X-mallorn-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-mallorn-MailScanner: Found to be clean John Heidemann wrote: >I will try and follow up this bug with procmail. (If you want to make >mh robust to this incorrectness of someone else, it looks like a 2-line >change to m_getfld.c will do so. Please let me know if you're >interested.) I'd be interested in seeing the patch, yes. (A similar issue has come up before; see http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?14975 ) -- PMM _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers