On Thursday 01 October 2009 18:28:27 Serge Aumont wrote:
Reply-To: have nothing to do with DKIM,
Correct..
My proposal was to change the From:. If this was undertaken the subsequent
change was to add a reply-to header field to contain the original author
(consistent with the RFC5322 default value). This would only occur if a reply-
to header field did not already exist. No new schematic changes introduced.
--
Daniel Black
Infrastructure Administrator
CAcert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________
dkim-dev mailing list
dkim-dev(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-dev