Oh ok.
Thanks Jim.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 2:11 AM, Jim Fenton <fenton(_at_)bluepopcorn(_dot_)net>
wrote:
Giri,
The minimum acceptable key sizes for DKIM (and related issues) are
currently being revised by the IETF DKIM Crypto Update (dcrup) working
group.
For more details, see:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dcrup/about/
-Jim
On 9/6/17 12:03 PM, Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan wrote:
DKIM still support 1024 bit keys. However SSL minimum bit size requirement
is 2048 bit.
https://www.symantec.com/connect/blogs/deadline-upgrade-2048-bit-ssl-
certificates-sooner-you-might-think
If 1024 bit isn't considered secure anymore, then it also affects DKIM
right? Can anyone tell me why such requirement is not there in DKIM?
Can't we just enforce 2048 bit keys?
--
Regards,
Giri
_______________________________________________
dkim-dev mailing
listdkim-dev@mipassoc.orghttp://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-dev
--
Regards,
Giri
_______________________________________________
dkim-dev mailing list
dkim-dev(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-dev