dkim-ops
[Top] [All Lists]

[dkim-ops] [OT] Suggestion for "i=" tag in DKIMProxy

2008-11-05 19:23:42
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

First of all, i congratulate you have new President, Mr. Obama. Obama's
the path of life gave me some tears. In personal, he is nice guy.

OK, to return to our muttons, a few days ago, i tested for the relation
of "g=" and "i=" tag at Gmail [1]. In the results, i could get a
RFC4871-Compatible identity "@izb.knu.ac.kr" from Gmail. However, what i
wanted really was "bh(_at_)izb(_dot_)knu(_dot_)ac(_dot_)kr" as the identity. 
After some
discussion with Google's DKIM Team, i knew that i(we) need "i=" tag of
DKIM-Signature in out-bond email to transit through DKIMProxy. However
RFC4871 says that implementation of "i" tag of DKIM-Signature is
optional. So i can't force Jason's mind. If it is possible, however, i
really wish Jason to implement the "i=" tag of DKIM-Signature in the
next release schedule. According to MIPA's discussion about "DKIM and
mailing lists", in the future, DKIM's "i=" tag may be used for
RFC2822-From's verification of identity [2].

Last night, i did some investigation about sites to support "i=" tag of
DKIM-Signature in out-bond email. To sum up, the sites are "port25.com",
"testing.dkim.org" and "mtcc.com" currently. I guess there are more
sites than this results if we do investigation more again with so much
spare times.

Here Korea is going to Winter. Take care.. your healthy..

[1] http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/dkim-ops/2008-November/thread.html#67
[2] http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2006q1/thread.html#1753

byunghee
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkkSOD4ACgkQsCouaZaxlv7J6ACffHH5Qv7cG7DbYIPrr+KadUCm
S7QAnjyG1d7n2Sbh92cuJ6cFIDN2QqIy
=73K3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
dkim-ops mailing list
dkim-ops(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-ops

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>