On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
That's still incorrect. "header.i" is required to be the value of the
i= portion of the DKIM signature. Substitutions aren't permitted.
OK Murray, i know your tone of word (Substititions aren't permitted).
*Also* i want to keep RFC4871 as correctly as possible. However, there
is not a rule protecting subdomains. That's the real object of my email.
The value of "i=" in an Authentication-Results: header has very little to
do with sticking to RFC4871. They're different issues.
But as for the real object of your email: What protection does RFC4871 not
offer?
_______________________________________________
dkim-ops mailing list
dkim-ops(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-ops