Matthias Andree wrote:
Makefile.in.in is a generated file.
In that case I guess we should remove it from svn. I'm sure there are
more. (I've already noticed that some diffs and .orig/.rej files made it
in there and should be removed.)
gettext.info suggests listing the source file rather than a generated
file, hence:
Index: po/POTFILES.in
===================================================================
--- po/POTFILES.in (revision 3883)
+++ po/POTFILES.in (working copy)
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
opie.c
options.c
pop3.c
-rcfile_y.c
+rcfile_y.y
report.c
rfc822.c
rpa.c
That looks good to me.
Argh. autoconf is great for the user, but quite a pain for the
developer.
The newer autoconf versions are better, but I wonder if you would want
the bild super structure replaced, I'd suggest deferring that to 6.2.7.
Of course, one problem with removing generated files from svn is that we
end up with different autoconf versions being used. I have autoconf 2.59.
I've commited the ok = 0 initialization in one change, the warning fixes
in another and haven't yet committed the POTFILES.in patch, different
suggestion above. It adds an xgettext warning but fixes the build.
It'd be nice to get rid of the warning if possible, but if the resulting
code handles translation properly then it's probably no big deal.
--
==============================| "A microscope locked in on one point
Rob Funk <rfunk(_at_)funknet(_dot_)net> |Never sees what kind of room that
it's in"
http://www.funknet.net/rfunk | -- Chris Mars, "Stuck in Rewind"