ietf-822
[Top] [All Lists]

ISO 10646

1991-06-06 23:49:05
# But it is probably equally unacceptable to mandate
# support for all of the world's characters in the RFC's conformance
# clause. Would any American vendors take such an RFC seriously?

Why would it be difficult to support "all of" ISO-10646?
The conversion from the sender's character set to ISO-10646 should be
very straight forward.

Oh, I *agree*! It *is* very straightforward, but some people on this
list don't seem to think we can mandate 10646. I would love to be
proved wrong.


Erik


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • ISO 10646, Erik M. van der Poel <=