ISO 106461991-06-06 23:49:05# But it is probably equally unacceptable to mandate # support for all of the world's characters in the RFC's conformance # clause. Would any American vendors take such an RFC seriously? Why would it be difficult to support "all of" ISO-10646? The conversion from the sender's character set to ISO-10646 should be very straight forward. Oh, I *agree*! It *is* very straightforward, but some people on this list don't seem to think we can mandate 10646. I would love to be proved wrong. Erik
|
|