Re: ISO 20221992-01-22 05:28:48I support the removal of the iso-2022-jp material as requested by Erik van der Poel. This should be a win overall when the group that Erik is coordinating drafts a fuller more detailed specification. Also, it appears that the Koreans and Taiwanese are interested in discussing using the JUNET convention, so we may be better off in that the final result would be an cjk-2022 definition that is more general. Ran atkinson(_at_)itd(_dot_)nrl(_dot_)navy(_dot_)mil
|
|