[Top] [All Lists]

Re: filename parameter in content-type?

1993-05-17 09:08:41
--Can't touch this--
In article <0fwrnJG0aG42A9k14B(_at_)thumper(_dot_)bellcore(_dot_)com> 
nsb(_at_)thumper(_dot_)bellcore(_dot_)com (Nathaniel Borenstein) writes:

 nsb> This was removed because most people seemed to agree that it would be
 nsb> better placed in a new optional MIME header, Content-disposition, which
 nsb> someone was supposed to be writing an RFC about but dropped the ball.

Ugh. I have indeed dropped the ball (new job, much confusion.)
However, I do have a fair amount of it done. If someone could spare
the time to help me edit/finish it, it could be put out in short order.

Any takers?

  | J. Laurens Troost - UNIX Systems  | At Work: rens(_at_)imsi(_dot_)com    |
  | Investment Management Svcs, Inc.  | At Play: rens(_at_)century(_dot_)com |
  | 12 East 49th Street,  35th floor  |   Phone: (212) 339-2823   |
  | New York, New York         10017  |     Fax: (212) 444-1980   |
     -- IMS is unlikely to share any of the above opinions --

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: filename parameter in content-type?, Rens Troost <=