Dear ietf-822(_at_)dimacs(_dot_)rutgers(_dot_)edu members:
I would like to add some comment.
In the message
<9412020138(_dot_)AA08997(_at_)calab1(_dot_)shimada(_dot_)nuee(_dot_)nagoya-u(_dot_)ac(_dot_)jp>,
I wrote:
It *MAY* be adequate to treat untyped massages as
US-ASCII plain text in *the United States*. But it is *NOT*
always true in some other countries. The standard which is
intended to be international should not include such local
assumptions.
Untyped massages have no information to interpret,
anyway. So, they are interpreted in the receiver's context.
Maybe as US-ASCII plain text in U.S., as ISO-2022-JP plain
in Japan, and so on. That is how it has been dealt with.
Standard should not define any default interpretation.
P.S. I date put my signature in ISO-2022-JP style, as an
---- dare, I meant ;-)
example of ISO-2022-JP plain text.
--
市\xA8焉扤扤 周一 (Shuichi ICHIKAWA)
<ichikawa(_at_)nuee(_dot_)nagoya-u(_dot_)ac(_dot_)jp>
^^^^^^^^^^ I think many of you will find garbage here.
But we do not. We will be forced to show
garbage, if we are compliant to the draft.
Regards,
--
市\xA8焉扤扤 周一 (Shuichi ICHIKAWA)
<ichikawa(_at_)nuee(_dot_)nagoya-u(_dot_)ac(_dot_)jp>