The Apps ADs discussed the matter of implementation, features and
when to approve things in the IESG yesterday.
The conclusions reached were roughly:
- The intent of the standards process is that used features are in the
standard, and useless features are NOT in it.
Clearly, this is not a simple decision to make.
- The decision on what features should be in the standard and what not
is something the working group should come to consensus on, not
something that the ADs should decide.
- Nevertheless, publication of the current set of MIME documents at
this time is a Good Thing.
Actions resulting from this:
- The current set of MIME drafts is APPROVED, with no changes.
- Before the next advancement in level (to Full Standard), the working
group will be reconvened (probably by a formal reactivation) to review
the documents and decide upon the criteria for features being part of
the Full Standard MIME documents.
Thus spoke the IESG - hope you all can live with that!
This is all fine with me, as you can imagine. I do have a question, however --
should I begin to develop a set of MIME conformance criteria for agents
sending MIME messages? As I stated before, there is some value in this.
(and now to wait for the RFCs - the average wait through the RFC-editor's
queue is around 2 months now)
I take this to mean that I should forward the documents to the RFC Editor
now. Or should I wait for a formal IESG announcement before doing so?
Ned