Re: another potential content-type suffix convention

ietf-822

2000-03-15 07:53:05

 But!  sending audio or binary app data
and not encoding it in something save like B64 is foolish.


the voice mail people are the folks who pushed for binary SMTP.

Keith

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
another potential content-type suffix convention, Keith Moore Re: another potential content-type suffix convention, ned . freed RE: another potential content-type suffix convention, Rick Troth Re: another potential content-type suffix convention, Keith Moore <=

Previous by Date:	RE: another potential content-type suffix convention, Rick Troth
Next by Date:	Re: reason for application/iotp-xml (was RE: Registration of MIME med ia type APPLICATION/IOTP), ned . freed
Previous by Thread:	RE: another potential content-type suffix convention, Rick Troth
Next by Thread:	Finishing the XML-tagging discussion, Paul Hoffman / IMC
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]