At 09:07 AM 3/19/00 -0500, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>The other problem I have with Content-Feature is that it isn't clear to me
>- based on my RFC dredgings, which may not be complete - whether or not
>there is any kind of registration process or even official status for
>Content-Feature.
FYI: RFC 2506; also RFC 2533.
(Content-feature is currently an I-D proposal that employs this framework
to label MIME content.)
And to try and dispel some misunderstandings: I have suggested use of the
CONNEG framework for _content negotiation_. To me, the use of "-xml" as an
aid to detecting generic XML seems a reasonable and useful idea; I just
think that using a naming convention as a basis for content negotiation
would be pushing it too far.
I agree that the suffix isn't appropriate for negotiation; this should
be handled by some sort of feature tag.
Ned