Re: Language translation in e-mail standards

> if the vendors don't implement multipart/alternative correctly,
> how is defining a new extension going to help?  we already have
> a well-defined construct; what's needed is for MUA vendors to use it.
Hear, hear!  Perhaps this use of multipart/alternative would be a bit
of an incentive to them to get it right.  Though Outlook can't even
seem to get something as basic as threading right.

Bill